Re: [Freeipa-users] Limiting group/user visibility

2011-12-02 Thread david t. klein
I think, rather than replicating your admin accounts, have a separate admin realm, and then have all customer realms trust your admin realm, and use those credentials. -DTK -- david t. klein Cisco Certified Network Associate (CSCO11281885) Linux Professional Institute Certification (LPI00016

[Freeipa-users] IMPORTANT: Your input requested: SSSD LDAP Provider vs Winbind

2011-12-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
When we originally designed SSSD, we looked at it as a solution for dealing with LDAP and Kerberos identity and authentication for Linux and UNIX clients. With our initial approach, we decided to include only marginal support for Microsoft's Active Directory as a source of user information (only su

Re: [Freeipa-users] IMPORTANT: Your input requested: SSSD LDAP Provider vs Winbind

2011-12-02 Thread Ondrej Valousek
My story is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652609 And it seems to go nowhere. So, in quick - I still believe winbind is a piece of crap really (Simo forgives) for the reasons outlined above in the link. For the same reasons I believe you, SSSD engineers, are wasting your tim

Re: [Freeipa-users] IMPORTANT: Your input requested: SSSD LDAP Provider vs Winbind

2011-12-02 Thread Ondrej Valousek
Small update so I am not only throwing dirt on winbind: Winbind has still its use if you can not use / do not have RFC2307 attributes in AD. So simply, if you want to use RFC2307 attributes, sssd is here for you. If not, go for winbind. But yet I would not bother about winbind plugin for sssd a

Re: [Freeipa-users] IMPORTANT: Your input requested: SSSD LDAP Provider vs Winbind

2011-12-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 15:59 +0100, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Small update so I am not only throwing dirt on winbind: > > Winbind has still its use if you can not use / do not have RFC2307 > attributes in AD. > So simply, if you want to use RFC2307 attributes, sssd is here for > you. If not, go for

Re: [Freeipa-users] IMPORTANT: Your input requested: SSSD LDAP Provider vs Winbind

2011-12-02 Thread Ondrej Valousek
On 12/02/2011 04:06 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: 1) SSSD caching instead of nscd Winbind has its own cache. We do not want to implement the yet another one causing confusion, do we? 2) Support for multiple AD domains without trust If needed, winbind itself should provide this functionality.

Re: [Freeipa-users] Limiting group/user visibility

2011-12-02 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 08:01 -0600, david t. klein wrote: > I think, rather than replicating your admin accounts, have a separate admin > realm, and then have all customer realms trust your admin realm, and use > those credentials. In future this will be an easier way. But right now trust relation

Re: [Freeipa-users] IMPORTANT: Your input requested: SSSD LDAP Provider vs Winbind

2011-12-02 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 10:06 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 15:59 +0100, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > > Small update so I am not only throwing dirt on winbind: > > > > Winbind has still its use if you can not use / do not have RFC2307 > > attributes in AD. > > So simply, if yo