Hi,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Jerome Shidel wrote:
>
>> On Aug 12, 2017, at 7:32 PM, Pierre LaMontagne wrote:
>>
>> Isn't USB 1.1 & 2.0 supposed to be compatible? My 2.0 flash drive wasn't
>> recognized on
>> my FD 1.1 USB PC. Is there a util that can list available drives like in in
>>
New cameras are using a new format that I can't read.
I can read FAT 16 & FAT 32. Web search said that
they are using FAT 64. FDISK doesn't even detect it.
SD chips go undetected with this new format.
cheers
DS
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 13:01:54 -0500 Rugxulo writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> New cameras are using a new format that I can't read.
> I can read FAT 16 & FAT 32. Web search said that
> they are using FAT 64. FDISK doesn't even detect it.
> SD chips go undetected with this new format.
I think you mean exFAT. It's sup
On 8/13/2017 4:56 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> New cameras are using a new format that I can't read.
> I can read FAT 16 & FAT 32. Web search said that
> they are using FAT 64. FDISK doesn't even detect it.
> SD chips go undetected with this new format.
As Dennis already mentioned, newer cameras/SD
from Ralf Quint:
>
> On 8/13/2017 4:56 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
> > New cameras are using a new format that I can't read.
> > I can read FAT 16 & FAT 32. Web search said that
> > they are using FAT 64. FDISK doesn't even detect it.
> > SD chips go undetected with this new format.
> As Dennis alre
