I have to install the new version, I have the 3.2 installed.
I have to integrate the web apps to my web administration site, so i can add,
remove, update and find users.
Thanks
Alexandre Santos
On 07 Feb 2014, at 15:15, Alexandre Santos asan...@uc.pt wrote:
Thanks, i´m new to this json.
On 01/28/2014 09:35 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 01/23/2014 02:17 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
...
The URL endpoint /ipa/rest suggests that if we implement a complete REST
API for IPA it would live here. Is the API supposed to be
future-compatible? (The API itself seems to be
As this is not documented, I am thinking the easiest approach will be to open
Web UI and see what JSON requests it sends to IPA for desired actions. I tested
that for example with Chrome developer tools and I could easily see that for
showing a particular user it uses following JSON:
On 02/06/2014 07:25 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 07:06 +0100, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
the attached patches fix the following tickets
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4134
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4132
and some additional errors as well. Comments in
Hello,
I would to follow up on a core devel team discussion we had last week. Part of
it were changes to milestones as we currently use it.
1) Pilsner/Beer Exchange/Deferred
Currently, we have 3 levels of deferring feature request and bug fix tickets to
later releases:
a) Pilsner barrel: when
On 10.2.2014 08:50, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 7.2.2014 10:42, Martin Basti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:04 +0100, Martin Basti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 16:37 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 6.2.2014 15:57, Martin Basti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 10:59 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
On
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 12:22 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 10.2.2014 08:50, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 7.2.2014 10:42, Martin Basti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:04 +0100, Martin Basti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 16:37 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 6.2.2014 15:57, Martin Basti wrote:
On
Hello,
FreeIPA core devel team had a discussion about how to organize our development
milestones better. Currently, all next release development tickets are put into
monthly milestones and then worked in based on priorities.
However, this does does not fly well with the non-critical tickets as
On 02/10/2014 01:22 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hello,
FreeIPA core devel team had a discussion about how to organize our development
milestones better. Currently, all next release development tickets are put into
monthly milestones and then worked in based on priorities.
However, this does does
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hello,
I would like to follow up on a core devel team discussion we had last week. We
found out, that it would be beneficial to see a reviewer of the patches that
land in our git.
This will serve both as a nice way to both generate statistics who is
On 02/10/2014 01:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hello,
I would like to follow up on a core devel team discussion we had last week.
We
found out, that it would be beneficial to see a reviewer of the patches that
land in our git.
This will serve
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:59:27PM +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 02/10/2014 01:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hello,
I would like to follow up on a core devel team discussion we had last
week. We
found out, that it would be beneficial to see a
On 10.2.2014 13:14, Martin Basti wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 12:22 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 10.2.2014 08:50, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 7.2.2014 10:42, Martin Basti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:04 +0100, Martin Basti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 16:37 +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hi,
these patches implements the OTP Web UI.
Last 5 patches is the OTP UI.
First 6 patches is a little refactoring/bug fixes needed for them.
General password dialog is introduced to
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hi,
these patches implements the OTP Web UI.
Last 5 patches is the OTP UI.
First 6 patches is a little refactoring/bug fixes needed for them.
General password dialog is introduced to
On 10.2.2014 17:09, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hi,
these patches implements the OTP Web UI.
Last 5 patches is the OTP UI.
First 6 patches is a little refactoring/bug fixes needed for them.
On 10.2.2014 17:03, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hi,
these patches implements the OTP Web UI.
Last 5 patches is the OTP UI.
First 6 patches is a little refactoring/bug fixes needed for them.
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:11 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't
This is a typo patch and is therefore an easy review for an aspiring
reviewer. :)
Nathaniel
From 17a85a5e5b620c581c6f70a639240738b2b6794c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathaniel McCallum npmccal...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:39:53 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix OTP token names/labels
---
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 17:17 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10.2.2014 17:03, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hi,
these patches implements the OTP Web UI.
Last 5 patches is the OTP UI.
First
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 17:16 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10.2.2014 17:09, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hi,
these patches implements the OTP Web UI.
Last 5 patches is the OTP UI.
First
Patch attached.
From e7eac9997750ee1a8ce864746dbc6faa54de766b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathaniel McCallum npmccal...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:07:51 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix generation of invalid OTP URIs
---
ipalib/plugins/otptoken.py | 9 +
1 file changed, 9
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 11:49 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 17:16 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10.2.2014 17:09, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hi,
these patches
On 10.2.2014 17:49, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 17:16 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10.2.2014 17:09, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 13.1.2014 17:09, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Hi,
these patches implements the OTP Web UI.
On 02/10/2014 05:03 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hello,
I would to follow up on a core devel team discussion we had last week. Part of
it were changes to milestones as we currently use it.
1) Pilsner/Beer Exchange/Deferred
Currently, we have 3 levels of deferring feature request and bug fix tickets
On 02/10/2014 07:28 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/10/2014 01:22 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
Hello,
FreeIPA core devel team had a discussion about how to organize our
development
milestones better. Currently, all next release development tickets
are put into
monthly milestones and then worked
- Original Message -
From: Dmitri Pal d...@redhat.com
To: freeipa-devel@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 9:21:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] Clarifying Pilsner/Beer Exchange/Deferred Trac
milestones
...
a) Pilsner - Future releases (with appropriate milestone
Hi,
We have a ticket [1] about Samba FS documentation. Alexander added a
comment recently but I know Sumit is working on this effort now.
Should we pull ticket in and/or merge it with some other ticket wit have?
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3999
--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal
Sr.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4173
I do have one question. Do we ever try to upgrade the SSSD config? If
so, should we try to upgrade the SSSD config to enable FAST by
default?
Nathaniel
From f3ee3e6b4aaddd4636fdee1e2ffad28a7e23559f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathaniel McCallum
On 02/07/2014 04:33 AM, Alexandre Santos wrote:
Hi Martin,
I´ve tried your example and i get this error:
curl -v \
-H Content-Type:application/json \
-H Accept:applicaton/json\
--negotiate -u : \
--delegation always \
--cacert /etc/ipa/ca.crt \
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 04:06:37PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4173
I do have one question. Do we ever try to upgrade the SSSD config? If
so, should we try to upgrade the SSSD config to enable FAST by
default?
Nathaniel
What if we changed the
Hi all,
I would like to help contribute some to the FreeIPA project. I am an
Infrastructure engineer and not a developer by trade, and I am familiar
with the IPA product. I can do some basic things (which may not be that
much help) such as documentation, some simple code (trivial and some
On 02/11/2014 05:49 AM, Darth Vader wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to help contribute some to the FreeIPA project. I am an
Infrastructure engineer and not a developer by trade, and I am familiar
with the IPA product. I can do some basic things (which may not be that
much help) such as
34 matches
Mail list logo
