Re: NAS devices

Mitchell, Michael J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've already done some work to get this working, its pretty much finished, but I'll try to do finish it off in the next couple of week... But in the meantime I can provide some patches? Sure, please put them on bugs.freeradius.org I think

RE: NAS devices

Sounds great mike. I understand from what you are saying that this is just not working the way I thought it would. I look forward to seeing your patches. I like the sound of alans idea about hunt groups do you think you could give us your thoughts on this. These features would be used by a lot

Re: NAS devices

Alan DeKok wrote: Mitchell, Michael J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've already done some work to get this working, its pretty much finished, but I'll try to do finish it off in the next couple of week... But in the meantime I can provide some patches? Sure, please put them on bugs.freeradius.org

Re: NAS devices

alan walters wrote: Sounds great mike. I understand from what you are saying that this is just not working the way I thought it would. I look forward to seeing your patches. OK, how did you think it might work? Always willing to do things a better way... cheers, Mike - List

RE: NAS devices huntgroups

I agree entirely with the huntgroups ordering. I was considering simplifying the idea a little. (1) Have a limited number of hunt groups and have more Groups in the users file. (2) for example order your ldapgroup entries my NAS. And add the priority feature to here.(the only reason that I

RE: NAS devices

I've already done some work to get this working, its pretty much finished, but I'll try to do finish it off in the next couple of week... But in the meantime I can provide some patches? I think there's also been patches added to provide hooks to check for a client in a database at authentication