Ludwig,
> I looked into the logs, I think the messages are harmless, just an effect of
> csn adjustment due to time difference on the two machines. I had said that
> the replication protocol will try to adjust the csn generator, but looks
> like you have long lasting replication connections and
Thanks,
I looked into the logs, I think the messages are harmless, just an
effect of csn adjustment due to time difference on the two machines. I
had said that the replication protocol will try to adjust the csn
generator, but looks like you have long lasting replication connections
and the
Ludwig,
> you still only grep the replication connection, but before being replicated
> the entry has to be added by some client connection, can you get all
> references to the entry ?
> the log snippet you provide shows also csns with tag=103, which indicate a
> MOD, are these MODs for the added
On 08/18/2016 05:28 PM, John Desantis wrote:
Ludwig,
unfortunately this is not enough to determine what is going on. The
intersting generated/used csn is only logged in the
corresponding RESULT message and these are only the replication connections,
it would be necessary to see the
original
Ludwig,
> unfortunately this is not enough to determine what is going on. The
> intersting generated/used csn is only logged in the
> corresponding RESULT message and these are only the replication connections,
> it would be necessary to see the
> original ADD operation, was it added once or
On 08/18/2016 03:15 PM, John Desantis wrote:
Ludwig,
Thank you for your response!
This is a normal scenario, but you could check if the simultaneous updates
on 4 and 16 are intentional.
In regards to the simultaneous updates, the only items I have noted so far are:
* The time sync between
Ludwig,
Thank you for your response!
> This is a normal scenario, but you could check if the simultaneous updates
> on 4 and 16 are intentional.
In regards to the simultaneous updates, the only items I have noted so far are:
* The time sync between the master (4) and replica (16) was off by
On 08/17/2016 08:54 PM, John Desantis wrote:
Hello all,
We've been re-using old host names and IP addresses for a new
deployment of nodes, and recently I've been seeing the messages pasted
below in the slapd-DC.DC.DC "error" log on our nodes.
[17/Aug/2016:10:30:30 -0400] -
Hello all,
We've been re-using old host names and IP addresses for a new
deployment of nodes, and recently I've been seeing the messages pasted
below in the slapd-DC.DC.DC "error" log on our nodes.
[17/Aug/2016:10:30:30 -0400] - replica_generate_next_csn:
opcsn=57b475cd00120004 <=
