Re: Version 2 running on Red Hat 5
Hi, > All, > > > > Is someone being able to run version 2 on Red Hat 5.x? yes - what is your problem with it? alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: Version 2 running on Red Hat 5
Dubreuil, Gilles wrote: All, Is someone being able to run version 2 on Red Hat 5.x? Yes - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: Version 2 bzip file is gzip
John Horne wrote: > It seems that the bzip2 file of the new version 2.0.0 is actually a gzip > file: Fixed, thanks. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re : version 2; I cant wait
Alan, great, I cant wait for the magic ..:-). == Benjamin K. Eshun - Message d'origine De : Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : FreeRadius users mailing list Envoyé le : Samedi, 17 Mars 2007, 17h46mn 18s Objet : Re: version 2 Norbert Wegener wrote: > On http://wiki.freeradius.org/Fail-over > I find an interesting feature, that would be very useful in some > configurations: ... > As mentioned there, it is available in version 2 of the server. > Is it already foreseeable, when approximately the version 2 of > freeradius will be available? Soon. I know I've been saying that for a while (too long now), but it looks pretty good. I have some code that has cleaned up a lot of the odd things in the server core, so I'm much more comfortable releasing a 2.0. So far, the features look like: - if/then/else in radiusd.conf - full IPv6 support - much more stable handling of home servers - separation of realms from home servers - addition of "home server pools", for failover & load balancing - magic feature 1 - magic feature 2 - :) I won't say what the magic features are. One will cause mild surprise. The other will cause great surprise. My plan right now is to test the code privately with a few early adopters who are sworn to secrecy. Once it looks like it works, the code will be made public, and a 2.0-pre0 will be announced. From my research on Google, the features will quadruple FreeRADIUS's potential install base. The features will also enable network administrators to do things that are currently impossible to do with open source software. And it looks like it's only 3k-4k lines of code. :) Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html ___ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: version 2
Tease!! ;) -Original Message- From: Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:46:18 To:FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: version 2 Norbert Wegener wrote: > On http://wiki.freeradius.org/Fail-over > I find an interesting feature, that would be very useful in some > configurations: ... > As mentioned there, it is available in version 2 of the server. > Is it already foreseeable, when approximately the version 2 of > freeradius will be available? Soon. I know I've been saying that for a while (too long now), but it looks pretty good. I have some code that has cleaned up a lot of the odd things in the server core, so I'm much more comfortable releasing a 2.0. So far, the features look like: - if/then/else in radiusd.conf - full IPv6 support - much more stable handling of home servers - separation of realms from home servers - addition of "home server pools", for failover & load balancing - magic feature 1 - magic feature 2 - :) I won't say what the magic features are. One will cause mild surprise. The other will cause great surprise. My plan right now is to test the code privately with a few early adopters who are sworn to secrecy. Once it looks like it works, the code will be made public, and a 2.0-pre0 will be announced. From my research on Google, the features will quadruple FreeRADIUS's potential install base. The features will also enable network administrators to do things that are currently impossible to do with open source software. And it looks like it's only 3k-4k lines of code. :) Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Re: version 2
Norbert Wegener wrote: > On http://wiki.freeradius.org/Fail-over > I find an interesting feature, that would be very useful in some > configurations: ... > As mentioned there, it is available in version 2 of the server. > Is it already foreseeable, when approximately the version 2 of > freeradius will be available? Soon. I know I've been saying that for a while (too long now), but it looks pretty good. I have some code that has cleaned up a lot of the odd things in the server core, so I'm much more comfortable releasing a 2.0. So far, the features look like: - if/then/else in radiusd.conf - full IPv6 support - much more stable handling of home servers - separation of realms from home servers - addition of "home server pools", for failover & load balancing - magic feature 1 - magic feature 2 - :) I won't say what the magic features are. One will cause mild surprise. The other will cause great surprise. My plan right now is to test the code privately with a few early adopters who are sworn to secrecy. Once it looks like it works, the code will be made public, and a 2.0-pre0 will be announced. From my research on Google, the features will quadruple FreeRADIUS's potential install base. The features will also enable network administrators to do things that are currently impossible to do with open source software. And it looks like it's only 3k-4k lines of code. :) Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
