...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*On Behalf Of *Ruopeng Wang
*Sent:* Monday, September 16, 2019 1:17 PM
*To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] 001 vs brainmask views in freeview
The first volume is always displayed in its original orientation where
pixel data are stored. So
<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
On Behalf Of Ruopeng Wang
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 11:51 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] 001 vs brainmask
Of *Ruopeng Wang
*Sent:* Monday, September 16, 2019 11:51 AM
*To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] 001 vs brainmask views in freeview
Hi,
When you load brainmask.mgz as the second volume, it will be realigned
to 001.mgz. The default resample method is nearest-neighbor. Thus you
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
On Behalf Of Ruopeng Wang
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 11:51 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] 001 vs brainmask views in freeview
Hi,
When you load brainmask.mgz as the second volume, it will be realigned to
001.mgz. The default resample method
Hi,
When you load brainmask.mgz as the second volume, it will be realigned
to 001.mgz. The default resample method is nearest-neighbor. Thus you
get the blocky look. You can try loading it with trilinear or cubic
resampling like this from the command-line:
freeview -v 001.mgz brainmask.mgz
