Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 4.12.2015 14:42, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (03/12/15 09:59), Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/12/15 13:14), Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before
On 4.12.2015 14:42, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > On (03/12/15 09:59), Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> >> Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (02/12/15 13:14), Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before
> acceptance?
>>
On 12/02/2015 07:14 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
I've seen a number of cases over the past couple of months where a
change goes through then shortly afterward a patch to fix the tests.
IMHO this should be caught in advance.
Thi
Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (03/12/15 09:59), Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> On (02/12/15 13:14), Rob Crittenden wrote:
Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
>>> Unit test could be executed as part of "%check" phase in spec files.
>>> I re
On (03/12/15 09:59), Rob Crittenden wrote:
>Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (02/12/15 13:14), Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
>> Unit test could be executed as part of "%check" phase in spec files.
>> I recently added C-base unit tests
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:59:46AM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (02/12/15 13:14), Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
> > Unit test could be executed as part of "%check" phase in spec files.
> > I recentl
Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 3.12.2015 16:07, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> On 3.12.2015 15:34, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 09:08 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 2.12.2015 19:14, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Is it still mandatory that tests pass
On 3.12.2015 16:07, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 3.12.2015 15:34, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Martin Kosek wrote:
On 12/03/2015 09:08 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 2.12.2015 19:14, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acce
Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 3.12.2015 15:34, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2015 09:08 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 2.12.2015 19:14, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
> I've seen a number of cases over th
On (03/12/15 15:53), Petr Spacek wrote:
>On 3.12.2015 15:34, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2015 09:08 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 2.12.2015 19:14, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
> I've seen a num
Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/12/15 13:14), Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
> Unit test could be executed as part of "%check" phase in spec files.
> I recently added C-base unit tests there.
>
> I was not bale to run "make tests" t
On 3.12.2015 15:34, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 12/03/2015 09:08 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> On 2.12.2015 19:14, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
I've seen a number of cases over the past couple of months wh
Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 09:08 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 2.12.2015 19:14, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>>> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
>>> I've seen a number of cases over the past couple of months where a
>>> change goes through then shortly after
On (02/12/15 13:14), Rob Crittenden wrote:
>Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
Unit test could be executed as part of "%check" phase in spec files.
I recently added C-base unit tests there.
I was not bale to run "make tests" there because many tests failed.
If
On 12/03/2015 09:08 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 2.12.2015 19:14, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
>> I've seen a number of cases over the past couple of months where a
>> change goes through then shortly afterward a patch to fix the te
On 2.12.2015 19:14, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
> I've seen a number of cases over the past couple of months where a
> change goes through then shortly afterward a patch to fix the tests.
> IMHO this should be caught in advance.
>
Is it still mandatory that tests pass the unit tests before acceptance?
I've seen a number of cases over the past couple of months where a
change goes through then shortly afterward a patch to fix the tests.
IMHO this should be caught in advance.
Things slip through and goodness knows I've acked m
17 matches
Mail list logo
