Hi all,
Does anyone have experience running a longitudinal analysis in version 5.0,
using .mgz files generated from the last version of freesurfer? My
understanding is that the only major differences between the previous and
current versions were in the longitudinal stream. Any input would be
no, there are other differences as well.
Bruce
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Erica Griffith
wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone have experience running a longitudinal analysis in version 5.0,
using .mgz files generated from the last version of freesurfer? My
understanding is that the only major differences
Alright, thanks. Would you recommend against using the new longitudinal
stream with data generated from a previous version though? That is my main
question.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:
no, there are other differences as well.
Bruce
On Tue,
Hi Erica,
I'm not sure what you mean. Why not just run it through all the way? And
we would *strongly* recommend using the 5.1 longitudinal instead of 5.0
cheers
Bruce
On
Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Erica Griffith wrote:
Alright, thanks. Would you recommend against using the new longitudinal
stream
Hi Bruce,
We are working with a cohort of several hundred subjects, and all of the
data has already been processed using the last version of FS. It would take
quite a while for us to go through all of that data again, so we're trying
to figure out if it would be okay to go ahead and use the
its ok to use just the longitudinal stream of 5.1 with your existing data.
that is, you dont need to rerun the cross-sectional part of the
three-stage longitudinal process, just -base stage and then the -long
stage.
n.
Hi Bruce,
We are working with a cohort of several hundred subjects, and
