On 05/14/2012 07:08 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 5/10/2012 7:19 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Updated patch attached. See comments below.
On 05/08/2012 04:23 AM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
Try adding a very long DNS zone, then open the zone. Compare the
breadcrumbs in the DNS Resource Records
On 5/10/2012 7:19 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Updated patch attached. See comments below.
On 05/08/2012 04:23 AM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
Try adding a very long DNS zone, then open the zone. Compare the
breadcrumbs in the DNS Resource Records page and in the Settings page,
in my case the second
Updated patch attached. See comments below.
On 05/08/2012 04:23 AM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 5/3/2012 8:26 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 05/03/2012 03:19 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
I found that limitation of maximum pkey length in facet header is not
working well. Attaching patch #134 which
The code works, it's ACKed. I have some comments below:
On 5/2/2012 8:33 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
This bunch of patches are implementing ticket #2247. They introduce some
new logic and types of internal objects. There might be design issues
(mainly in state evaluation). I would appreciate some
On 5/3/2012 8:26 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 05/03/2012 03:19 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
I found that limitation of maximum pkey length in facet header is not
working well. Attaching patch #134 which actually calculates it.
I found useless line in the patch. Corrected version attached.
Try
I found that limitation of maximum pkey length in facet header is not
working well. Attaching patch #134 which actually calculates it.
On 05/02/2012 03:33 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
This bunch of patches are implementing ticket #2247. They introduce some
new logic and types of internal objects.
On 05/03/2012 03:19 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
I found that limitation of maximum pkey length in facet header is not
working well. Attaching patch #134 which actually calculates it.
I found useless line in the patch. Corrected version attached.
On 05/02/2012 03:33 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
