Hi,
Ah... a fix wasn't pulled over from v3.0.x to master. I've just done
that now.
server now starts with such switch/case config present. cheers!
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I think I know the answer to this question but I wanted to check with the Gurus!
Does FreeRADIUS give a fig about what the username is? If it were all numeric,
say 123456789 I guess it is happy with that? It's just a string to FreeRADIUS?
If there was to be an issue, it would be the back end
Thank both, that's great news.
I really need to teach myself some C..
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From:
freeradius-users-bounces+andy.franks=sath.nhs...@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+andy.franks=sath.nhs.uk@lists.freeradiu
s.org] On Behalf Of
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:41:07PM +0100, Fabrizio Vecchi wrote:
As you can see, the device wasn't listed in the file, the authentication
went fine, saying that the tunnel that I should get has ID 40, but that
wasn't overwritten by the authorized_macs check...
Add
DEFAULT Auth-Type := Reject
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:40:19AM +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:41:07PM +0100, Fabrizio Vecchi wrote:
As you can see, the device wasn't listed in the file, the authentication
went fine, saying that the tunnel that I should get has ID 40, but that
wasn't
Hi,
Does FreeRADIUS give a fig about what the username is? If it were all
numeric, say 123456789 I guess it is happy with that? It's just a string
to FreeRADIUS?
FreeRADIUS is just a RADIUS serverand hence any decisions made by it are
all down to defined policies. so if you have
Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer wrote:
Hi again,
Sorry to bang on about this, but I'm struggling still.
Brand new machine, Ubuntu 13.04 server, never had freeradius installed
on it. Pulled from git, - (FreeRADIUS Version 3.1.0 (git #209982d),
I didn't see the 3.1.0... At this
Hi list,
we use freeradius for our dsl user authentication.
We want to disconnect some users via radius at fixed times, e.g. 04:00 am.
Which attribute and value should / can i use?
Session-Timeout doesnt do the job.
Regards,
Volker Lieder
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
On 10/10/13 15:03, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Samba 4 is lurvely... apparently 100% compatible with existing AD
installations, although, as always, it's a bit finicky and info is a bit thin on
the ground (and I've not written up a guide when I set my test environment up that
uses an S4
On 14 Oct 2013, at 15:52, Volker Lieder v.lie...@uvensys.de wrote:
Hi list,
we use freeradius for our dsl user authentication.
We want to disconnect some users via radius at fixed times, e.g. 04:00 am.
Which attribute and value should / can i use?
Session-Timeout doesnt do the job.
All,
Seems that the return code priority is behaving different in 3.0 -
specifically the following config:
authorize {
updated
files
if (noop) {
...
}
}
...gives:
(0) authorize {
(0) [updated] = updated
(0) [files] = noop
(0) ? if (noop)
(0) ? if (noop) - FALSE
i.e.
On 14/10/13 16:01, Jonathan Gazeley wrote:
On 10/10/13 15:03, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Samba 4 is lurvely... apparently 100% compatible with existing AD
installations, although, as always, it's a bit finicky and info is a
bit thin on the ground (and I've not written up a guide when I set
Hi,
we tried to calculate it via expr.
How would you calculate it?
Regards,
Volker
Am 14.10.2013 um 17:03 schrieb Arran Cudbard-Bell:
On 14 Oct 2013, at 15:52, Volker Lieder v.lie...@uvensys.de wrote:
Hi list,
we use freeradius for our dsl user authentication.
We want to
On 14 Oct 2013, at 16:27, Volker Lieder v.lie...@uvensys.de wrote:
Hi,
we tried to calculate it via expr.
How would you calculate it?
Pretty sure the expiration module does exactly this.
Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org
FreeRADIUS Development Team
-
List
On 14/10/13 16:18, Phil Mayers wrote:
i.e. the noop from the files module is ignored. This is a change from
2.x where the most recent module return code can be checked.
Have I missed the change, or is this not intentional?
Looks like this happened in the modcall.c rewrite (d0aa96709cea)
On 14/10/13 17:15, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 14/10/13 16:18, Phil Mayers wrote:
i.e. the noop from the files module is ignored. This is a change from
2.x where the most recent module return code can be checked.
Have I missed the change, or is this not intentional?
Looks like this happened in
We have our freeradius setup to authenticate with Active Directory for
EAP. Currently, it uses the samaccountname but we want to use UPN instead.
We get NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER when testing with ntlm through command line.
ntlm_auth --request-nt-key --domain=test.local --username=tu...@pub.com
Angelica Delgado wrote:
We have our freeradius setup to authenticate with Active Directory for
EAP. Currently, it uses the samaccountname but we want to use UPN
instead. We get NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER when testing with ntlm through
command line.
ntlm_auth --request-nt-key
You might want to do an LDAP lookup first on your UPN to find the
samAccountName, then use that with ntlm_auth.
Stefan
From: freeradius-users-bounces+stefan.paetow=diamond.ac...@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+stefan.paetow=diamond.ac...@lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf
19 matches
Mail list logo
