subject:"\[Freedreno\] \[pull\] drm\/msm\: msm\-next for 4.9"

Re: [Freedreno] [pull] drm/msm: msm-next for 4.9

2016-09-20 Thread Rob Clark

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jordan Crouse wrote: > So this isn't how I planned on announcing it, but hey, I'm back. > >> Rob Clark (5): >> drm/msm: extend the submit ioctl to pass in flags > > Renaming 'pipe' to 'flags' would break backwards compatibility - I'm

Re: [Freedreno] [pull] drm/msm: msm-next for 4.9

2016-09-20 Thread Jordan Crouse

So this isn't how I planned on announcing it, but hey, I'm back. > Rob Clark (5): > drm/msm: extend the submit ioctl to pass in flags Renaming 'pipe' to 'flags' would break backwards compatibility - I'm not big fan of 'pipe' either but I would strongly recommend keeping it just to keep

[Freedreno] [pull] drm/msm: msm-next for 4.9

2016-09-17 Thread Rob Clark

Hi Dave, A bit smaller pull-req this time around. Some continued DT binding cleanup to get the corresponding dts bits merged upstream (through other trees). And explicit fence-fd support for submit ioctl. The following changes since commit 8506912b969b60aacc733315eeeb46b014d920a4: Merge