External Email - Use Caution
Dear FS experts,
From a pre- data set, is it possible to extract thickness
values at those two time points just by using recon-all, that is, without
running the full longitudinal processing stream (the Cross, Base and Long
steps)?
I aim not so much
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 16:42, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> Hi Tudor
>
> sorry, I don't think there is a direct correspondence. Is the Oxford
> atlas even on the surface?
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Tudor Popescu wrote:
>
> >
> > External Emai
External Email - Use Caution
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I have a network of interest described in terms of regions from the
Harvard-Oxford atlas. I would next need to describe this network in terms
of regions from the DKT (Desikan–Killiany–Tourville) atlas.
I have not found hints
to be a bug in FS v5.3.0 (which is sadly the only
version available to run on Windows, using a Linux Virtual Machine).
Cheers,
Tudor
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 at 18:00, Tudor Popescu wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> At a loss for more things to try here, I tried the following: for the
> first s
External Email - Use Caution
Dear FS list,
( Apologies for asking my question again which I am still struggling to
resolve and which I tried to clarify and condense below. )
I have pre and post-intervention data for a single group of subjects, and
I'd like to extract the
ideas of what I could try, I'd remain really indebted!
Cheers,
Tudor
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 16:03, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> Hi Tudor
>
> I think Martin is probably better able to sort this out than I am.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Tudor Popescu wrote:
>
> >
-all -autorecon1 -autorecon2 -subjid 01_1
returns
mri_em_register: could not open input volume nu.mgz
Not sure what to do at this stage!.. Thanks again for any pointers!
Cheers,
Tudor
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 at 18:16, Tudor Popescu wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thanks for your answer! Befo
o all have exactly the same geometries and rerun (I think
> mri_convert -rl
>
> should do it (-rl is "reslice like"). If they are not trivial though you
> may find effects that only reflect the acquisition differences.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, T
External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
If any more information is needed to address my question, please do let me
know. I hope to hear back and once again thanks a lot for any assistance
with this.
Best wishes,
Tudor
On 1 June 2018 at 16:07, Tudor Popescu wrote:
> Dear
External Email - Use Caution
Dear all,
I have pre and post-intervention data for a single group of subjects, and
I'd like to extract the cortical thickness pre and post, for all standard
regions in the atlas, and use those in subsequent analyses.
Following the standard approach
the ribbon
doug
On 10/02/2014 08:48 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Dear FS list,
I have significant clusters from several QDEC analyses (each one for a
different DV i.e. thickness, area, etc). I would like to generate a
picture of a standard brain (talairach or MNI) with several
Dear FS list,
I have significant clusters from several QDEC analyses (each one for a
different DV i.e. thickness, area, etc). I would like to generate a
picture of a standard brain (talairach or MNI) with several of these
clusters superimposed on the same brain, to show where there are e.g.
Dear FS list (dear Martin),
I have a 3 groups x 2 timepoints data set, and I did analyses in QDEC
comparing my groups pairwise (2 at a time) in terms of the pre-to-post
percentage change (pc1) in various surface-based metrics like thickness and
area.
Since a group contrast is a bit difficult for
Dear FS team,
I have structural data from a training study involving different tDCS
groups. I would like to define ROIs (masks) in MNI space corresponding to
the approximate cortical area underlying the tDCS electrodes, which were
placed on F3F4 for one group and on P3P4 in another group (10-20
Dear FS list, (dear Martin!)
I have a longitudinal design, 3 groups, 2 timepoints, and I created three
different QDEC tables (two groups at a time) in order to be able to compare
each pair of groups in terms of percentage change from pre to post (what's
referred to as pc1 in the first stage of
?
Doesn't variability across all 3 groups somehow have to be accounted for?
Tudor
On 16 June 2014 20:38, Douglas Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Yes, you could do each separately.
doug
On 6/16/14 8:10 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Dear FS list,
I have a data set with 3 groups (2
Dear FS list,
I have a data set with 3 groups (2 treatments, 1 control), each with
equally-spaced time-points (pre and post structural scan). I've done the 3
longitudinal pre-processing steps, and stage#1 of the two-stage model, and
I would prefer to run stage#2 (cross-sectional analysis of the
across all 3 groups somehow have to be accounted for?
Tudor
On 16 June 2014 20:38, Douglas Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Yes, you could do each separately.
doug
On 6/16/14 8:10 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Dear FS list,
I have a data set with 3 groups (2 treatments, 1 control
Dear FS list,
I did all 3 steps of the longitudinal stream (cross, base, long), plus the
long_mris_slopes for my three-group two-timepoint data set. This gave me
files for thickness and area, but I'd also like to do analysis for lGI. To
that end, I first did
recon-all -s subj -localGI
and
everything is generated new).
Best, Martin
On Jun 2, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce
I suspected this might be the case, since assessing 3D surfaces from a
succession of 2D slices can be tricky, which is why I was wondering whether
there's a better way to do
Hi Martin,
Wasn't sure whether you'd seen my reply below, look forward to hear back
your thoughts, thanks!
Tudor
On 25 May 2014 21:40, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks very much Martin and Bruce. I guess I'd misread the Wiki (my own
fault, not the text's), and am glad to hear
the longitudinal tutorial
http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsTutorial/LongitudinalTutorial
3. At the recon all level in FS you get (after the 3 steps) measurement
for all time points. So you would compare those results across time in the
stats.
Hope that helps, Martin
On 05/08/2014 08:14 AM, Tudor Popescu
Hi all,
If I understand correctly, the surface-based morphometry (SBM) done by
Freesurfer offers superior registration as compared to voxel-based methods
such as VBM, in that:
1. SBM smoothing respects anatomical boundaries better than the 3D VBM
smoothing.
2. SBM group analysis employs
), but part is that we register based on
cortical folding patterns not image intensities, so folds are much more
likely to align across subjects (and architectonic areas as well)
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hi all,
If I understand correctly, the surface-based
Sorry for the repeat, wasn't sure whether this was received the first time.
Tudor
On 6 May 2014 19:55, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear FS list,
I have structural data from a learning study (prepost-training scans,
with 3 groups). Although the training was only one week, I'm
Dear FS list,
I have structural data from a learning study (prepost-training scans, with
3 groups). Although the training was only one week, I'm guessing from an
analysis point of view, this still qualifies as longitudinal. I want to
check for
- the main within-subjects effect of time point
on and what version of FS?
doug
On 04/02/2014 06:34 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hi Doug
Sorry, again I wasn't sure whether you'd noticed my reply amonst the
latest list messages. Hopefully there is a fix for this error.
Thanks
Tudor
On 2 April 2014 12:33, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com
Your mri_glmfit-sim command line is not correct and does not match
examples in the help. Basically you need to spec --cache 1.3 abs
not --cache 1.3 --sim-sign abs
Thanks Doug, now it worked, however I'm getting this error, which several
other people seem to get: Computing
Dear Freesurfer experts,
After a qdec contrast that asked where does thickness correlate with
behavioural score, I got 2 significant clusters, and I would like, for each
of these clusters, to have a list of extracted average thickness values
(across the entire cluster), for each subject that I
doug
On 03/31/2014 11:28 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Dear Freesurfer experts,
After a qdec contrast that asked where does thickness correlate with
behavioural score, I got 2 significant clusters, and I would like, for
each of these clusters, to have a list of extracted average thickness
to extract values from the two
clusters?
On 31 March 2014 18:35, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
The file you are looking for should be something like
mc-z.abs.th13.y.ocn.dat
you dont need to run mri_glmfit-sim again
On 03/31/2014 12:25 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Thanks Doug
5.3.0
On 31 March 2014 19:07, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
what version of FS are you running
On 03/31/2014 12:48 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hi Doug
The only OCN files I have in my qdec correlation contrast folder
(after having run the MC-Z correction) are mc
correction for multiple comparisons?
Either from qdec or with mri_glmfit-sim? That y.ocn file should be there
On 03/31/2014 02:02 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
5.3.0
On 31 March 2014 19:07, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
what version of FS
Hi Doug,
3) In a group X gender X age DODS design, exactly which contrast
(interaction) has to be examined in order to see if the analysis
proceeds as DODS or as DOSS? And what would the course of action be
assuming there are significant clusters for that contrast?
group X gender X age,
there
are significant clusters for that contrast?
Many thanks!
Tudor
On 8 March 2014 10:03, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Doug. I wasn't clear in my DOSS question, I meant to ask why
are categoricalXcontinuous interactions (e.g. such as the one probed
by the contrast Does the thickness
Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
On 03/06/2014 10:35 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Sorry, couple more questions:
1) I know that QDEC's/mri_glmfit's equivalent in FSL (randomise)
applies the GLM by doing permutations, and so
16:53, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
On 03/06/2014 10:35 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Sorry, couple more questions:
1) I know that QDEC's/mri_glmfit's equivalent in FSL (randomise)
applies the GLM by doing permutations, and so already corrects for
multiple comparisons
Hello, I have some questions on doing group comparisons with thickness,
area and volume. Many thanks in advance for any help!
1) For a DOSS design with group and gender as categorical factors, I see
that an interaction contrast (Is there a group-gender interaction in the
mean thickness?) still
/2014 01:55 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I ran a QDEC analysis for structural data and found, after Monte-Carlo
correction@0.05, one significant cluster, annotated as postcentral
(see screenshot attached). The stats associated with it are displayed
in the terminal
It does indeed, thanks Doug
T
On 4 February 2014 18:19, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
The value displayed is actually sign(effect)*log10(p), which I think
answers both of your questions
doug
On 02/04/2014 01:00 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Thanks Doug. I only now gather
the visualisation threshold (you have min = 2), whereas you run your Monte
Carlo with a threshold of 0.05 (i.e. 1.3), and your cluster seem to be just
in between.
Hope it helps,
Marie
On Feb 2, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I ran a QDEC analysis
Hi everyone and happy new year!
I made a couple of manual edits to a wm.mgz file and then relaunched part
of that subject's recon (-autorecon2-wm -autorecon3). After it finished,
however, the wm.mgz had lost its manual edits - even though I had saved the
edited version under the same name, in the
Hi Bruce
Yes I am - sorry to not have mentioned
Tudor
On 5 January 2014 17:00, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Tudor
Are you doing the editing with tkmedit?
Cheers
Bruce
On Jan 5, 2014, at 6:20 AM, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone and happy new year
. The questions
should be visible in plaintext below, please let me know if I should upload
the files on a sharing server
Thanks!
Tudor
On 15 July 2013 19:51, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
I was wondering whether my previous message was received, since it had
rather large attachments
Hi again,
I was wondering whether my previous message was received, since it had
rather large attachments. I look forward to receiving a reply with regards
to my questions!
Thank you,
Tudor
On 12 July 2013 16:03, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Bruce. So the massive chunks
, then 001 and raw are the same
orig.mgz is the first conformed volume
doug
On 07/08/2013 12:38 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Thanks Bruce. I have looked at that part of the wiki but I was
wondering whether the screenshots at all suggest that all artefacts
are likely to be the result of the same
Dear FSers,
Still haven't got to the bottom of this, any suggestions would be much
appreciated, thanks in advance!
Tudor
On 5 July 2013 17:26, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
The skull-stripping step of recon-all must have gone bad for my sample,
because I noticed
Thanks Bruce. I have looked at that part of the wiki but I was wondering
whether the screenshots at all suggest that all artefacts are likely to be
the result of the same problem, and that e.g. re-running recon for all
subjects with a watershed25 and with the -no-wsgcaatlas flag might be the
thing
… but same thing, it will need the getmatlab command to point to the
correct location.
Hope you will find a way, sorry to be not more helpful,
Marie
On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com
wrote:
Many thanks for your reply Marie.
getmatlab returns ERROR: Cannot
Dear Freesurfer localGI experts,
I want to compare local GI (gyrification index) between my two groups.
Following the help https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LGI, I ran
this command for one of my subjects:
recon-all -s M01 -localGI
but it resulted in the error:
that will be a
problem at some point if not now. I would have thought that it would have
reported that it could not find matalb. Marie would know for sure.
doug
On 6/14/13 3:25 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Dear Freesurfer localGI experts,
I want to compare local GI (gyrification index) between
Hi all,
The command:
recon-all -s M19 -localGI
resulted in:
make_outer_surface('/media/math/all38subj/M19/surf/tmp-mris_compute_lgi-lh.pial/lh.pial.filled.mgz',15,'/media/math/all38subj/M19/surf/tmp-mris_compute_lgi-lh.pial/lh.pial-outer');
exit
=
ERROR:: Too many arguments.
I
PS: Which files/folders will I need to delete after I'll have fixed the
problem, before re-running the recon? Or will it just overwrite any
left-overs?
On 13 June 2013 10:32, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The command:
recon-all -s M19 -localGI
resulted
Under fsaverage/surf there is both an lh.white and an lh.white_avg file,
while under average/surf there's only lh.white_avg. I repeated the
mri_surf2surf command above with --s fsaverage instead of --s average
(since I understand in this case it's the same thing), and then it ran to
Thanks Doug,
So if I want to use the study-specific average subject surface with
mri_surf2surf, rather than the generic fsaverage one, how can this be
done given that the required ls.white file only exists in the latter but
not in the former? Can I just rename (or duplicate) ls.white into
C) When running mri_surf2surf, I get an error saying that file
/surf/lh.white cannot be opened. The 'average' folder produced
after I ran make_average_subject does not contain a
/surf/lh.white file, only a /surf/lh.white_avg file! I didn’t
find a log
should see something
like this:
MRISfdr2vwth(): np = 163842, nv = 163842, fdr = 0.2, vwth=4.60487
Found 0 of 163842 vertices above FDR threshold (of 4.60487)
On 05/23/2013 03:13 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Just reporting a GUI bug in QDEC: after setting a different FDR
threshold and pressing
Just reporting a GUI bug in QDEC: after setting a different FDR threshold
and pressing the Set Using FDR button, more often than not the results
image doesn’t change accordingly. I noticed that the button only has an
effect after moving around the QDEC window and/or waiting a minute or so.
Hope
Hello,
I was wondering whether someone could please explain exactly how values are
assigned to each column of the design matrix, when a C.dat contrast vector
(e.g. [0, 0, 1, -1]) is created, in the correlation as opposed to in the
intercept types of contrasts ...
I am asking this because I have
1) In a design with group and gender as discrete factors and age
as a continuous factor, why is it that QDEC only displays the
contrast Does the avg thickness, accounting for gender, differ
between group1 and group2? and not also ..acounting for gender
Not sure whether anyone'd seen my last email (below). Again apologies for
the multitude of questions, I hope this is the last batch for this
analysis..
On 12 May 2013 16:45, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I very much appreciate your help with an additional set
1) In a design with group and gender as discrete factors and age
as a continuous factor, why is it that QDEC only displays the
contrast Does the avg thickness, accounting for gender, differ
between group1 and group2? and not also ..acounting for gender
and age,..?
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I very much appreciate your help with an additional set of questions. I
feel I'm really close to getting this finished :)
1) In a design with group and gender as discrete factors and age as a
continuous factor, why is it that QDEC only displays the contrast Does the
avg
Hi everyone, I resort to asking some questions here again, after feeling
increasingly stupid (maybe just tired) after reading the wiki pages
relevant for my analysis (ROI, thickness).
1) How should the contrast vector for a group comparison while factoring
out age and gender be built? I didn't
Hello all,
I have some more burning questions, for which I thank you in advance!!
1) I expected that mri_annotation2label --subject 01 --hemi lh --outdir
$SUBJECTS_DIR/myLabels would give me labels corresponding to structures of
the standard FreeSurfer atlas (Destrieux), instead it produced
pressing some buttons, and some menu options, with no luck)
On 8 May 2013 16:54, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
On 05/08/2013 11:43 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hello all,
I have some more burning questions, for which I thank you in advance!!
1) I expected
structure is identified in
its own colour, and these colours fill up the entire brain (there's no grey
surface left)
On 8 May 2013 16:54, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
On 05/08/2013 11:43 AM, Tudor Popescu
Thanks Doug! If I may follow up:
3) (I can't see whether there's a tutorial for this, as the main FS
site seems to be down at the moment) How can a group comparison of CT
be done inside a given ROI, and in what ways can the ROI be specified?
I guess the command line version of QDEC would
Dear Freesurfers,
I am doing an ROI analysis (group comparison) of cortical thickness, and I
have some questions that I could use some help with. Many thanks in advance!
Tudor
1) I used aparcstats2table to extract CT values for structures from the
Destrieux atlas, but I cannot identify some
Apologies for my previous long email; if anyone gets a chance to look over
the questions I'd be really grateful!
Many thanks indeed,
Tudor
On 16 April 2013 19:40, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Nick, (and thanks Doug too for the answer to question 2.)
It must indeed have been
, 2013-04-15 at 18:38 +0200, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Dear experts,
Upgrading to 5.2.0 stopped QDEC (specifically, mri_concat) from
misbehaving, and so after running a first whole-brain group cortical
thickness analysis on my structural data, I have some questions:
1. After running recon-all
Hi Zeke, was wondering if you saw my message. VirtualBox only seems to
accept VDI files, so it seems I cannot make use of the new 5.2 version,
which is downloadable only as a .TAR.GZ
Sorry this is proving so difficult..
T
On 1 April 2013 15:29, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Zeke
that the
analysis is just an AN(C)OVA, so I still don't understand how questions
such as the one about the correlation being non-zero can be answered..
Thanks again very much Doug!!
On 28 March 2013 20:07, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
On 03/28/2013 03:53 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote
Still stuck with this error in my QDEC analysis attempt, at my wit's end,
could anyone help please? Thanks!
Tudor
On 26 March 2013 20:35, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Just giving this thread a new bump, as *again *I am receiving this error
from mri_concat, upon pressing the Analyze
I was wondering if anybody is able to help with (any one of) these
questions? That would be really helpful, as I could not find an answer on
the wiki.
Many thanks in advance!
On 26 March 2013 20:44, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
My QDEC analysis ran into an error
Hi everyone,
My QDEC analysis ran into an error message that seems to be a classic
(and, so far, it seems unsolved), from mri_concat, which I've described in
a separate message, just sent.
I have, however, more theoretical questions about QDEC, which I hope some
kind soul will help me with:
-
Berger
n0642...@students.meduniwien.ac.atwrote:
On Friday, February 01, 2013 17:12:00 Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hi Doug
Strangely, the basic mri_concat command now worked, and so did the full
one. I think I initially had a \ at the end of my command, just after
the
file name, which should
Thanks Nick and Anil! I tried with the Bert data set in its original
location, and got a different kind of error:
ERROR: talairach_afd::Load_xfm(): could not parse transforms/talairach.xfm
Manual Talairach alignment may be necessary, or
include the -notal-check flag to skip this test,
making sure
memory under the
'free'
column. confirm that 'recon-all -s bert -all' runs successfully for
you
prior to running unknown/new data.
Nick
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 19:01 +, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your help, I'm on Windows XP SP3 VirtualBox 4.2.4
(Virtualbox's shared folder).
Anyhow, thanks again for your kind help!
Tudor
On 31 January 2013 20:36, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
On 01/31/2013 12:30 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hi Doug,
I'm not sure why that does not make sense, shouldn't the input of
mri_concat be several
!
Tudor
On 20 December 2012 05:24, Douglas Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
That does not make sense. Try using only one input file. Also, put --debug
as the first option.
doug
On 12/19/12 8:32 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hi Doug,
So the full command is
mri_concat
/media/Dell
to solve this problem. Maybe Nick knows.
doug
On 12/19/12 6:59 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Hi Doug, thanks for replying, here is the file attached. In case the
attachment doesn't go through please let me know if I should send it to a
different address.
Tudor
On 18 December 2012 17:34, Douglas N
VirtualBox version you are
running this on? I'm at a loss as to why this build no longer works.
Nick
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 18:19 +, Tudor Popescu wrote:
Dear Nick,
I was wondering whether you (or indeed anyone else reading this!) know
where the error that I report earlier in this thread
Dear all,
I have some questions I could not find an answer to myself, I'd really
appreciate it if anyone could help out.
1) How should recon-all be used to process all subjects' data (i.e. obtain
the surface for each subject) before taking it to QDEC (or command prompt)
for a group thickness
Hello everyone,
I tried doing the QDEC group analysis tutorial, however after doing
everything as instructed in the tutorial, when pressing Analyze I get the
error message:
*Error in Analyze: command failed: mri_concat
Hello everyone,
I'm following the group analysis tutorial, but have difficulty getting all
files in the right folders. I have my tutorial data set in *
/media/Dell/_FS/buckner_data/* (a folder that is shared in my VirtualBox),
and my original subjects folder in the default path of *
experienced with Freeview, but did you try typing freeview
in the command line and using the File-Load Volume… from the GUI?
If that doesn't work maybe you can give me the exact command you used.
Hope I could help.
Regards,
Yaniv
On 06/12/2012, at 1:47 AM, Tudor Popescu tud...@gmail.com wrote
Hi everyone,
I tried opening a NIFTI (.nii.gz) image in freeview, but it gives me
repeated Failed to load image name errors.
That same image loads fine in FSLview, but even when trying with other
NIFTI images, I get the same error.
The default image
88 matches
Mail list logo
