use a weaker mechanism.
Regards,
Guy
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Amos Gregory
> Sent: 31 August 2004 21:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OT] Should anyone even use LEAP
>
>
> ASL
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] Should anyone even use LEAP
Adam Shelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just wondering, would this type of setup still be vulnerable to
this:
>
> http://asleap.sourceforge.net/
>
> Should LEAP be used in any production environment to ensure se
CTED]
> Subject: [OT] Should anyone even use LEAP
>
>
> Coates Carter wrote:
>
> > James,
> >
> > We have gotten LEAP to work with Cisco access points. My
> last posting
> > on the subject might help if you haven't gotten there yet...
> >
&
Yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan
DeKok
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] Should anyone even use LEAP
Adam Shelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just wondering, would thi
Adam Shelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just wondering, would this type of setup still be vulnerable to this:
>
> http://asleap.sourceforge.net/
>
> Should LEAP be used in any production environment to ensure security on
> wireless links?
It's no more vulnerable than MS-CHAP, except t
Coates Carter wrote:
James,
We have gotten LEAP to work with Cisco access points. My last posting
on the subject might help if you haven't gotten there yet...
I was just wondering, would this type of setup still be vulnerable to this:
http://asleap.sourceforge.net/
Should LEAP be used in any pr
6 matches
Mail list logo