the response is in the body f the mail
On 7/18/16 9:27 PM, Lee Subin Kristine wrote:
Hi Doug,
It seems that the email reply you just sent to me was empty. Could you
please check your email message again?
Thank you as always,
Subin
Hi Doug,
It seems that the email reply you just sent to me was empty. Could you please
check your email message again?
Thank you as always,
Subin
보낸 사람: Douglas N Greve 대신
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
What segmentation do you mean? Where are you getting vtk files? We write the
segmentation into .mgz volumes such as aseg.mgz
Cheers
Bruce
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Abbie McNulty wrote:
>
> So we were able to figure out how to segment the different parts of the
And I would say if you want to do T1w/T2w myelin mapping the T2w scan will
give you more contrast for that, as the fluid inversion does seem to
reduce your contrast for myelin some (though it may increase your contrast
for CSF). FLAIR can be useful for other things (like seeing some kinds of
Register the suvr to the anatomical (mri_coreg) then use mri_vol2vol
On 7/18/16 6:58 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
> Thank you Doug,
> Kindly how can I make the suvr and the anatomical images in the same slice?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
Hi Reema
you should visualize it over the norm.mgz. The brainmask and brain will
wash out many low contrast borders (e.g. thalamus, pallidum)
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 18 Jul
2016, Reema Jayakar wrote:
Hello FS Listserv members,
With regard to checking amygdala segmentation, is it appropriate
Hi Michelle
that's a tough question. We don't have a ton of experience with it one
way or the other, but if I had to pick one I would pick FLAIR as long as
you are getting a 3D FLAIR with around 1mm voxels
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016,
Michelle T Kassel wrote:
Hello,
I am
Thank you Doug,
I used the command fslswapdim
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Alshikho, Mohamad
J.
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:59 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re:
Thank you Doug,
Kindly how can I make the suvr and the anatomical images in the same slice?
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:56 PM
To:
Your suvr is axially sliced whereas the anatomical is corronally sliced.
They must be in exact pixel-for-pixel alignment for mri_segstats to work.
On 07/18/2016 06:27 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
> Thank you Doug!
>
> Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum
>
I sent the files (wmparc.mgz and the functional image)
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas N Greve
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:29 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re:
I'm at a loss as to why that is the case. Can you send the PET.anat.mgz
and wmparc.mgz to our filedrop?
On 07/18/2016 06:14 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
> Thank you Doug!
>
> Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum
> structures have zeros for the mean, SD ,
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum
structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles) Also if we
scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white and cortex)
are zeros.
I have this issue with 70 % of the
You have a rogue non-ascii character between HM-HR10-002Rest and Group1
(between others). Make sure you create your fsgd file in a simple ascii
text editor.
On 06/23/2016 01:48 AM, Jarek Rokicki wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> I am trying to perform the resting state fMRI analysis as in:
Thank you Doug!
Attached is a report for one of the subjects showing how the cerebellum
structures have zeros for the mean, SD , ...etc ( red circles)
Also if we scroll down ( not included), all the cerebellum parcellates ( white
and cortex) are zeros.
I have this issue with 70 % of the
Is this still a problem? If so, can you upload the dicom files to our
file drop?
On 07/05/2016 11:24 AM, Koubiyr, Ismail wrote:
> The file has not been anonymized.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ismail
>
>> On Jul 5, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Douglas N Greve
>> wrote:
>>
>> can you answer
It did, I removed 2 of them and it's running fine now. Thanks!
Matt
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Douglas N Greve
[gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:48 PM
To:
Check the contents of
/autofs/cluster/neuromind/dwakeman/tsc_pilot/subjects/nmr00978/subjectname
It may have the subjectname repeated 3 times
On 07/18/2016 05:45 PM, Hibert, Matthew Louis wrote:
> Attached. I took a quick look and it seems that I wrote the subject name 3
> times, on new
Attached. I took a quick look and it seems that I wrote the subject name 3
times, on new lines, to the subjectname file. I removed 2 of them and re-ran
selxavg3-sess and it appears to be working.
Thanks for the help Doug.
Matt
From:
The DeMeanFlag in what tool?
On 07/08/2016 05:16 AM, Clara Kühn wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> is there an explanation somewhere for the DeMeanFlag? I can't find it in the
> wiki but I would like to use it to demean my covariates for the GLM and LME.
>
> Cheers
> Clara
>
--
Douglas N.
What do you mean you got 0s only for the cblum segs? Did all other segs
have non-zeros, but clbum have 0s? And did you get non-0s in the 2nd
commandline?
On 07/07/2016 05:16 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
> Thank you very much Doug for your answer.
> Kindly I have one more question:
> Although
Some of this might be fixed with a newer version of optseq:
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/optseq2
The long last NULL might not be fixed. It is just hard to get all the
things to add up to get the right amount of time, so it time is left
over, it adds it to the
Well you can start by telling us what you did. There is not much info
down there
On 07/14/2016 10:40 AM, Mahtab Farahbakhsh wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer,
>
> I am doing group analysis for thickness and LGI values. I have just
> got the output and the output of both analyses (sig.mgh file view in
>
I can't tell from the glmfit command line what you are trying to do.
Generally, the GLM is run on group data and you specify an average brain
(eg, fsaverage) as the --surf.
On 07/14/2016 06:10 AM, Chatzi, Vasiliki wrote:
>
>
> Dear Developers,
>
>
> I am trying to run the mri_glmfit command and
Can you run the command below and send me dng.log?
register-sess -debug -s nmr00978 -d
/autofs/cluster/neuromind/dwakeman/tsc_pilot/subjects -fsd sycabs -dof 6
-per-run -nolog -update |& tee dng.log
On 07/14/2016 02:51 PM, Hibert, Matthew Louis wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm running into an error
Use the GLM approach (cross-sectional, not longitudinal). You don't need
a variable to regress against, just set up two groups, with one group
being your single subject. Though I'm not sure what you want to gain out
of this.
On 07/15/2016 04:08 PM, Aman Montazeri wrote:
> Hi Freesurferes,
>
>
I think you may be using a very old version of mri_segstats. The version
5.3 mri_segstats gives:
# Measure BrainSeg, BrainSegVol, Brain Segmentation Volume,
1290472.00, mm^3
# Measure BrainSegNotVent, BrainSegVolNotVent, Brain Segmentation Volume
Without Ventricles, 1279674.00, mm^3
It does not look like the variables are demeaned (your FSGD file below)
Variables Age eTIV EnglishParityRT
Input Math_5001m Monolingual_male 18 1865790.30866 -8952.208
Input Math_5002m Monolingual_female 19 1520429.68796 -4605.208
Input Math_5003m Monolingual_male 19 1749716.72939
Hello FS Listserv members,
With regard to checking amygdala segmentation, is it appropriate to overlay
the aseg.mgz file on the brainmask.mgz? Or should I be overlaying aseg.mgz
on norm.mgz? I am aware of the general rule of thumb that editing the
subcortical segmentations generally is not
Hello,
I am beginning a new study and would like to determine the optimal T2
acquisition parameters for improved pial surface results from FreeSurfer. I am
wondering if there is a difference in using a T2 or T2-FLAIR. I have found a
discussion post from 2014 which provided useful information
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your reply. I just sent you this subject's directory via file drop.
Please note that there are two aseg.stats files under the 'stats' folder:
aseg.stats: generated by the mri_segstats command I ran including the
--brainmask mri/brainmask.mgz --brain-vol-from-seg flags.
Hi Doug
My apologies for the delay - I just returned from vacation.
Ok, so when I take a volumetric spam created using minc tools and create an
overlay from it using mri_vol2surf, the min and max seems to be between 1
and 255. I am wondering if there is any where to change this into a %? When
I
Try running make_average_volume. This will produce an aseg.mgz file with
all the ROIs merged across all subjects
On 07/13/2016 07:10 AM, Dr Sampada Sinha wrote:
> Dear Bruce, I am trying to generate the following picture (please see
> attached) for eod vs lod groups. Can you please tell me
That does look suspicious, esp since BrainSegNotVent should be smaller
than BrainSeg. Can you tar up the subject and send it to me? It may be
some strange incompatibility with v5
On 07/07/2016 03:50 PM, Eryilmaz, H. Hamdi wrote:
> Hello Doug and Freesurfers,
>
> I am trying to compute a
Hi Doug,
Thank you for your response. The current fsgd file I sent you was with the
covariates demeaned x 100, as I saw you recommend that to someone else. We
previously tried doing just the demeaned values without multiplying by 100,
and that still had the badly scaled error. Do you think we
So we were able to figure out how to segment the different parts of the
brain using the bert sample, but have run into another problem.
I would like to save each segmentation so that I can import it into matlab
and create a matrix in order to create a mesh. The volume segment saves a
as a .vtk
nope, I would start with the aseg and only check other things if the
ventricles aren't accurate
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Tamara Tavares wrote:
Thank you again Bruce.
Since I am primarily interested in ventricular volume, do you think it is
necessary to check the the brainmask.mgz for bright or
Dear All,
I recently tried to gain access the read-only CVS source-code repository,
however, I have this kind of error:
cvs server: cannot find module `dev' - ignored
cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
anyone have idea what is going on here?
Thank you so much!
Best,
Yun Wang
On 07/12/2016 11:03 PM, Lee Subin Kristine wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
>
> Thanks a lot for the page! It was very helpful.
>
>
> I have a few questions about one of the commands and a question for
> one of the output files.
>
>
> 1)*mri_gtmpvc --i pet.nii.gz --reg template.reg.lta--psf FWHM--seg
>
Hi Bruce,
Thank you for your quick reply.
We are primarily interested in ventricular volume but we may look at other
areas in the future; this is why I thought it would be a good idea to check
the surfaces. Is the reasoning why the surface outputs vs. aseg outputs
should be checked is because
Hi Tamara
no, the surfaces shouldn't affect the volume of the ventricles, so if
that is all you care about just inspect the aseg.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016,
Tamara Tavares wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thank you for your quick reply.
We are primarily interested in ventricular volume but we may
Dear FreeSurfer,
I am trying to register my SPM activation maps to the structural data of
each subjects. Except for the commands I could find for the registration, I
could not find a guide on the registration of activation maps from SPM to
FreeSurfer. Would you please guide me how I should do
You can extract frames from a multi frame file with
mri_convert input.nii.gz --frame 0 output.frame0.nii.gz
On 07/12/2016 02:29 PM, Afzal, Afsana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with a dataset that outputs only one file (not two
> separate mag and phase files) for the fieldmap. The data was also
When FS reads a series of dicom files, it tries to sort them in time and
space so that it can generate the appropriate 4D volume. To do this, it
needs to get info out of the DICOM header to determine this sorting.
This includes image number and geometry information. If that information
is not
This is almost surely a problem with scaling as your covariates are
huge. Try subtracting the mean and dividing by the stddev before
entering into the FSGD file. Compute the means and stddevs across all
subjects.
doug
On 07/11/2016 03:20 PM, Jennifer Legault wrote:
> Hi Freesurfer Experts,
>
>
Thank you again Bruce.
Since I am primarily interested in ventricular volume, do you think it is
necessary to check the the brainmask.mgz for bright or dark spots
indicating an intensity normalization error? As well, what about a skull
strip error such as removal of brain tissue? I have noticed
Hi Ri
I think you can just run it all as one recon-all command.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 18 Jul
2016, Ritobrato Datta wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have some subjects who have both wm errors and gm errors.
>
> Is the following workflow possible
>
>
> Step 1) control points for the white matter edits.
Hi All,
We have some subjects who have both wm errors and gm errors.
Is the following workflow possible
Step 1) control points for the white matter edits. DONT RUN recon-all
Step 2) add the pial surface edits. DONT RUN recon-all
Step 3) Run recon-all to incorporate control points for wm
Dear All,
I recently tried to gain access the read-only CVS source-code repository,
however, I have this kind of error:
cvs server: cannot find module `dev' - ignored
cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
anyone have idea what is going on here?
Thank you so much!
Best,
Yun Wang
Hi Mahtab
check out bbregister. It should do the trick.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Mahtab
Farahbakhsh wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer,
> I am trying to register my SPM activation maps to the structural data of
> each subjects. Except for the commands I could find for the registration, I
>
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I am following the mass-univariate (spatiotemporal) model in the LME tutorial.
My design matrix X has the following columns:
intercept, time, time², group1, group1*time, group1*time², group2, group2*time,
group2*time², sex, age, mean_thickness
I actually have 3 groups
51 matches
Mail list logo