Re: [Freesurfer] tkmedit on ssh remote machine error

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Jon Wieser wie...@uwm.edu wrote: both machines have Mac OS X 10.6.8 the tkmedit works fine when not logged in remotely there is no error and the brain image is there Did you do ssh -Y or have ForwardX11Trusted yes in your ssh.config? Richard

Re: [Freesurfer] Must have compute capability 2 for GCAMORPH_ON_GPU CUDA device

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Clive Wong hycw...@gmail.com wrote: I'm new to CUDA. I tried to use CUDA in my environment, it gives the message below: Testing for CUDA device: nvcc: NVIDIA (R) Cuda compiler driver Copyright (c) 2005-2012 NVIDIA Corporation Built on

Re: [Freesurfer] Parallel vs. Sequential part

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: I think that the theoretical ratio is much bigger than what you would be able to achieve in practice. It's hard to compute exactly, but for example for em_reg it should be the number of samples (which are processed

Re: [Freesurfer] Parallel vs. Sequential part

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Akio Yamamoto yamam...@tkl.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote: Yes, as Richard pointed out, I just wanted to know the numbers for input to Amdahl's law, if you have already something, to figure out the maximum expected speedup using multiple processors/cores. As for

Re: [Freesurfer] Resend: error in compiling Freesurfer with GPU support

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Akio Yamamoto yamam...@tkl.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote: Compiling FreeSurfer with GPU support failed with the error message which is added to the end of this email. The current build environment is as follows: GeForce GTX 690 CUDA Toolkit 4.2 CentOS 6.3 I

Re: [Freesurfer] Memory Consumption of GPU-assisted Freesurfer?

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Zhongtian Dai d...@uchicago.edu wrote: I wonder how much graphic card memory is needed by the CUDA commands. We have two Quadro NVS 295's with 256MB memory and the CUDA commands all report out of memory errors. I know the cards are kind of outdated but I want to

Re: [Freesurfer] Memory Consumption of GPU-assisted Freesurfer?

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Zhongtian Dai d...@uchicago.edu wrote: Thanks for the speedy response. I think we will go with GTX 660 Ti with 2GB GPU RAM. We don't have a lot of subjects (as we hope to have) to analyze, so maybe we will try splitting left and right hemispheres to two graphic

Re: [Freesurfer] queue software and routine to remove dura from brain

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: locally we use pbsubmit, but really any queue software should be fine. Note that pbsubmit is a Martinos-Center wrapper to OpenPBS/Torque Resource Manager. An alternative is Sun^H^H^HOracle Grid Engine (which is also

Re: [Freesurfer] muliple fressurfer instance and cuda

2011/7/8 Knut J Bjuland knut...@hotmail.com: It work fine with just one GPU-assisted recon-all. Sorry, I messed up earlier, and didn't send my reply to the list. your experience makes sense, since the Freesurfer programs make no attempt to share the GPU beyond that which the driver imposes.

Re: [Freesurfer] Nvidia upgrade considerations

2011/8/5 Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior p...@netfilter.com.br: In my experience you'll have the benefit of using two cards simultaneously. That means you can run two recon-all with gpu acceleration simultaneously. The SLI is more important for graphics (cad, gaming) than for CUDA. So,

Re: [Freesurfer] Nvidia upgrade considerations

2011/8/5 Andries R. Van Der Leij a.r.vanderl...@gmail.com: For my supervisor, what kind of performance increase should I expect if we buy a newer nehalem system? Freesurfer as a whole is quite keen on the improved memory subsystem offered by Nehalem. A figure of 2x (CPU only stream) is

Re: [Freesurfer] How to run a benchmark on GPU with FreeSufer?

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Leo Souza lso...@nvidia.com wrote: Does anyone knows how do I run a benchmark test on GPU with FreeSurfer and CUDA? Beyond running a comparison between [x] and [x]_cuda? If you want numbers on individual routines, then the cudatest directory holds a lot of

Re: [Freesurfer] How to run a benchmark on GPU with FreeSufer?

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Leo Souza lso...@nvidia.com wrote: I want to verify what's the performance of different GPUs using FreeSurfer as Benchmark App. In that case, the two best programs to run are mri_em_register[_cuda] for linear registration mri_ca_register[_cuda] for nonlinear

Re: [Freesurfer] How to run a benchmark on GPU with FreeSufer?

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Leo Souza lso...@nvidia.com wrote: Can you provide quick instructions on how to run those tests? I am new to FreeSurfer. I'll have to defer to others on running those two programs - it's been too long since I worked on Freesurfer. I believe the website has some

Re: [Freesurfer] Using different versions of FS for the same dataset (5.0 and 5.1)

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Alexander Lebedev awl...@rambler.ru wrote: Thank you very much for your response! May I also ask how about running CUDA and non-CUDA analyses for the same dataset? I am asking because I don't have CUDA support on one of my machines as well (It has ATI

Re: [Freesurfer] Problem writing talairach.m3z in mri_ca_register

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Lauge Emil Borch Laurs S0rensen lau...@diku.dk wrote: I run it on our local cluster and there is plenty of memory. Here is the memory print out from top: Mem:  18479108k total,  7724396k used, 10754712k free,   369152k buffers Swap: 72019344k total,  1475720k

Re: [Freesurfer] Parallelization

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Spencer Boucher sbouc...@stanford.edu wrote: New to Freesurfer here, but I was wondering if there is any viability to the idea of parallelizing freesurfer for running on multiple servers so as to reduce the time required to run recon-all on a single subject.

Re: [Freesurfer] FreeSurfer Compiling error

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Jordi Delgado jordi...@pic.es wrote: I'm trying to compile freesurfer with --enable-fermi-gpu and cuda 4. The process stopped with this error message: I'm not certain, but I believe CUDA 4 has thrust included. This might conflict with the version installed in

Re: [Freesurfer] CUDA Error in file '/space/freesurfer/build/minerva/stable/dev/include/ctfactory.hpp' on line 92 : invalid texture reference

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Hemant Bokil hemantbo...@gmail.com wrote: Driver : 4.10 Runtime : 3.20 My best guess would be this mismatch causing a problem. It shouldn't in theory, but... Richard ___ Freesurfer mailing list

Re: [Freesurfer] CUDA Error in file '/space/freesurfer/build/minerva/stable/dev/include/ctfactory.hpp' on line 92 : invalid texture reference

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Hemant Bokil hemantbo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the response. Does this mean that I should use CUDA 3.2 ? There was some discussion on the group recently about Freesurfer not working with CUDA 4 and one suggestion made was to switch to CUDA 3.2. Thanks,

Re: [Freesurfer] Experiences with GPU-assisted recon-all

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Abdulkadir Ahmed ahmed.abdulka...@epfl.ch wrote: Freesurfer supports GPU acceleration since version 5.0. To assess the utility of this functionality, particularly the gain in performance, I performed `recon-all` with and without the option `-use-gpu`. I'd like

Re: [Freesurfer] small difference in recon-all for Ubuntu 11.10 and Centos 5.7

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Knut J Bjuland knut...@hotmail.com wrote: I used recon-all on two different system one with Ubuntu 11.10 and a cluster with Centos 5.7. When I compare the recon-all of these two recon-all run I see that there is a small difference. Is this difference caused by

Re: [Freesurfer] Another -use-gpu experiment

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Burns, Scott S scott.s.bu...@vanderbilt.edu wrote: 2) Separately from the above experiment, I ran one gpu subject using 4 GTX 480s and saw no significant time difference.  Is this to be expected, ie your CUDA code doesn't scale across multiple GPUs? Just

Re: [Freesurfer] Error from cudadetect

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Howison, Mark mhowi...@brown.edu wrote: We have installed Freesurfer 5.0.0 (CentOS x86_64) on our compute cluster at Brown and are seeing the following error when running 'cudadetect': ERROR: cuda driver does not appear to be installed! Detecting CUDA...

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 22 June 2016 at 18:17, Derek Pisner wrote: > Anyone manage to successfully configure recon-all to run with -use-gpu for > recent cuda toolkit versions? I realize cuda support has ceased over the past > few years for Freesurfer, but have there been any

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 22 June 2016 at 19:32, Derek Pisner wrote: > Thanks for the very quick reply. Good to know that someone has successfully > compiled GPU binaries for newer CUDA versions. I took a quick look at the > developer's guide for building the cuda binaries from

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 23 June 2016 at 22:44, Derek Pisner wrote: > Fixed the gcc problems as well (this required a tweak to host_config.h in > /usr/local/cuda/include). Now, I've hit another roadblock: > > Makefile:4542: recipe for target 'libutils_cuda_a-mrisurf.o' failed >

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 23 June 2016 at 16:26, Derek Pisner wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Hope this finds you well. I followed your instructions and compiled from > source (you were right-- compiling Fs from source isn't too bad at all!) I > also made your tweak to configure.in and then

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 24 June 2016 at 05:34, R Edgar <freesurfer@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 June 2016 at 22:44, Derek Pisner <dpis...@psychiatry.arizona.edu> wrote: > >> Fixed the gcc problems as well (this required a tweak to host_config.h in >> /usr/local/cuda/include). N

Re: [Freesurfer] Fwd: hardware question

On 28 January 2016 at 11:51, Z K wrote: > How many cores/processors? In an earlier email you stated that you > wanted to process many recons at the same time. If this is the case than > the number of processors would be the limiting factor. > > FYI: Freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Building from source #2 -- dynamic binding

On 20 February 2016 at 17:28, Bruce Fischl wrote: > hmmm, the only thing that worries me about dynamic linking is that it > will add variability to the outputs. Zeke has spent endless amounts of time > tracking down e.g. mac vs. pc differences in math libs and such.

Re: [Freesurfer] Building from source #2 -- dynamic binding

On 21 February 2016 at 22:33, wrote: > Intolerable differences have not been found. They are always minor <%5 and > their source can come from several places. For example, different > compilers (or even different versions of the same compiler) can have > different

Re: [Freesurfer] OpenMP and GPU implementation in freesurfer 6 beta

On 7 March 2016 at 11:25, Francis Tyson Thomas wrote: > That information was a lot helpful. At this point I'm currently trying to > reduce the recon-all processing time as much as possible and for this reason > I was looking to get the -use-gpu flag working. I'm

Re: [Freesurfer] OpenMP and GPU implementation in freesurfer 6 beta

On 24 March 2016 at 04:15, Francis Tyson Thomas wrote: > The issue I faced was after following all your instructions when I cam to > the step of "make j4" it threw an error saying that it was not able to find > -lcudart. And it looked like it was looking for it

Re: [Freesurfer] OpenMP and GPU implementation in freesurfer 6 beta

On 3 March 2016 at 13:22, Francis Tyson Thomas wrote: > Also, it looks like development for GPU usage has been halted for now and so > I was trying to use the CUDA 5 for getting it working under ubuntu 14.04. I > have been not successful that as the cuda device

Re: [Freesurfer] X graphics issues via SSH

On 11 May 2016 at 16:03, Rockers, Elijah D. wrote: > Running a Mac Pro, OS X El Capitan 10.11.4 > With ATI Radeon Graphics card, and XQuartz v 2.7.9 > > I am able to run Qdec and freeview perfectly fine on my machine. The problem > comes when I attempt to SSH into

Re: [Freesurfer] X graphics issues via SSH

On 12 May 2016 at 17:12, Z K wrote: > Eli, Thanks for this update. I am very much interested in the where this > is headed. Me too - sorry for missing the bit about "used to work" Richard ___ Freesurfer mailing list

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 27 June 2016 at 01:27, Derek Pisner wrote: > Was not able to resolve this quite yet. I figured out that I had to backtrack > a bit because I was having trouble getting the complete set of data files > from the Fs ftp server using "git annex ." And now it

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 1 July 2016 at 04:30, Dr. M. Shahid wrote: > I have one question here. If the code compiles using sdk 7.5 or latest, will > the resulting binary be FS v6? I wonder if the mri_ca_register_cuda code is > also changed in v6 tree...and if mixing of binaries from

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 1 July 2016 at 17:48, Derek Pisner wrote: > Here is the output attachment. Hmmm this is the actual error: == gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include/dicom -I../xml2 -I../include/NrrdIO -DTEEM_DIO=0 -DTEEM_32BIT=0 -DTEEM_QNANHIBIT=1

Re: [Freesurfer] Any updates on recon-all GPU support?

On 2 July 2016 at 19:06, Derek Pisner wrote: > Thanks anyway for taking a look. Despite a number of further tweaks to our > cuda libraries, we have made no further progress with this. Any chance you > could pass along your cuda binaries so that I can see

Re: [Freesurfer] which CUDA version driver to use

On 15 August 2016 at 19:21, Karamfil Bahchevanov wrote: > I'd like to experiment with faster proceesing, in fact I'd like to try CUDA. > However there are several possible drivers for my quadro K2000. I'm not sure > which one to choose. Should I install the latest 7.5.

Re: [Freesurfer] CUDA in FS6?

On 1 February 2017 at 05:47, Chris Adamson wrote: > Are the CUDA binaries still being developed in FS6? Are they compatible with > the CPU only versions? > I remember asking questions about this a while ago and apparently the cuda > binaries were no longer being

Re: [Freesurfer] CUDA in FS6?

On 2 February 2017 at 22:58, Chris Adamson wrote: > I have tested a recon-all -all CPU and GPU with and without the -hires option > and everything seems to run fine. So at the moment they seem to be compatible > or at least the GPU version doesn't crash. So that is

Re: [Freesurfer] CUDA in FS6?

On 1 February 2017 at 22:07, Chris Adamson wrote: > I understand they are not a priority. But are they compatible with the CPU > versions? Should we be using the CUDA versions if they aren't guaranteed to > be up-to-date? I haven't run any comparisons against the

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer v6.0 / Developer version GPU implementation

On 13 February 2017 at 18:15, Francis Tyson Thomas wrote: > I'm trying to reduce the freesurfer runtime as much as possible and I was > wondering if the GPU flags still work for recon-all in Freesurfer v6? If not > is it possible to use the developer version to

Re: [Freesurfer] Building Freesurfer dev with GPU support/CUDA enabled

On 28 February 2017 at 01:10, Francis Tyson Thomas wrote: > > See utils/test/mriBuildVoronoiDiagramFloat/test-suite.log > Please report to freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >

Re: [Freesurfer] Building Freesurfer dev with GPU support/CUDA enabled

On 1 March 2017 at 03:28, Francis Tyson Thomas wrote: > I have attached the log file as you had requested. This is the error: gzip: testdata.tar.gz: No such file or directory tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Exiting with failure status due to

Re: [Freesurfer] Reproducibility of freesurfer analyses across different version of linux

On 29 August 2016 at 02:24, Knut J Bjuland wrote: > Is it possible to use a script to extract information about which library > that is used for each recons?Or are there any other means to get this > information? I'm not sure about that. At least some of the info is

Re: [Freesurfer] Reproducibility of freesurfer analyses across different version of linux

On 28 August 2016 at 06:59, Knut J Bjuland wrote: > I found this paper about named “Reproducibility of neuroimaging analyses > across operating systems” (Glatard et al., 2015). There were differences > in cortical morphometry like cortical thicknes between images

Re: [Freesurfer] which CUDA version driver to use

On 24 August 2016 at 03:57, Карамфил бахчеванов wrote: > Compiling is something new for me, but will try it. Well, install the binaries, and try that first Richard ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all error using GPU in OS X Sierra

On 16 November 2016 at 22:33, June Kang wrote: > I'm attempting to run recon-all using -use-gpu option in Mac Pro 5,1 with OS > X 10.12.1. > I am using GTX980 rom-flashed edition, and it supports CUDA properly with > other tools. > Current cuda version is 8.0, and cudadetect

Re: [Freesurfer] What is the latest 'supported' CUDA version?

On 17 November 2016 at 18:10, June Kang wrote: > Anybody know which CUDAversion is the latest one supported by freesurfer? I'm trying to provide some support for the CUDA implementations, but I don't have that much time to devote to it. > Now I am trying to remove CUDA 8 and

Re: [Freesurfer] differences between OS recon all output, longitudinal data

On 15 November 2016 at 11:01, anonymous anonymous wrote: > Oks, thank you! > > Last question! And using CUDA this time... would the results also differ? Most certainly. For example the GPU version does quite a few reduction sums, where the regular CPU code does

Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all -use-gpu and cuda version

On 2 December 2016 at 09:38, Parzer, Peter wrote: > I just tried recon-all with the -use-gpu flag from the current development > version of freesurfer (freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20161123-bb356e0), > but it fail with the message that is cannot open

Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all -use-gpu and cuda version

On 5 December 2016 at 03:07, Parzer, Peter wrote: > where did you get the sources? I could not find them on any of the download > pages. Instructions on accessing the read-only git server:

Re: [Freesurfer] Computer Hardware Requirements (iMAC)

On 5 January 2017 at 20:41, Alexandre Boutet wrote: > Essentially, I want to use this workstation for various FreeSurfer > applications (such as subcortical segmentation and cortical analysis) > including FreeView and I am trying to find out if it is worth it

Re: [Freesurfer] Computer Hardware Requirements (iMAC)

On 5 January 2017 at 19:36, Alexandre Boutet wrote: > I apologize if a similar question was asked approximately 6 months ago but I > just want to double check the information validated by a single person > previously. > > I'm thinking about starting a cortical

Re: [Freesurfer] cuda-gpu problem

On 22 May 2017 at 07:39, Ramesh Babu wrote: > The following last line get repeated same way except (%) in the second line > pasted below. On the third line "Did not call MRIsetResolution", is it error > or normal process? Since repeated many times I thought there is

Re: [Freesurfer] Installing and enabling cuda

On 22 May 2017 at 08:44, Ramesh Babu wrote: > After compiling in the same way as given in the webpage, I couldn't reboot. > It was showing a message that "running low graphic mode". It was not opening > the desktop. Then through ctrl+alt+f1, I uninstalled nvida and

Re: [Freesurfer] cuda-gpu problem

On 20 May 2017 at 00:56, Ramesh Babu wrote: > I am using Intel® Core™ i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz × 8 processor with 15.6 GiB > ram, GeForce GT 610/PCIe/SSE2 graphic card. > > I have successfully installed cuda runtime version 5.0. After that I > performed cuda detect and

Re: [Freesurfer] -usegpu vs -parallel in recon-all

On 17 May 2017 at 18:40, Octavian Lie wrote: > With FS6, -parallel -openmp x can really speed things up. I inherited code > from prior versions using -usegpu flag for GPU/CUDA (not supported more > recently). Is the latter redundant or affecting in any way the -parallel >

Re: [Freesurfer] Installing and enabling cuda

On 16 May 2017 at 23:10, Ramesh Babu wrote: > I have come across that I have freesurfer support cuda version 5, but I have > already installed latest version. > Can I use latest version for freeesurfer or should I install version 5? > Since I am not expert in this

Re: [Freesurfer] Cuda 8, Centos 7, FreeSurfer 6

On 19 May 2017 at 00:37, neuroimage analyst wrote: > We recently installed Centos 7 with cuda 8 and tried to build the FreeSurfer > 6.0 using the wiki instructions but were unsuccessful to do so. Has anyone > successfully built FreeSurfer 6 on Cuda 8 (Centos 7) and

Re: [Freesurfer] Installing and enabling cuda

On 21 May 2017 at 23:40, Ramesh Babu wrote: > Thank you for your reply. I tried to compile by looking FAQ about CUDA in > Ubuntu Ask, but it is get corrupted and I am forced to uninstall both NVIDIA > driver and CUDA. I need help to compile it. Can I get some

Re: [Freesurfer] cuda-gpu problem

On 22 May 2017 at 03:10, Ramesh Babu wrote: > I have attached two documents. One document contains report with -use-gpu > flag which I have interrupted and another document is without -use-gpu flag, > completed without any error. Wherever report differ from normal run

Re: [Freesurfer] Installing and enabling cuda

On 25 May 2017 at 01:20, Ramesh Babu wrote: > There is some response for cudadetect command which I have pated in earlier > mail. But no ./cudadetect file. > > rb@rameshbabu:~$ ./cudadetect > bash: ./cudadetect: No such file or directory That's... not altogether

Re: [Freesurfer] Installing and enabling cuda

On 24 May 2017 at 00:36, Ramesh Babu wrote: > Now I am getting confusion, really which version of cuda I have?. Because > when I give these command "cudadetect" nvcc -V, and cat > /usr/local/cuda/version.txt I am getting different answers. > > rb@rameshbabu:~$

Re: [Freesurfer] Installing and enabling cuda

On 23 May 2017 at 01:13, Ramesh Babu wrote: > Ok. I will try cuda 8.0 and let you know the result. Should I install cuda 5 > before installing cuda 8? or Can I run both? You'll only be able to have one version of the CUDA driver, but you should be able to have

Re: [Freesurfer] cuda-gpu problem

On 23 May 2017 at 01:10, Ramesh Babu wrote: > I have one question. When use -use-gpu flag, can I use -itkthreads 8 or -use > openmp 8 flag? That's not something I've tested. I think that OpenMP at least is OK (things will run in parallel on the CPU or the GPU.

Re: [Freesurfer] [SpamVerdacht!] Re: cudadetect fails: wrong amount of memory and number of cores detected

On 25 August 2017 at 07:10, wrote: > thank you for that hint. I will try to download all required packages and to > compile FreeSurfer myself. Make sure that you install the latest NVIDIA SDK - and that the Freesurfer compile is picking it up. Richard

Re: [Freesurfer] cudadetect fails: wrong amount of memory and number of cores detected

On 24 August 2017 at 05:59, wrote: > I would like to use recon-all with the option "-use-gpu" so I ran cudadetect > first to see whether the nvidia card on my system will be detected. But at > least the values for total amount of memory and number of cores are wrong >

Re: [Freesurfer] GPU compile cuda8/centos7

On 27 November 2017 at 11:02, Meij, Henk wrote: > Just wanted to report back a success. I had to do some fixes so hope this > helps anybody. > > My gpus are GTX1080Ti and the CPU involved is E5-2620 dual 10 core on this > server. > > The vanilla cpu recon-all finished in 7

Re: [Freesurfer] GPU compile cuda8/centos7

On 28 November 2017 at 09:12, Dr. M. Shahid wrote: > Has all of the GPU code also been updated in the new FS6.0 version or the > code is still from the old 5.x but can be compiled with new cuda toolkits? I made a small tweak for GCAMorph (primarily ca_register) which

Re: [Freesurfer] GPU compile cuda8/centos7

On 30 November 2017 at 09:42, Dr. M. Shahid wrote: >> > Has all of the GPU code also been updated in the new FS6.0 version or >> > the >> > code is still from the old 5.x but can be compiled with new cuda >> > toolkits? >> >> I made a small tweak for GCAMorph

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer compilation for supporting cuda9.1

On 13 January 2018 at 06:11, zuxfoucault Wong wrote: > I made some modification and finally can compile freesurfer that gets > recon-all with cuda9.1 support. I will try to make time to find out if there are still compile issues. It's been a while since I tried a

Re: [Freesurfer] GPU/supercomputer adaptation of freesurfer?

External Email - Use Caution Sorry I'm coming to this a bit late I'm not sure that the CUDA implementation is supported these days. I've not done much work on em_ and ca_register since 2012; I'm not sure about the surface stream (I didn't do that port). Furthermore, I don't

Re: [Freesurfer] ECC or non-ECC Memory?

External Email - Use Caution On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 02:41, fsbuild wrote: > For this to work, I think the (hardware) memory controller and the CPU need > to support ECC as well. So if the motherboard you are spec'ing out does not > explicitly say it supports ECC, then I would