On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (16/06/16 12:00), Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
Require 389-ds-base >= 1.3.5.6
Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly and breaks bind-dyndb-ldap.
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2016-June/msg00477.html
On 16.6.2016 15:58, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (16/06/16 12:00), Petr Spacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Require 389-ds-base >= 1.3.5.6
>>
>> Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly and breaks bind-dyndb-ldap.
>> See https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2016-June/msg00477.html
>>
>>
On (16/06/16 12:00), Petr Spacek wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Require 389-ds-base >= 1.3.5.6
>
>Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly and breaks bind-dyndb-ldap.
>See https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2016-June/msg00477.html
>
>https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2008
>
>--
>Petr^2 Spacek
On 16.06.2016 12:21, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/16/2016 12:14 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 16.6.2016 12:12, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/16/2016 12:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
Require 389-ds-base >= 1.3.5.6
Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly
no. Old DS handles filters strictly
On 06/16/2016 12:14 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 16.6.2016 12:12, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/16/2016 12:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
Require 389-ds-base >= 1.3.5.6
Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly
no. Old DS handles filters strictly as documented in the admin guide,
requiring
On 16.6.2016 12:12, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2016 12:00 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Require 389-ds-base >= 1.3.5.6
>>
>> Old DS handles LDAP filters incorrectly
> no. Old DS handles filters strictly as documented in the admin guide,
> requiring access rights to each