[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#764][comment] Basic uninstaller for the CA

2017-05-16 Thread pvoborni
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/764 Title: #764: Basic uninstaller for the CA pvoborni commented: """ We need to develop something like this, but right now it is not the best time for it. First we need to stabilize 4.5.1 (seems that's almost done). Then focus on testing - current

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#764][comment] Basic uninstaller for the CA

2017-05-09 Thread rcritten
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/764 Title: #764: Basic uninstaller for the CA rcritten commented: """ As far as I can tell it is always recoverable using this. I wasn't able to force a failure of replication, that could be a potential show-stopper. The PR doesn't touch the

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#764][comment] Basic uninstaller for the CA

2017-05-09 Thread stlaz
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/764 Title: #764: Basic uninstaller for the CA stlaz commented: """ @pvoborni @rcritten @martbab This discussion at this PR makes no sense. Clearly we can see that the impact is much higher and should be discussed on designated channels, meaning

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#764][comment] Basic uninstaller for the CA

2017-05-09 Thread martbab
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/764 Title: #764: Basic uninstaller for the CA martbab commented: """ @pvoborni We can try to move the uninstaller logic to the beginning of the install, or make the affected steps idempotent. But still I would be hesitant to merge this PR without

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#764][comment] Basic uninstaller for the CA

2017-05-09 Thread pvoborni
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/764 Title: #764: Basic uninstaller for the CA pvoborni commented: """ Let's first clarify the problem to solve. If I understand @rcritten right, the problem is that if ipa-ca-install fail then one must reinstall the whole replica because the

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#764][comment] Basic uninstaller for the CA

2017-05-09 Thread martbab
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/764 Title: #764: Basic uninstaller for the CA martbab commented: """ @rcritten If it is expected to not clean up properly after a fai;ed installation then I would rather not advertise it as an uninstaller, otherwise users will start to get ideas

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#764][comment] Basic uninstaller for the CA

2017-05-05 Thread rcritten
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/764 Title: #764: Basic uninstaller for the CA rcritten commented: """ What do you mean half-effective? Did you try it? There already IS a unified framework for component uninstallation: each service provides it. There are edge cases when trying to

[Freeipa-devel] [freeipa PR#764][comment] Basic uninstaller for the CA

2017-05-05 Thread martbab
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/764 Title: #764: Basic uninstaller for the CA martbab commented: """ I would avoid having half-effective CA uninstaller given that other components like Samba, DNS(Sec), and now also KRA (given the amount of bugs the uninstaller caused) do not