Re: Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-19 Thread Alan DeKok
Jacob Jarick wrote: The deps have incorrect names, ie requests apache2-devel but fedora calls it httpd2-devel and so on. The Redhat freeradius.spec file distributed with FreeRADIUS doesn't reference apache2-devel. If you're using the Redhat spec file, please ask them about fixing it. * The

Re: Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-19 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, The deps have incorrect names, ie requests apache2-devel but fedora calls it httpd2-devel and so on. argh!!! now it all makes sense. from your previous email you said cp freeradius-1.1.6/suse/freeradius.spec /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ why the ** would you be trying to use a SUSE

Re: Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-19 Thread Jacob Jarick
hahaha sorry alan. Big mistake of mine, I am dsylexic and yer well there u go. I was reading suse as fedors (dont ask why). Sorry for the false alarm, I did check and double check but sometimes I never see the words right once I have mis-read them until some1 else points it out. So I should be

Re: Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-19 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, So I should be using the redhat spec file for fedora correct ? - will correct. SUSE is a very different beast to RedHat - as you have discovered alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-19 Thread Jacob Jarick
Here is my updated Install (now the same as the wikis) and yes works the way I expected. Swapping to 1.1.6 now, then back to figuring out LDAP :) # cd /usr/src # tar zxvf /root/Desktop/freeradius-1.1.6.tar.gz # cp /root/Desktop/freeradius-1.1.6.tar.gz /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ # cp

Re: Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-19 Thread Peter Nixon
On Thu 19 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, So I should be using the redhat spec file for fedora correct ? - will correct. SUSE is a very different beast to RedHat - as you have discovered Erm.. Having said that, the SUSE spec file should and DOES build on Fedora as well. I have gone

Re: Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-19 Thread Jacob Jarick
Unless I did something wrong mate it def doesnt build (dependancies have diff names). On the topic though. 1.1.6 built fine from the redhat spec file, I am going to trial it once Im done with testing this ldap search problem. On 4/19/07, Peter Nixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu 19 Apr 2007,

Re: Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-19 Thread Peter Nixon
On Thu 19 Apr 2007, Jacob Jarick wrote: Unless I did something wrong mate it def doesnt build (dependancies have diff names). Well, sorry. to be more clear, the latest version of the spec file which is used to build the rpms in opensuse does. I may have forgotten to commit this back to cvs.

Fedora 1.1.6 rpm build BROKEN

2007-04-18 Thread Jacob Jarick
The deps have incorrect names, ie requests apache2-devel but fedora calls it httpd2-devel and so on. So atm, rpm building completely broken, any comments / suggestions are welcome. I will be going back to compiling from source until the bins are resolved. I suppose I could use some random rpm