Dne 30.7.2014 v 16:39 Nalin Dahyabhai napsal(a):
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:28:50PM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
These two functions are used to force local hostname in certmonger. IMO the
right thing to do here would be to drop these two functions and fix
ipa-submit so that it reads the required
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 09:19:28AM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
If you mean host, yes, the man page says it's the server's hostname, but I
don't think that's entirely true - it is currently set during server
install, but it defaults to local hostname even on clients. IMO we could set
it in
On 07/23/2014 03:45 PM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
Certmonger API looked complete enough to pull this off:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/certmonger.git/tree/doc/api.txt
If I am wrong, please tell me.
No, it's meant to be complete
Dne 30.7.2014 v 15:51 David Kupka napsal(a):
On 07/23/2014 03:45 PM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
Certmonger API looked complete enough to pull this off:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/certmonger.git/tree/doc/api.txt
If I am wrong,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:28:50PM +0200, Jan Cholasta wrote:
These two functions are used to force local hostname in certmonger. IMO the
right thing to do here would be to drop these two functions and fix
ipa-submit so that it reads the required configuration from
/etc/ipa/default.conf.
Can
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:51:08PM +0200, David Kupka wrote:
In fact it is almost enough complete for us. The only operation I can't find
is 'write ca_external_helper'.
add_principal_to_cas and remove_principal_from_cas are modifying this entry
in ca file. Certmonger provide 'get_location'
While solving ticket #4280 I noticed that we are messing with
certmonger's files right under its hands. That can lead to some
unpleasant race condition issues.
Is there any reason why not to call certmonger via DBus and ask it to
stop tracking the requests?
--
David Kupka
On 07/23/2014 09:56 AM, David Kupka wrote:
While solving ticket #4280 I noticed that we are messing with certmonger's
files right under its hands. That can lead to some unpleasant race condition
issues.
Is there any reason why not to call certmonger via DBus and ask it to stop
tracking the
On 23.7.2014 10:12, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 09:56 AM, David Kupka wrote:
While solving ticket #4280 I noticed that we are messing with certmonger's
files right under its hands. That can lead to some unpleasant race condition
issues.
Is there any reason why not to call certmonger via
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 09:56 AM, David Kupka wrote:
While solving ticket #4280 I noticed that we are messing with certmonger's
files right under its hands. That can lead to some unpleasant race condition
issues.
Is there any reason why not to call certmonger via
On 07/23/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 23.7.2014 10:12, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 09:56 AM, David Kupka wrote:
While solving ticket #4280 I noticed that we are messing with certmonger's
files right under its hands. That can lead to some unpleasant race condition
issues.
Is
On 23.7.2014 10:38, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 23.7.2014 10:12, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 09:56 AM, David Kupka wrote:
While solving ticket #4280 I noticed that we are messing with certmonger's
files right under its hands. That can lead to some
On 07/23/2014 10:49 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 23.7.2014 10:38, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 23.7.2014 10:12, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 09:56 AM, David Kupka wrote:
While solving ticket #4280 I noticed that we are messing with certmonger's
files
On 23.7.2014 12:23, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 10:49 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 23.7.2014 10:38, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 10:33 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 23.7.2014 10:12, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 07/23/2014 09:56 AM, David Kupka wrote:
While solving ticket #4280 I noticed
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:32:52AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Were there DBus Python bindings available in RHEL 5/6 at the time when the
code was written?
Yes, but the API itself wasn't all there, and large parts of the
internals needed to be rewritten around its 0.53 release. Before
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
Certmonger API looked complete enough to pull this off:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/certmonger.git/tree/doc/api.txt
If I am wrong, please tell me.
No, it's meant to be complete -- the getcert command only uses the APIs
to
16 matches
Mail list logo
