On ma, 01 touko 2017, Peter Fern wrote:
On 01/05/17 22:15, Peter Fern wrote:
On 01/05/17 22:08, Peter Fern wrote:
On 27/12/16 23:32, Martin Basti wrote:
It is not a user, it is a SPAM bot mining public archives. We don't
have any control about it we can just un-publish archives (tested,
spam s
On 01/05/17 22:15, Peter Fern wrote:
> On 01/05/17 22:08, Peter Fern wrote:
>> On 27/12/16 23:32, Martin Basti wrote:
>>> It is not a user, it is a SPAM bot mining public archives. We don't
>>> have any control about it we can just un-publish archives (tested,
>>> spam stopped after that) but they
On 01/05/17 22:08, Peter Fern wrote:
> On 27/12/16 23:32, Martin Basti wrote:
>> It is not a user, it is a SPAM bot mining public archives. We don't
>> have any control about it we can just un-publish archives (tested,
>> spam stopped after that) but they contain a lot of information for users.
> I
On 27/12/16 23:32, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 27.12.2016 13:22, Outback Dingo wrote:
>> Im still getting nude porn spam emails and pics from a user
>>
>> Kimi Rachel
>>
>
> It is not a user, it is a SPAM bot mining public archives. We don't
> have any control about it we can just un-publish arch
Yes, I am aware of the workarounds, and went through the exact same steps
that you mentioned several times. This is clearly not a solution. Can
someone from the team comment on why email addresses are published in the
first place ? I do not see any advantages and plenty of disadvantages. Spam
notwi
On 24 April 2017 at 12:24, Prasun Gera wrote:
> That doesn't work very well. The spam bots use different emails. And gmail
> marks the entire message thread as spam, not just the spam reply.
>
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Dewangga Bachrul Alam <
> dewangg...@xtremenitro.org> wrote:
>
>> ---
That doesn't work very well. The spam bots use different emails. And gmail
marks the entire message thread as spam, not just the spam reply.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Dewangga Bachrul Alam <
dewangg...@xtremenitro.org> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Mark as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark as spam, and they gone from my inbox. :)
On 04/23/2017 05:10 PM, Prasun Gera wrote:
> This still continues to be a problem. Was any solution identified
> for this ? Why are the emails not obfuscated on the public archives
> ?
>
> On Tue, Dec 2
This still continues to be a problem. Was any solution identified for this
? Why are the emails not obfuscated on the public archives ?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
>
>
> On 27.12.2016 13:22, Outback Dingo wrote:
>
>> Im still getting nude porn spam emails and pics from a
On 27.12.2016 13:22, Outback Dingo wrote:
Im still getting nude porn spam emails and pics from a user
Kimi Rachel
It is not a user, it is a SPAM bot mining public archives. We don't have
any control about it we can just un-publish archives (tested, spam
stopped after that) but they conta
10 matches
Mail list logo