Hi Freesurferers
Could you please let me know how I should calculate the high pass filter
cutoff? I have seen a bunch of different formulas (i.e 1.5*the stimulation
period)?
My task is a block-designed task, each stimuli takes 16 seconds and is followed
by the next stimuli without an ITI.
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer developers,We have a volume that assigns unique numerical
labels to each of the ROIs it contains, in NIFTI format. I want to register it
to MNI152 (1mm) space, so that I can map it on my subjects and use
mris_anatomical_stats.I have
External Email - Use Caution
Hi freesurfer developers,
I am trying to run mri segstats for multiple subjects but the following
only produces one text file for the first subject. Any idea what I am doing
wrong?
for subj in $(cat sessid.txt); do
mri_segstats --seg
Hi Haewon
The problem is that you will never be able to distinguish a scanner effect from
a real biological effect since they are in the same subspace. At the very least
you should find some control data on both scanners to show that there is no
bias in the direction of the effect you are
External Email - Use Caution
Nevermind, I solved it myself.
For others who may find this question later: I ran mris_curvature on both
surfaces and compared the resulting .H files with the data in lh.curv, and the
values in lh.curv are identical with those obtained by running
External Email - Use Caution
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I would like to know whether the mean curvature files generated by recon-all
(at /surf/?h.curv and ?h.curv.fwhmxx.fsaverage.mgh) contain the
curvature for the white or for the pial surface?
Thanks,
Tim
--
Dr. Tim Schäfer
External Email - Use Caution
Dear FreeSurfer Devs
I got a comment about including a SNR variable in my main stats analysis and so
came across a Rosen et al 2018 paper which refers to the Euler number. I then
checked the archives and came across a
External Email - Use Caution
Site effects, even from different scanners with comparable sequences, are a big
issue is neuroimaging and discussed in many papers. I think you should be very
careful with interpretation of results, especially since in your case, the
scanners were