RE: solved Re: compile issues on solaris 7

Hi Mike, i run into same issue. How do you changed it ? Well i could just ignore the stuff in line 355 inet_ntop with AF_INET6 but i don´t think this is smart. Bye Holger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Sent:

RE: Authentication for Cisco WDS?

Does only work with Cisco LEAP. And well i would be surpised if it would be possiple to somehow cach the EAP/TLS stuff to reuse them later ?! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matanya Elchanani Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004

RE: Is there some kind of trick to make Cisco LEAP work???

WLSE is brocken ? Is that still right or have you got it working ? Regards Holger Steppke -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Munroe Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 5:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

Re: ntlm_auth not working from within Freeradius with Domain in Username

Hi, this would then just strip of the Domainname from the --username parameter. So its lost. If possile i like to keep it eithere in the username or if i can get it in anothere variable (will check rlm_mschap if thee is one) to feed this into --domain. In case its Empty i could pace a Default

FW: Cisco WDS, WLSE and FreeRADIUS

Hi, has someone ever ask Cisco about that issue ?! If yes what was the answer? Buy Cisco ASC server ? Regards Holger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey C. Ollie Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:34 PM To:

-i and -p commandline options

Hi, in the man page i found the comment that this options are deprecated and listen/bind should be used. Just my sentence on this why to let them stay in the code :) I found such options very usfully maintaining same configuration across multiple redundand servers. So eg. Radiusd.conf could be

Re: Cisco WDS, WLSE and FreeRADIUS (SOLUTION!)

Hi, do you know if this is fixed in the wlse in the meantime ? I have to set this up in the next couple of days and like to prevent to have to different radius binaries one for the WDS/WLSE and one for the users :( If not i will talk to Cisco too :) Bye Holger Martin Hamilton schrieb:

configure --without-rlm_modulename dosn´t seam to work correctly

Hi, properly i´am to stupid to know why but if i run configure for 0.9.3 with quit some --whithout-rlm_modulename statements at the end Make.inc still has all modules listed. Which is bad for me because some that i not need are not compiling on my box so make doesn't finish. Well i edit it by

How to add attributes at post proxy stage ?

Hi, i´am movin away from Cistron and now having a issue with the different behavior both servers have. Ciston calls users twice once at the time sending the resquest and second when the answer from the home server is recievd. Could matche there then based on realms, usernames and wildcards. Wich

Multiple Taged Attributes

Hi, i think i wrote already on this list that i migrating from cistron to freeradius 0.9.3 so there i found anothere point i like to highlight. It is subject to discuss. maybe its wanted that way don´t know. Bascily adding multiple Attributes from the same name does work with += adding an

RE: How to add attributes at post proxy stage ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on : Holger Steppke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now i need same function with Freeradius. Well i think a post_proxy_authorize = yes would do and my usersfile is parsed again. Yes. That's what it's there fore. Is there a better way of doing it in freeradius

Huntgroup matching == vs !=

Hi, working alot on 0.9.3 at the moment, hope you not feel bothered to much of my many requests. This time i found something starnge regarding the huntgroup Matching. Lets says there is a huntgroup call foo with some ips and a lot of othere ips wich are not part of a huntgroup as they could

Tagged Attributes and attribute filter does not work correctly

Hi, like to bothere you again about Taged Attributes. (0.9.3) Its not like i complain about. I work arounded it differently vor myself but hopefully someone is intressed in seening this. If i add some more of those Attributes in the usersfile like Tunnel-Endpoint:1 += 1.2.3.4 Tunnel-Endpoint:2

RE: OS for FreeRADIUS

Hi, well don?t lmow how well it runs on the others. I run it on Solaris 2.6 and 2.8 and it works well. Bye Holger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on : Is there a recommended OS for freeradius? Is there really a difference (performance or otherwise) between running freeradius on FreeBSD

RE: groupreply per NAS

Look at the Huntgroup feature. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Sérgio José FerreiraSent: Freitag, 23. April 2004 15:30To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: groupreply per NAS Hello, How can I reply attributes per NAS ? If user login