On 05/03/2016 06:11 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 18:27 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>> Hi Matt, Nathaniel and Simo,
>>
>> I'd like to kindly check the status of this effort therefore
>> resurrecting this thread.
>>
>> First, Is the design up to date? Are there still aspects
On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 18:27 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> Hi Matt, Nathaniel and Simo,
>
> I'd like to kindly check the status of this effort therefore
> resurrecting this thread.
>
> First, Is the design up to date? Are there still aspects which need
> to
> be figured out?
I do not believe
Hi Matt, Nathaniel and Simo,
I'd like to kindly check the status of this effort therefore
resurrecting this thread.
First, Is the design up to date? Are there still aspects which need to
be figured out?
Second execution, I see that Matt is about to finish
On 02/29/2016 11:35 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 09:00 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 02/25/2016 10:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:13 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-25
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 09:00 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 02/25/2016 10:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:13 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:49 -0500,
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 15:44 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 11:20 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:24 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > I was thinking:
> > > 1. Bind as the entity validating the 2nd factor.
> > > 2. Extop which takes the:
> > >
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 11:20 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:24 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > I was thinking:
> > 1. Bind as the entity validating the 2nd factor.
> > 2. Extop which takes the:
> > * user dn
> > * type of 2nd factor
> > * validation data
> > *
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:24 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:12 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 09:30 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:51 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > Questions:
> > > > - Should the control
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:12 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 09:30 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:51 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > Questions:
> > > - Should the control specify what kind of auth specifically
> > > should be
> > > required ?
> >
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 09:30 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:51 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:13 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:51 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:13 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:49 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2016-02-25
On 02/25/2016 10:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:13 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:49 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:13 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:49 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:49 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 09:55 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:49 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 09:55 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 20:50 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 2016-02-21
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 09:55 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 20:50 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 20:20 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 09:55 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 20:50 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 20:20 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://github.com/npmccallum/freeipa/pull/1
> > >
> > > The above (pseudo) pull request
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 20:50 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 20:20 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/npmccallum/freeipa/pull/1
> >
> > The above (pseudo) pull request contains four patches against
> > FreeIPA
> > to enable the insertion of Authentication
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 20:20 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> https://github.com/npmccallum/freeipa/pull/1
>
> The above (pseudo) pull request contains four patches against FreeIPA
> to enable the insertion of Authentication Indicators into Kerberos
> tickets. The basic flow looks like this.
>
https://github.com/npmccallum/freeipa/pull/1
The above (pseudo) pull request contains four patches against FreeIPA
to enable the insertion of Authentication Indicators into Kerberos
tickets. The basic flow looks like this.
First, we patch ipa-pwd-extop to return a control indicating what
20 matches
Mail list logo