On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 11:37 +0200, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> 3.) It seems that the removal of topology suffixes containing
> functioning segments is not handled well. I once tried to do this and
> it
> led to segmentation fault on the dirsrv instance. What is the
> expected
> behavior in this sce
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 12:51 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> On 06/03/2015 11:37 AM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have been playing with the topology related patches and I have
> > encountered a few issues that I would like to address in this thread:
> >
>
> Additional stuff:
>
Hi Petr,
good catch. I didn't check for self referential segments. There is a
check for existing segments, but unfortuantely the entry lookup in the
pblock was incorrect and the test always passed.
For the removal, there is teh assumption that no duplicate segments
exist and so removal of A-
On 06/03/2015 01:32 PM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
Hi Ludwig
On 06/03/2015 12:23 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/03/2015 11:51 AM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
I confirm every point of this.
did you test with all the latest patches applied ? In your issues you
refer to crashes, the crashes reported should b
Hi Ludwig
On 06/03/2015 12:23 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/03/2015 11:51 AM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
I confirm every point of this.
did you test with all the latest patches applied ? In your issues you
refer to crashes, the crashes reported should be resolved, if you
still have crashes, pleas
On 06/03/2015 11:37 AM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been playing with the topology related patches and I have
encountered a few issues that I would like to address in this thread:
Additional stuff:
1. was able to add duplicate segment
- same left and right node
- same directio
On 06/03/2015 12:23 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/03/2015 11:51 AM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
I confirm every point of this.
did you test with all the latest patches applied ? In your issues you
refer to crashes, the crashes reported should be resolved, if you still
have crashes, pleas provide a c
On 06/03/2015 11:37 AM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been playing with the topology related patches and I have
encountered a few issues that I would like to address in this thread:
1.) When replica install for whatever reason crashes _after_ the setup
of replication agreements
On 06/03/2015 11:51 AM, Oleg Fayans wrote:
I confirm every point of this.
did you test with all the latest patches applied ? In your issues you
refer to crashes, the crashes reported should be resolved, if you still
have crashes, pleas provide a core dump or scenario to reproduce the crash.
W
I confirm every point of this.
On 06/03/2015 11:37 AM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been playing with the topology related patches and I have
encountered a few issues that I would like to address in this thread:
1.) When replica install for whatever reason crashes _after_ the s
10 matches
Mail list logo
