Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-04-10 Thread Stefan Winter
Hi,

 I have 2 servers with identical hardware/software configs.
 Both servers hang at the same time.

 stopping/starting the daemon doesn't resolve the issue, rebooting the box
 does.

Well, in my case the server doesn't respond to a normal kill, so the 
start/stop scripts indeed wouldn't do the job. Have you tried killing it it 
with kill -SIGKILL instead of the init scripts? 

 I was assuming it had something to do with the sql module because that is
 where it paused (see: sql hangs, was (conflicts/duplicates need))

For me it's also somewhere within sql. I will run our server in valgrind this 
morning, as Alan suggested elsewhere in the thread. I hope it will be 
responsive enough so I can keep it running for a few hours until the error 
eventually occurs...

Greetings,

Stefan

-- 
Stefan WINTER

RESTENA Foundation - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de 
la Recherche
RD Engineer

6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     Tel.:     +352 424409-1
http://www.restena.lu               Fax:      +352 422473

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-04-10 Thread Peter Nixon
This definitely sounds like a problem with either your database server or your 
firewall. Most likely culprit is the firewall..

-Peter

On Mon 10 Apr 2006 13:43, Duane Cox wrote:
 My problem may indeed be with my init scripts, I'll look into that and
 verify the status of the daemon.

 And for the record, what I mean by hang is that the server doesn't
 segfault or coredump, it just pauses processing data...
 Give the server 30 seconds, or maybe even 2-3 minutes, then it will start
 processing packets again.

 If you can catch the server during this act and look at the debug, you can
 see that the sql module has hung.
 Now I don't know if this is the cause or the effect, maybe it means
 something to someone, I don't know.

 I am going to attempt to load some previous versoins on the secondary
 server to see if I can alleviate or pinpoint the problem.

 Thanks for the feedback.



 - Original Message -
 From: Stefan Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
 Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 1:13 AM
 Subject: Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

  Hi,
 
   I have 2 servers with identical hardware/software configs.
   Both servers hang at the same time.
  
   stopping/starting the daemon doesn't resolve the issue, rebooting the

 box

   does.
 
  Well, in my case the server doesn't respond to a normal kill, so the
  start/stop scripts indeed wouldn't do the job. Have you tried killing it

 it

  with kill -SIGKILL instead of the init scripts?
 
   I was assuming it had something to do with the sql module because that

 is

   where it paused (see: sql hangs, was (conflicts/duplicates need))
 
  For me it's also somewhere within sql. I will run our server in valgrind

 this

  morning, as Alan suggested elsewhere in the thread. I hope it will be
  responsive enough so I can keep it running for a few hours until the
  error eventually occurs...
 
  Greetings,
 
  Stefan
 
  --
  Stefan WINTER
 
  RESTENA Foundation - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et

 de

  la Recherche
  RD Engineer
 
  6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
  L-1359 Luxembourg
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: +352 424409-1
  http://www.restena.lu Fax: +352 422473
 
  -
  List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

-- 

Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc


pgpHiTSpmBbgE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-04-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Duane Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have 2 servers with identical hardware/software configs.
 Both servers hang at the same time.
 
 stopping/starting the daemon doesn't resolve the issue, rebooting the box 
 does.

  That's fairly bad.  I'm not sure how something in the application
layer could cause that.  Maybe an OS issue?  But then why would *both*
boxes hand at the *same* time?

 I was assuming it had something to do with the sql module because that is 
 where it paused (see: sql hangs, was (conflicts/duplicates need))

  Maybe a wider network issue?

  I'm just guessing here...

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-04-09 Thread Doug Hardie


On Apr 9, 2006, at 17:46, Alan DeKok wrote:


Duane Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have 2 servers with identical hardware/software configs.
Both servers hang at the same time.

stopping/starting the daemon doesn't resolve the issue, rebooting  
the box

does.


  That's fairly bad.  I'm not sure how something in the application
layer could cause that.  Maybe an OS issue?  But then why would *both*
boxes hand at the *same* time?

I was assuming it had something to do with the sql module because  
that is

where it paused (see: sql hangs, was (conflicts/duplicates need))


  Maybe a wider network issue?

  I'm just guessing here...


Check the times very closely.  They may be 10 seconds apart.  I had a  
problem with a module that was crashing.  The first request took out  
the primary server and then when it didn't respond, 10 seconds later  
it tried the backup and crashed it also.
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-04-08 Thread Duane Cox

I'm seeing the same thing here with 1.1.1.

I have 2 servers with identical hardware/software configs.
Both servers hang at the same time.

stopping/starting the daemon doesn't resolve the issue, rebooting the box 
does.


I was assuming it had something to do with the sql module because that is 
where it paused (see: sql hangs, was (conflicts/duplicates need))





- Original Message - 
From: King, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:24 AM
Subject: Version 1.1.1 stops responding



So I built 1.1.1 on Debian.

After a period of so many hours (variable) it stops responding.
(Sometimes 2hours, sometimes 16hours)

Now here's where it get's weird, (and makes me suspect it might not be
freeRADIUS at the root cause)


If I stop and restart the freeRADIUS service, it continues to ignore
RADIUS packets.

But if I restart the server (hard reboot) it works fine.  Till it stops
responding again.

Obviously this is not enough information to help you diagnose the
problem.  How do I gather that information?

The box is a 233 Pentium with 64 megs of ram.  Has about 15 AP's, with
around 100 users (not simultaneous, maybe 30 simultaneous)

So what's the suggested way of gathering more info?  Running debug mode
piping to a text file?

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-31 Thread Alan DeKok
Stefan Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I did it in -X mode, it segfaulted. The end of the -X output is:
...

  Could you do the same, but with core dumps enabled (ulimit -c
unlimited) and symbols?

  That would help a lot in tracking down the problem.

  Also, what OS you're running on, etc.

  Alan DeKok.
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-28 Thread Stuart Auchterlonie
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:37 -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:

 (gdb) info threads
 
   That *may* be enough.  What will also help (if you have symbols) is:
 
 (gdb) thread 1
 (gdb) bt
 (gdb) thread 2
 (gdb) bt
 (gdb) thread 3
 (gdb) bt
 ...
 

The easiest way of doing this is
(gdb) thread apply all bt

on other projects I work on, we normally use
(gdb) thread apply all bt full

to include all the local variable values as well

to save yourself a lot of cut and paste, before issuing the commands
to get all the information you should do

(gdb) set logging file somefilename
(gdb) set logging on

then all the command output will be sent to the logfile somefilename
as well as being displayed.


Stuart



   For each of the threads it talks about in info threads.
 
   Alan DeKok.
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 __
 This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
 For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
 __

===
Homechoice is a trading name of Video Networks Limited of 205 Holland Park 
Avenue, London W11 4XB and registered in England and Wales (No. 2740910).
This email may contain confidential and privileged information and is intended 
for the named or authorised recipients only.  If you are not the named or 
authorised recipient of this email, please note that any copying, distribution, 
disclosure or use of its contents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and then destroy it. 
The views expressed in this email are not necessarily those held by Video 
Networks Limited and we do not accept any liability for any action taken in 
reliance on the contents of this message.  We do not guarantee that the 
integrity of this email has been maintained, nor that it is free of viruses, 
interceptions or interference.

___
This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email 
Security System.
___
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Stuart Auchterlonie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The easiest way of doing this is
 (gdb) thread apply all bt
...

  Thanks.  I've updated doc/bugs with that information.

  Alan DeKok.
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-27 Thread King, Michael
Just for some reference (Trying to find commonalities):

What OS/Distro are you?

I'm Debian testing release

How did you Install?  (Prebuilt binary / created local package and install / 
install from source)

I created a local Debian package, and installed it.

What modules did you enable?
PEAP, TTLS, and TLS

What is your authentication source?

Using ntlm_auth against Active Directory 2003

What is your supplicant?
98% Windows XP built in supplicant.  The rest are Linux / Mac clients.


I wonder if this has something to do with this bug that got squashed

2006.03.20 v1.0.5, and v1.1.0 - A validation issue exists with the EAP-MSCHAPv2 
module in all versions from 1.0.0 (where the module first appeared) to 1.1.0. 
Insufficient input validation was being done in the EAP-MSCHAPv2 state machine. 
A malicious attacker could manipulate their EAP-MSCHAPv2 client state machine 
to potentially convince the server to bypass authentication checks. This 
bypassing could also result in the server crashing. We recommend that 
administrators upgrade immediately.

 -Original Message-
 From: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 g 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 adius.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Winter
 Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 1:49 AM
 To: FreeRadius users mailing list
 Subject: Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding
 
  Mine seg faulted as well..
  Here's the last few lines of the freeradius -X -A
 
  modcall: entering group authenticate for request 1002
rlm_eap: Request found, released from the list
rlm_eap: EAP/peap
rlm_eap: processing type peap
rlm_eap_peap: Authenticate
rlm_eap_tls: processing TLS
  rlm_eap_tls:  Length Included
eaptls_verify returned 11
 
 Interesting. This morning I encountered again that radiusd 
 was claiming to be still listening on its ports, but didn't 
 process anything any more. As other logs showed, someone 
 logged into an Access Point via TTLS at 8:22 and at 8:25 the 
 Nagios Monitoring system marked the RADIUS Server as 
 critical. Scan interval for Nagios is every three minutes. So 
 it could very well be that FreeRADIUS stopped processing 
 packets when it tried to do TTLS. Sounds similar to your 
 case, just that it didn't segfault. Note that we usually use 
 TTLS it several times a day, and FreeRADIUS shows this 
 behaviour only sporadically.
 I now reverted to 1.1.0 in the hope that it's better there. 
 The way it is now is... disturbing.
 
 Greetings,
 
 Stefan Winter
 
 --
 Stefan WINTER
 
 Stiftung RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education 
 Nationale et de la Recherche Ingenieur Forschung  Entwicklung
 
 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
 L-1359 Luxembourg
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     Tel.:     +352 424409-1 
 http://www.restena.lu                Fax:      +352 422473
 
 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-27 Thread Alan DeKok
Stefan Winter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting. This morning I encountered again that radiusd was claiming to be 
 still listening on its ports, but didn't process anything any more. As other 
 logs showed, someone logged into an Access Point via TTLS at 8:22 and at 8:25 
 the Nagios Monitoring system marked the RADIUS Server as critical. Scan 
 interval for Nagios is every three minutes. So it could very well be that 
 FreeRADIUS stopped processing packets when it tried to do TTLS. Sounds 
 similar to your case, just that it didn't segfault. Note that we usually use 
 TTLS it several times a day, and FreeRADIUS shows this behaviour only 
 sporadically.

  That's not nice.

 I now reverted to 1.1.0 in the hope that it's better there. The way
 it is now is... disturbing.

  I agree.

  I don't see why it's the case, either.  Maybe the re-arrangement of
SSL code from rlm_eap_tls to libeap broke it, but I don't see why.

  Until we can get more information about what's happening
(strace/ktrace, or gdb backtrace), there isn't much anyone can do to
fix it.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-27 Thread King, Michael
 -Original Message-
 From: 
 adius.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
 
   Until we can get more information about what's happening 
 (strace/ktrace, or gdb backtrace), there isn't much anyone 
 can do to fix it.

How would I create those traces?  (I'm looking for a suggested command
line, since I don't normally use those programs)

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-27 Thread Alan DeKok
King, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How would I create those traces?  (I'm looking for a suggested command
 line, since I don't normally use those programs)

  I'd suggest gdb, and do it in a testing environment if at all
possible, to avoid hitting your main server.  Also, you *must* have
symbols in the binary, meaning that the make install process can't
strip the binaries.  You may need to edit the Makefiles for this...

$ gdb radiusd
(gdb) set args -d ... - normal radiusd args
(gdb) run

  And when it stops responding, hit CTRL-C, and see what's up:

(gdb) info threads

  That *may* be enough.  What will also help (if you have symbols) is:

(gdb) thread 1
(gdb) bt
(gdb) thread 2
(gdb) bt
(gdb) thread 3
(gdb) bt
...

  For each of the threads it talks about in info threads.

  Alan DeKok.
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-27 Thread Alan DeKok
King, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I wonder if this has something to do with this bug that got squashed
 
 2006.03.20 v1.0.5, and v1.1.0 - A validation issue exists with the 
 EAP-MSCHAPv2 module

  No. EAP-MSCHAP doesn't do TLS, and that code change cannot affect
anything but people trying to attack the server.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-26 Thread Stefan Winter
 Mine seg faulted as well..
 Here's the last few lines of the freeradius -X -A

 modcall: entering group authenticate for request 1002
   rlm_eap: Request found, released from the list
   rlm_eap: EAP/peap
   rlm_eap: processing type peap
   rlm_eap_peap: Authenticate
   rlm_eap_tls: processing TLS
 rlm_eap_tls:  Length Included
   eaptls_verify returned 11

Interesting. This morning I encountered again that radiusd was claiming to be 
still listening on its ports, but didn't process anything any more. As other 
logs showed, someone logged into an Access Point via TTLS at 8:22 and at 8:25 
the Nagios Monitoring system marked the RADIUS Server as critical. Scan 
interval for Nagios is every three minutes. So it could very well be that 
FreeRADIUS stopped processing packets when it tried to do TTLS. Sounds 
similar to your case, just that it didn't segfault. Note that we usually use 
TTLS it several times a day, and FreeRADIUS shows this behaviour only 
sporadically.
I now reverted to 1.1.0 in the hope that it's better there. The way it is now 
is... disturbing.

Greetings,

Stefan Winter

-- 
Stefan WINTER

Stiftung RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de 
la Recherche
Ingenieur Forschung  Entwicklung

6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     Tel.:     +352 424409-1
http://www.restena.lu                Fax:      +352 422473

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-24 Thread King, Michael
I'm running it in debug mode  (and piping it to a file)

Freeradius -X -A crash.log

After a few hours this is what I got.

On the command line.

rad2:/home/mking# /usr/sbin/freeradius -X -A crash.log
Killed
rad2:/home/mking# 


The last few lines from the log file are
  rlm_eap: Request found, released from the list
  rlm_eap: EAP/peap
  rlm_eap: processing type peap
  rlm_eap_peap: Authenticate
  rlm_eap_tls: processing TLS
rlm_eap_tls:  Length Included
  eaptls_verify returned 11 
(other): before/accept initialization 
TLS_accept: before/accept initialization 
  rlm_eap_tls:  TLS 1.0 Handshake [length 0041], ClientHello  


And that's it?

Unfortunatly, I deleted the log file by mistake. (I really should drink
my coffee before typing)

I'm attempting to recreate it now.  It shouldn't be long, (I hope)

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-24 Thread Stefan Winter
Hi,

I have a follow-up as well. After configuring everything for doing SIGHUPs it 
turned out that after a SIGHUP, the process sits there and does nothing any 
more. 
When I did killall -HUP radiusd in non-debug mode, the process kept running, 
but didn't process anything any more.
When I did it in -X mode, it segfaulted. The end of the -X output is:

Sending Access-Accept of id 132 to 158.64.X.Y port 10270
Finished request 328
Going to the next request
Cleaning up request 315 ID 35 with timestamp 442404d4
Waking up in 1 seconds...
Waking up in 1 seconds...
Reloading configuration files.
reread_config:  reading radiusd.conf
Config:   including file: /etc/raddb/proxy.conf
Config:   including file: /etc/raddb/clients.conf
Config:   including file: /etc/raddb/eap.conf
Config:   including file: /etc/raddb/sql-normal-vpn.conf
Config:   including file: /etc/raddb/sql-normal-eduroam.conf
Config:   including file: /etc/raddb/sql-luxdsl-cops.conf
Config:   including file: /etc/raddb/sql-luxdsl-erx.conf
 main: prefix = /usr/local/freeradius
 main: localstatedir = /var
 main: logdir = /var/log/radius
 main: libdir = /usr/local/freeradius/lib
 main: radacctdir = /var/log/radius/radacct
 main: hostname_lookups = no
 main: max_request_time = 30
 main: cleanup_delay = 5
 main: max_requests = 1024
 main: delete_blocked_requests = 0
 main: port = 0
 main: allow_core_dumps = no
 main: log_stripped_names = no
 main: log_file = /var/log/radius/radius.log
 main: log_auth = yes
 main: log_auth_badpass = no
 main: log_auth_goodpass = no
 main: pidfile = /var/run/radiusd/radiusd.pid
 main: user = radiusd
 main: group = radiusd
 main: usercollide = no
 main: lower_user = no
 main: lower_pass = no
 main: nospace_user = no
 main: nospace_pass = no
 main: checkrad = /usr/local/freeradius/sbin/checkrad
 main: proxy_requests = yes
 security: max_attributes = 200
 security: reject_delay = 1
 security: status_server = no
 main: debug_level = 0
read_config_files:  reading dictionary
read_config_files:  reading naslist
Using deprecated naslist file.  Support for this will go away soon.
read_config_files:  reading clients
read_config_files:  reading realms
Segmentation fault

HTH,

Stefan Winter

-- 
Stefan WINTER

RESTENA Foundation - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de 
la Recherche
RD Engineer

6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     Tel.:     +352 424409-1
http://www.restena.lu               Fax:      +352 422473

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-24 Thread King, Michael
Mine seg faulted as well..

(This time I didn't overwrite the log)


rad2:/home/mking# /usr/sbin/freeradius -X -A crash.log
Segmentation fault
rad2:/home/mking# 


I don't believe running /usr/sbin/freeradius -X -A is capturing anything
useful.  Is there something else I can do?

Here's the last few lines of the freeradius -X -A


rlm_detail:
/var/log/freeradius/radacct/%{Client-IP-Address}/auth-detail-%Y%m%d
expands to /var/log/freeradius/radacct/10.0.1.32/auth-detail-20060324
  modcall[authorize]: module auth_log returns ok for request 1002
  modcall[authorize]: module chap returns noop for request 1002
  modcall[authorize]: module mschap returns noop for request 1002
rlm_realm: No '@' in User-Name = BSC\ddelutis, looking up realm
NULL
rlm_realm: No such realm NULL
  modcall[authorize]: module suffix returns noop for request 1002
  rlm_eap: EAP packet type response id 28 length 80
  rlm_eap: No EAP Start, assuming it's an on-going EAP conversation
  modcall[authorize]: module eap returns updated for request 1002
users: Matched entry DEFAULT at line 152
users: Matched entry DEFAULT at line 171
  modcall[authorize]: module files returns ok for request 1002
modcall: leaving group authorize (returns updated) for request 1002
  rad_check_password:  Found Auth-Type EAP
auth: type EAP
  Processing the authenticate section of radiusd.conf
modcall: entering group authenticate for request 1002
  rlm_eap: Request found, released from the list
  rlm_eap: EAP/peap
  rlm_eap: processing type peap
  rlm_eap_peap: Authenticate
  rlm_eap_tls: processing TLS
rlm_eap_tls:  Length Included
  eaptls_verify returned 11 

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-23 Thread King, Michael
So I built 1.1.1 on Debian.

After a period of so many hours (variable) it stops responding.
(Sometimes 2hours, sometimes 16hours)

Now here's where it get's weird, (and makes me suspect it might not be
freeRADIUS at the root cause)


If I stop and restart the freeRADIUS service, it continues to ignore
RADIUS packets.

But if I restart the server (hard reboot) it works fine.  Till it stops
responding again.

Obviously this is not enough information to help you diagnose the
problem.  How do I gather that information?

The box is a 233 Pentium with 64 megs of ram.  Has about 15 AP's, with
around 100 users (not simultaneous, maybe 30 simultaneous)

So what's the suggested way of gathering more info?  Running debug mode
piping to a text file?

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-23 Thread Ben Thompson
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 09:24 -0500, King, Michael wrote:
 So I built 1.1.1 on Debian.
 
 After a period of so many hours (variable) it stops responding.
 (Sometimes 2hours, sometimes 16hours)
 
 Now here's where it get's weird, (and makes me suspect it might not be
 freeRADIUS at the root cause)
 
 
 If I stop and restart the freeRADIUS service, it continues to ignore
 RADIUS packets.

I am seeing a similar problem on RedHat. I originally thought it was
only happening when I sent a HUP signal, but it turns out this is not
the case. 

However in my case all I have to do to fix it is restart the service (I
do not need to reboot the entire operating system). 


Ben

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Version 1.1.1 stops responding

2006-03-23 Thread Stefan Winter
Hi,

 I am seeing a similar problem on RedHat. I originally thought it was
 only happening when I sent a HUP signal, but it turns out this is not
 the case.

 However in my case all I have to do to fix it is restart the service (I
 do not need to reboot the entire operating system).

for the record: this happened to me *once* as well (SuSE 8.2). That coincided 
with an access point crashing in the middle of an authentication, so I 
thought it might just be that the AP sent a very weird packet while dieing.

Really strange symptoms... radiusd and all its threads are running, and bound 
to the port they should, but no indication of a received packet. Re-starting 
the service did the trick for me as well.

Greetings,

Stefan Winter

-- 
Stefan WINTER

Stiftung RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de 
la Recherche
Ingenieur Forschung  Entwicklung

6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     Tel.:     +352 424409-1
http://www.restena.lu                Fax:      +352 422473

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html