Hi Marc-André,
>Having experience with JNI bindings for Java, I can say making Java
>bindings to the FreeRDP libraries would require quite a lot more work.
>Pinvoke does not require having "glue layer" code on the native side, even
>though it can be used. JNI bindings, on the other hand, definitely
Alex,
You have to evaluate requirements with regards to their possible value.
Yes, having a no-installation client is definitely of great value, but if
it means implementing an RDP client fully in Java or C# without reusing any
of the existing native code I think it's definitely not worth it. The
Hi,
Given your requirements of not having to install anything, there's really
not many options available. The only true way of getting a "no installation
RDP client" is to have it all run within the web browser, not requiring any
plugins. This is what FreeRDP-WebConnect does. If it doesn't work on
Bligh wrote:
From: Alex Bligh
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Java client
To: "Huihong Luo" , freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: "Alex Bligh"
Date: Wednesday, September 5, 2012, 3:14 PM
--On 5 September 2012 15:02:26 -0700 Huihong Luo wrote:
> A pure java client w
;
> Is it pure C#? or contains native DLLs that C# calls into?
>
> Do you use lots of DllImport in C# code? If not, translate C# to java
> should be very straight forward.
>
> - huihong
>
> --- On *Wed, 9/5/12, Marc-André Moreau *wrote:
>
>
> From: Marc-André M
--On 5 September 2012 15:02:26 -0700 Huihong Luo wrote:
> A pure java client with same features as FreeRDP will be a huge
> undertaking, any particular reason why a java client is needed? FreeRDP
> uses ARM NEON or Intel MMX optimizations for performance, all of these
> will be lost with pure j
oreau
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Java client
To: "Huihong Luo"
Cc: freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Alex Bligh"
Date: Wednesday, September 5, 2012, 3:08 PM
Hi,
Is Java a hard requirement? I have C# bindings written for a large portion of
FreeRDP, you can definitely u
st with pure java client, besides the efforts. Since each major
> platforms will have a native client, I don't see obvious reason for a java
> client.
> a C# client might make more sense, since Windows Mobile requires that.
>
> --- On Tue, 9/4/12, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> From:
have a native
client, I don't see obvious reason for a java client.
a C# client might make more sense, since Windows Mobile requires that.
--- On Tue, 9/4/12, Alex Bligh wrote:
From: Alex Bligh
Subject: [Freerdp-devel] Java client
To: freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tu
We are using freerdp to connect to Windows Server 2012 servers and it works
great.
We would like to produce a similarly up to date Java RDP client, and open
source it, ideally as part of the freerdp project, but otherwise as a
separate project. We believe there are no open source Java RDP clients
10 matches
Mail list logo
