Hi,
(writing this offline, so maybe my reply is moot...)
On Freitag, 17. Juli 2015, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Are there any reasons not to rename freeipa-* *packages* to ipa-*?
yes: in Debian and Ubuntu the packages are named freeipa-* as well, so let me
phrase your question differently: are there a
On (17/07/15 11:15), Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>
>> This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need
>> to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora.
>
>Wouldn't rpm Provides solve this particular issue?
>
name change affect yum update?
Chris
From: Petr Spacek
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Date: 17.07.2015 10:49
Subject:[Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)?
freeipa-server -> ipa-server?
Sent by:freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com
Hello us
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>
> This rename would remove the inconsistency which drives me crazy when I need
> to script something universally for RHEL and Fedora.
Wouldn't rpm Provides solve this particular issue?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engi
Consistency sounds good.
How would the name change affect yum update?
Chris
From: Petr Spacek
To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
Date: 17.07.2015 10:49
Subject:[Freeipa-users] Rename or not to rename (packages only)?
freeipa-server -> ipa-server?
Sent by:free
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello users and developers,
I wonder what do you think about naming inconsistency in FreeIPA packages.
Packages in Fedora are prefixed with freeipa-* but in RHEL (and derivatives)
the packages are named as ipa-*. Given that command line interface is in al
Hello users and developers,
I wonder what do you think about naming inconsistency in FreeIPA packages.
Packages in Fedora are prefixed with freeipa-* but in RHEL (and derivatives)
the packages are named as ipa-*. Given that command line interface is in all
cases 'ipa', it seems like a inconsisten
