updated you after I tried the "load-balance" in the
accounting section back in early December - well, it was working perfectly
well...
Bruno Lague
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>>> threading sound like an idea yes. Another idea is to get load-balancing
>> code
>>> inside freeradius. Then you could do something like the following:
>>> accounting {
>>> loadbalance {
>>> relay_detail1
>>> relay_detail2
>
> I 've been working on a few changes to radrelay, mainly regarding making
the
> sleep time configurable and adding a few more things. The changes have
been
> made
> in radsqlrelay initialy but they 'll go in radrelay also. That won't
change
> your
> numbers but at least make a few things configur
> Kostas Kalevras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That value should be configurable at some point. It was selected
> > somewhat large so that radrelay didn't create problems to slow
> > radius servers when it started sending a large detail file.
>
> It should instead send packets as fast as the s
Hi,
I want to use radrelay as described in the doc for accounting replication.
My testing so far shows that, functionally, it works well. I'm experiencing
a
glitch in speed though. Here is a short description of the problem:
- Normally, both radiusd and radrelay are running on two servers, RS1 an
5 matches
Mail list logo
