community is
bad. Losing the place where a lot of the programmers hang out is even
worse.
Mike
--
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:10:45 -0700
From: Michael C. Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Heads up: DOS ain't dead forum
I just saw the post that, he is not going to close the DOS ain't dead forum,
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=10561
Thats nice to know,
I still would be interested in knowing how well a DOS server can connect to my
site,..and any new members are welcome.
Thanks from Garry
2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com:
[..] One interesting option on say a quad
core system is to have the 32 bit OS partition the memory, the monitor,
the hard disk, and the cpu cores so you can have multiple concurrent 16
bit Freedos instances.
Something similar have
On 9/14/2011 6:14 AM, Zbigniew wrote:
Most probably you can run on your multicore machine concurrent
sessions of DOSBOX (or DOSEMU).
modern hardware can emulate older hardware. Now you have
a clean means of supporting modern hardware for people using old DOS
applications. Want your multi
Em 14-09-2011 08:14, Zbigniew escreveu:
But, actually, why you want another DOSBOX to be created? You've got
already DOSBOX and DOSEMU... it's not enough?
Well, it is not really satisfactory. DosBox does not have packet driver
for networking and Dosemu is not getting any updates ant it
Dear all,
You have probably noticed, that I have received a lot of public feedback
(plus a few private mails) on my announcement to close this forum.
Thanks for that! I didn't know, that this forum is such an important
part of the DOS community.
Today I have also received a //large// donation
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 19:00 -0500, Michael B. Brutman wrote:
Here is the link to the announcement:
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=10488
To me this is a serious problem - losing a piece of the DOS community is
bad. Losing the place where a lot of the programmers
2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com:
[..] I'd say that Freedos has it's
uses, but without active development on a variant that can take
advantage of multiple cores and modern hardware, there are probably a
dwindling number of uses for it. Without hardware protection and
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 01:00 +, Zbigniew wrote:
2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson plu...@robinson-west.com:
[..] I'd say that Freedos has it's
uses, but without active development on a variant that can take
advantage of multiple cores and modern hardware, there are probably a
dwindling
Would be great to keep the forum archive, at least for read-only so
people ca nsearch answers to old questions, this is an important
knowledge base.
El 13/09/2011 07:30 p.m., Michael B. Brutman escribió:
Here is the link to the announcement:
I emailed Robert off-list to see if I might move it to freedos.org. I'd like
to see his forum continue in some way.
On Sep 13, 2011 9:53 PM, Marco Achury marcoach...@gmail.com wrote:
Would be great to keep the forum archive, at least for read-only so people
ca nsearch answers to old questions,
11 matches
Mail list logo
