Hi,
Guy Davies a écrit :
Hi Alan,
The supplicant is the software on the device trying to connect, rather
than the server. Unless FreeRADIUS has moved in a totally different
direction from when I was using it frequently, it is purely a RADIUS
server (the authentication server in the 802.1x
On Dec 4, 2007 1:19 PM, Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pungki arianto wrote:
How can I create clear text password for user? Is there any
documentation that I have to read for setting that?
Yes. Lots. The FAQ, config files, etc.
I read the FAQ from
On Dec 4, 2007 10:32 AM, pungki arianto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the FAQ from
http://wiki.freeradius.org/index.php/FAQ#Debugging_it_yourself
but the Cleartext-Password attribute is only for freeradius 1.1.6 / 1.1.7 or
2.0.0pre2. I'm using freeRadius 1.1.2 and Cleartext-Password
Is there any further HOWTO or somebody who can give me detailed instruction
on how to get PEAP authentication done with a WinXP Client? I've installed
the microsoft hotfix for SP2, but I don't see what to do with this
xpextensions file.
Thanks in advance - Bernd
-
List
Place it in the /certs directory. It will be used by CA.all script to
generate certificates usable with XP supplicant.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 4/12/2007, Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
Is there any further HOWTO or somebody who can give me detailed instruction
on how to get PEAP
Bernd wrote:
Is there any further HOWTO or somebody who can give me detailed instruction
on how to get PEAP authentication done with a WinXP Client? I've installed
the microsoft hotfix for SP2, but I don't see what to do with this
xpextensions file.
See the Wiki and the comments in
John Paul wrote:
The issue is that if a machine is authenticated and the server that
did the authentication is down, the switch will contact the other server
and the EAP conversation will fail, causing authentication to fail.
Research indicates that this is because the client and server have
John Paul wrote:
When I tested this the first time, authentications to server 1 worked
and to server 2 did not. When I couldn't figure it out, I turned the
test machines off and left for the day. The next day I had server 1
turned off - I turned the test machines on and authentications to
Debug the switch. It's quite likely that it isn't marking the radius
server that is down as dead but it tries it again when it recieves the
challenge.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik informatika ISP
Dana 4/12/2007, John Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
John Paul wrote:
The issue is that if a machine is
FreeRADIUS does not do session resumption. If the supplicant tries to
do session resumption, I don't know what will happen. You should ensure
that the supplicant has session resumption disabled.
Windows does support it but it's switched off by default and I have verified
this
John Paul wrote:
John Paul wrote:
The issue is that if a machine is authenticated and the server
that did the authentication is down, the switch will contact the
other server and the EAP conversation will fail, causing
authentication to fail. Research indicates that this is because
the client
Hi,
Is it possible to altogether avoid authenticate
section and just do ldap lookups in the authorize
section?
authorize {
ldap {
notfound = reject
}
}
The problem is in the authenticate section, radius
gets the userDN from the authorize and tries to bind
ldap with password which
Denise Fernandes
WG-TEL
FCCN
Av. do Brasil, n.º 101 - Lisboa
Telef. +351 218440100 Fax +351 218472167
www.fccn.pt BLOCKED::http://www.fccn.pt/
Aviso de Confidencialidade
Esta mensagem é exclusivamente destinada ao seu destinatário, podendo conter
informação CONFIDENCIAL, cuja
Thanks so much Phil. I am using freeradius-1.0.4
I am going to install the latest version and will try
your suggestion.
Thanks and Regards.
Eric.
--- Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Martell wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to altogether avoid authenticate
section and just do ldap
Phil Mayers wrote:
There are patches to enable this, but they have not, as yet, been
integrated. In any case, they won't help you to fail over from one
server to another.
If/when those patches get integrated, it would be highly useful to
support failover between servers. I guess the
On 12/4/2007 at 10:01 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debug the switch. It's quite likely that it isn't marking the radius
server that is down as dead but it tries it again when it recieves the
challenge.
Bingo, we have a winner. The switch was attempting to contact
16 matches
Mail list logo
