Re: [Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server?
Consistency sounds good. How would the name change affect yum update? Chris From: Petr Spacek pspa...@redhat.com To: freeipa-users@redhat.com Date: 17.07.2015 10:49 Subject:[Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server? Sent by:freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com Hello users and developers, I wonder what do you think about naming inconsistency in FreeIPA packages. Packages in Fedora are prefixed with freeipa-* but in RHEL (and derivatives) the packages are named as ipa-*. Given that command line interface is in all cases 'ipa', it seems like a inconsistency. Are there any reasons not to rename freeipa-* *packages* to ipa-*? Naturally name of project would still be FreeIPA :-) This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora. Have a nice day! -- Petr^2 Spacek -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
Re: [Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server?
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Petr Spacek wrote: Hello users and developers, I wonder what do you think about naming inconsistency in FreeIPA packages. Packages in Fedora are prefixed with freeipa-* but in RHEL (and derivatives) the packages are named as ipa-*. Given that command line interface is in all cases 'ipa', it seems like a inconsistency. Are there any reasons not to rename freeipa-* *packages* to ipa-*? Naturally name of project would still be FreeIPA :-) This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora. Not again. ;) It was 'ipa' package in Fedora first few years and got renamed to freeipa. -- / Alexander Bokovoy -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
[Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server?
Hello users and developers, I wonder what do you think about naming inconsistency in FreeIPA packages. Packages in Fedora are prefixed with freeipa-* but in RHEL (and derivatives) the packages are named as ipa-*. Given that command line interface is in all cases 'ipa', it seems like a inconsistency. Are there any reasons not to rename freeipa-* *packages* to ipa-*? Naturally name of project would still be FreeIPA :-) This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora. Have a nice day! -- Petr^2 Spacek -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
Re: [Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server?
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora. Wouldn't rpm Provides solve this particular issue? -- Jan Pazdziora Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
Re: [Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server?
On (17/07/15 11:15), Jan Pazdziora wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora. Wouldn't rpm Provides solve this particular issue? I would prefer this way as well. and BTW packages in debian use names: freeipa-* https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sidsearchon=nameskeywords=freeipa LS -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
Re: [Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server?
Regarding this, I think the upgrade from freeipa to ipa should be looked into carefully, since I experienced problem o post-upgrade script not being run upon upgrade from freeipa-*-4.0 to ipa-*-4.1 Nicola Il 17/07/15 11:10, Christopher Lamb ha scritto: Consistency sounds good. How would the name change affect yum update? Chris From: Petr Spacek pspa...@redhat.com To: freeipa-users@redhat.com Date: 17.07.2015 10:49 Subject:[Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server? Sent by:freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com Hello users and developers, I wonder what do you think about naming inconsistency in FreeIPA packages. Packages in Fedora are prefixed with freeipa-* but in RHEL (and derivatives) the packages are named as ipa-*. Given that command line interface is in all cases 'ipa', it seems like a inconsistency. Are there any reasons not to rename freeipa-* *packages* to ipa-*? Naturally name of project would still be FreeIPA :-) This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora. Have a nice day! -- Petr^2 Spacek -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project -- Nicola Canepa Tel: +39-0522-399-3474 canep...@mmfg.it --- Il contenuto della presente comunicazione è riservato e destinato esclusivamente ai destinatari indicati. Nel caso in cui sia ricevuto da persona diversa dal destinatario sono proibite la diffusione, la distribuzione e la copia. Nel caso riceveste la presente per errore, Vi preghiamo di informarci e di distruggerlo e/o cancellarlo dal Vostro computer, senza utilizzare i dati contenuti. La presente comunicazione (comprensiva dei documenti allegati) non avrà valore di proposta contrattuale e/o accettazione di proposte provenienti dal destinatario, nè rinuncia o riconoscimento di diritti, debiti e/o crediti, nè sarà impegnativa, qualora non sia sottoscritto successivo accordo da chi può validamente obbligarci. Non deriverà alcuna responsabilità precontrattuale a ns. carico, se la presente non sia seguita da contratto sottoscritto dalle parti. The content of the above communication is strictly confidential and reserved solely for the referred addressees. In the event of receipt by persons different from the addressee, copying, alteration and distribution are forbidden. If received by mistake we ask you to inform us and to destroy and/or delete from your computer without using the data herein contained. The present message (eventual annexes inclusive) shall not be considered a contractual proposal and/or acceptance of offer from the addressee, nor waiver recognizance of rights, debts and/or credits, nor shall it be binding when not executed as a subsequent agreement by persons who could lawfully represent us. No pre-contractual liability shall apply to us when the present communication is not followed by any binding agreement between the parties. -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
Re: [Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)? freeipa-server - ipa-server?
Hi, (writing this offline, so maybe my reply is moot...) On Freitag, 17. Juli 2015, Petr Spacek wrote: Are there any reasons not to rename freeipa-* *packages* to ipa-*? yes: in Debian and Ubuntu the packages are named freeipa-* as well, so let me phrase your question differently: are there any reasons not to rename ipa-* *packages* to freeipa-*? :-) Naturally name of project would still be FreeIPA :-) which would also have the nice benefit of matching the project name! cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
