On 12.02.2016 10:18, David Kupka wrote:
On 11/02/16 18:47, Martin Basti wrote:
On 11.02.2016 11:08, Martin Basti wrote:
On 09.02.2016 15:26, David Kupka wrote:
On 09/02/16 11:28, Martin Basti wrote:
On 03.02.2016 10:19, David Kupka wrote:
On 01/02/16 14:18, Martin Basti wrote:
On
On 10/02/16 08:51, David Kupka wrote:
This topology should be closer to the ones in real world than our
current ones. But it is still impractical and (hopefully) no one has
such deployment.
If some user could share his/her deployment topology I will be happy to
create generator based on it.
Sending one more topology test. This one creates a M groups consisting N
(N>=2) servers.
First two servers in each group are used to connect with nearest four
groups and also with the other servers inside the group (when N>2).
Servers inside the group (not connecting to other groups) are
On 11/02/16 18:47, Martin Basti wrote:
On 11.02.2016 11:08, Martin Basti wrote:
On 09.02.2016 15:26, David Kupka wrote:
On 09/02/16 11:28, Martin Basti wrote:
On 03.02.2016 10:19, David Kupka wrote:
On 01/02/16 14:18, Martin Basti wrote:
On 26.01.2016 14:16, Martin Basti wrote:
On 2016-02-11 14:43, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> Pushed to:
>> master: 5ac3a3cee534a16db86c541b9beff4939f03410e
>> ipa-4-3: c3496a4a4893c75789bdf0c617e46923361fb43b
>>
>
> Very cool! Thanks guys! Looking forward to deploying FreeIPA 4.3.1 on the
> FreeIPA public demo :-)
I have to change the cipher
On 02/12/2016 10:59 AM, David Kupka wrote:
Sending one more topology test. This one creates a M groups consisting
N (N>=2) servers.
First two servers in each group are used to connect with nearest four
groups and also with the other servers inside the group (when N>2).
Servers inside the group
On 02/12/2016 10:50 AM, David Kupka wrote:
On 10/02/16 08:51, David Kupka wrote:
This topology should be closer to the ones in real world than our
current ones. But it is still impractical and (hopefully) no one has
such deployment.
If some user could share his/her deployment topology I will be
On 02/11/2016 12:31 PM, Pavel Vomacka wrote:
Hello,
The canvas of the graph had static size. This patch fixes this issue
and from now the graph canvas is resized according to the window size.
Pavel Vomacka
Because of changes in previous patch I'm sending also this one again.
Plus I
On 02/04/2016 08:49 AM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Petr,
On 02/03/2016 02:19 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 3.2.2016 10:22, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Guys, can anyone take a look at this?
The commit message does not explain why you are setting search path.
Fixed.
I have to say that I do not like touching
On 12.02.2016 13:03, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 02/12/2016 10:50 AM, David Kupka wrote:
On 10/02/16 08:51, David Kupka wrote:
This topology should be closer to the ones in real world than our
current ones. But it is still impractical and (hopefully) no one has
such deployment.
If some user could
On 12.02.2016 13:03, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 02/12/2016 10:59 AM, David Kupka wrote:
Sending one more topology test. This one creates a M groups
consisting N (N>=2) servers.
First two servers in each group are used to connect with nearest four
groups and also with the other servers inside the
Hi,
Please review attached patch for pytest-multihost plugin.
Fixes: https://fedorahosted.org/python-pytest-multihost/ticket/4
Thanks,
Scott
--
Scott Poore
Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
From 5fadf05ee1be771e966b67007c0cc3e529e6308c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott
12 matches
Mail list logo
