John McKinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps a silly question, but if I wanted to allow ftp access to an nfs
> mounted partition for authenticated users only, will this work? Meaning
> the users do not have a local account, the radius client is on the local
> machine and the radius server
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Toby Zimmerer wrote:
Perhaps a silly question, but if I wanted to allow ftp access to an nfs
mounted partition for authenticated users only, will this work? Meaning
the users do not have a local account, the radius client is on the local
machine and the radius server is a d
a user, then su to the ROOT account.
>
> >From: Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
> >To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
> >Subject: Re: RADIUS and PAM configuration help--RESOLVED with solution
> >po
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
> >To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
> >Subject: Re: RADIUS and PAM configuration help--RESOLVED with solution
> >posted
> >Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:22:30 -0600
> >
> >Will this all
nd PAM configuration help--RESOLVED with solution
posted
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:22:30 -0600
Will this allow root login??
Brock
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:52:29 -0800, Toby Zimmerer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alright! I figured this whole thing out! I switched over to the
> pam_radius
Will this allow root login??
Brock
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:52:29 -0800, Toby Zimmerer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alright! I figured this whole thing out! I switched over to the
> pam_radius_auth module (Sept 2003) to tie PAM into an existing RADIUS
> server. The difference with tying RADIUS
Alright! I figured this whole thing out! I switched over to the
pam_radius_auth module (Sept 2003) to tie PAM into an existing RADIUS
server. The difference with tying RADIUS in with Redhat ES is that each
module tha links to PAM has a separate module under the /etc/pam.d
directory. You mus
7 matches
Mail list logo