of Technology
On 05/23/2013 12:47 AM, Elizabeth Fife wrote:
HI I am having problems authenticating client computers onto the
wireless network using a Cisco AP1252 via FreeRadius 2.1.10 on Ubuntu
12.04.2 serves
Setup:
I have a Cisco AP1252 wireless Access Point connected to a Cisco
ASA5510
Elizabeth Fife wrote:
HI I am having problems authenticating client computers onto the
wireless network using a Cisco AP1252 via FreeRadius 2.1.10 on Ubuntu
12.04.2 serves
You should upgrade to 2.2.0, but that likely won't fix the problem.
Problem:
When a wireless user tries to connect
HI I am having problems authenticating client computers onto the wireless
network using a Cisco AP1252 via FreeRadius 2.1.10 on Ubuntu 12.04.2 serves
Setup:
I
have a Cisco AP1252 wireless Access Point connected to a Cisco ASA5510
on subnet X.X.5.ZThe access point ip address is X.X.5.101
Hi all.
I have posted my query at
*
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=4527255posted=1#post4527255
*
but think that it might be more relevant at this list. Anyways, I will be
grateful for help from either side :-|
For brevity, here is the query detail ::
Hi all.
Let me
On 11/18/2011 03:02 AM, Ajay Garg wrote:
*a. That I continue to need the two-jack-wire, so as to provide a
network-communication medium between the router, and the Freeradius
server (which is running on my F14-laptop).
The access point needs a network connection for two primary purposes, 1)
encrypted? I'm
using FR 2.1.8 + OpenLDAP 2.4.21. I'm trying configure FR to
authenticate users in wireless network.
This is my debug output. When I try a radtest with login/pass from the
users file I don't get warning, but LDAP
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org
Hi,
The document you gave is good, except for the client certificate part. I
don't want to have to give certificates out to everyone on my wireless
network. Is there a way to get around this?
err no. EAP-TLS uses client and server certificates. if you want to use
just the server cert
Hi,
network, mac xp. I wouldn't mind using plain text passwords if that could
be forced. The only configurations that get close to working get as far as
machapv2, then fail because of no nt/lm password. If I could use the
password from my ldap connection which seems to be working nicely,
network, mac xp. I wouldn't mind using plain text passwords if that could
be forced. The only configurations that get close to working get as far as
machapv2, then fail because of no nt/lm password. If I could use the
password from my ldap connection which seems to be working nicely,
Hello all,
I'm looking for a simple way to protect access to my wireless network. I'm
seeing a lot of old documentation on how to use EAP-TLS to protect the
wireless network. I've found lots of old documentation on how to setup WPA
Enterprise. I would like some updated docuentation on how to do
simplest, don't turn it on.
On 9/18/07, Kent Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking for a simple way to protect access to my wireless
network. I'm
seeing a lot of old documentation on how to use EAP-TLS to protect the
wireless network. I've found lots of old documentation
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 08:13 -0600, Kent Thomas wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking for a simple way to protect access to my wireless network. I'm
seeing a lot of old documentation on how to use EAP-TLS to protect the
wireless network. I've found lots of old documentation on how to setup WPA
Phil,
Thanks a million for the reply. You are the first to actually reply with
some info for me to look at.
The document you gave is good, except for the client certificate part. I
don't want to have to give certificates out to everyone on my wireless
network. Is there a way to get around
for the client certificate part. I
don't want to have to give certificates out to everyone on my wireless
network. Is there a way to get around this?
Thanks a million.
Kent
On 9/18/07 4:01 PM, Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 08:13 -0600, Kent Thomas wrote:
Hello all,
I'm
certificates out to everyone on my wireless
network. Is there a way to get around this?
Thanks a million.
Kent
On 9/18/07 4:01 PM, Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 08:13 -0600, Kent Thomas wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking for a simple way to protect access
part. I
don't want to have to give certificates out to everyone on my wireless
network. Is there a way to get around this?
Thanks a million.
Kent
On 9/18/07 4:01 PM, Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 08:13 -0600, Kent Thomas wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking
I have more info.. I turned on debugging on the Radius Server and this is what
I saw..
EAP-Message = 0x03030004
Message-Authenticator = 0x
State = 0x4432dbd90b6b53254567784c2809c028
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 10.0.x.x:1645, id=195,
I have more info.. I turned on debugging on the Radius Server and this is what
I saw..
EAP-Message = 0x03030004
Message-Authenticator = 0x
State = 0x4432dbd90b6b53254567784c2809c028
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 10.0.x.x:1645, id=195,
Richard Elder wrote:
I have more info.. I turned on debugging on the Radius Server and this
is what I saw..
...
rlm_eap: Either EAP-request timed out OR EAP-response to an unknown
EAP-request
The supplicant is broken.
But then I use a newer wireless NIC, and it works perfectly..
shrug
I have run across a number of machines that seem to have a problem
authenticating to the radius server via Cisco 1200 AP using LEAP. All the
newer Cisco/Intel cards don't have a problem with current or recent drivers,
but a model of Atheros and Belkin drivers that have a copyright date of
I try to use FreeRADIUS for building 801.1X EAP-TLS authorization. I
want to use only computer certificates (not user ones) on WinXP. such
certificates contains FQDN of client in `commonName' field.
But WinXP/SP2 sent `User-Name' in such case as `host/FQDN'. And
checking of commonName
i want to unable people connecting with same login more than one time in
a wireless network with cisco AP1100
first when i use radcheck i have reults like that :
checkrad -d cisco 195.220.107.35 981 SNMP 0
snmpget: /usr/bin/snmpget -r 1 -t 5 -v2c -c 'xxx'
195.220.107.35
hi
i read mail on the list which seems to give me response ( no :( ) but i
want to be sure
is it possible to affect ip address with radius ippool or with users
file in a wireless network ( cisco AP 1100 )
thanks
basile
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list
You can use a wireless access point that supports 802.1q. I know that
the HP J8130A WAP 420 supports this, and I believe the Cisco's and some
3Com do as well.
Assign your private network users some additional attributes. For
example, the following 3 additional attributes will direct the WAP to
Hi all,
I'm trying to use freeradius to connect users to a private network or to
Internet through an AP of a Wireless LAN. A user gets an account for private
network connection or Internet connection. Internet is ok, but I tried different
ways to make him having a private network connection (and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Internet is ok, but I tried different
ways to make him having a private network connection (and just that) and
it doesn't work because there's an AP between the user and Radius cabled
LAN.
Any ideas?
Set up routing on the AP for the private network.
Alan DeKok.
On 23 Sep 2004 at 10:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use freeradius to connect users to a private network or to
Internet through an AP of a Wireless LAN. A user gets an account for private
network connection or Internet connection. Internet is ok, but I tried different
ways to make
Hi all and thanks for the answers,
I'll explain in a better way.
I would like to have:
a user A who can access to Internet with username A and password A (and
that's ok, it works); a user B who can access to Private Network (no
Internet) with username B and password B. Both connecting to the
On 23 Sep 2004 at 23:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll explain in a better way.
[ snip: scenario ]
Have the RADIUS server give different IP addresses to users A and B. Have a
firewall somewhere between the private network and the Internet that will deny
Internet traffic to someone whose IP
Kostas Kalevras wrote :
Thanks to you and Artur Hecker for your responses that helped me.
I chose to implement PEAP and EAP-TTLS on freeradius in order to have a
wide support for Mac OS X and Windows 2000/XP.
As I want to use LDAP to authenticate users; I may be able to use:
- PAP
- EAP-GTC
-
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Christophe Boyanique wrote:
Kostas Kalevras wrote :
Thanks to you and Artur Hecker for your responses that helped me.
I chose to implement PEAP and EAP-TTLS on freeradius in order to have a
wide support for Mac OS X and Windows 2000/XP.
As I want to use LDAP to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2004 17:53 schrieb Christophe Boyanique:
Hello,
I want to secure a wireless network (operated with Cisco Aironet 1200
aps) via freeradius connected to an OpenLDAP server; with clients
running Windows 2000, Windows XP
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Christophe Boyanique wrote:
Hello,
I want to secure a wireless network (operated with Cisco Aironet 1200
aps) via freeradius connected to an OpenLDAP server; with clients
running Windows 2000, Windows XP and Mac OS-X (= 10.2).
I saw that EAP-MD5 is no recommended
hi
But will PAP be supported by supplicants running on Windows and Mac OS-X ?
If you are going to use EAP-TTLS you must use the SecureW2 client since windows
do not support EAP-TTLS. SecureW2 supports PAP so you should be fine. I have no
idea about MacOS X though since it's a unix flavor maybe
Title: Message
I am unable to get
PEAP working with WinXP (using MSChapV2) on my wireless network. I am using
Freeradius Version 1.0.0-pre1. For authenticationI am using
etc_smbpassword. I saw an earlier message in the archive stating that MSChap
wasn't supposed to be used
Bragg Mario-mbragg1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am unable to get PEAP working with WinXP (using MSChapV2) on my
wireless network. I am using Freeradius Version 1.0.0-pre1. For
authentication I am using etc_smbpassword.
Ok...
I saw an earlier message in the archive stating that MSChap wasn't
36 matches
Mail list logo
