Thank you so much.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Douglas Greve
wrote:
> It is already built into the HRF model. If you need to shift them more or
> less than what is in the model, that can be accommodated. If you use the
> -spmhrf option, then you will get the same
Dear Dr. Douge,
I am a little bit confused about creating function ROI in V1.
Basically, I have some localizers that for some ROIs I need to find
activated neurons in a specific contrast in native space and then create
that ROI and map it to my experimental scans and extract their voxel data.
I
Hi experts,
I was wondering if there is any tutorial or example on FIR analysis. I
don't know where to start.
I need to look at the time course of some voxels. I have a localizer
session and the main experiment. I am intending to find the ROIs in the
localizer scans and then extract their time
Hi Doug,
I have used spmhrf 0 in my FS-FAST analysis. I was wondering if there is
any way to check the variance explained and fits on the model?
Thank you,
-S
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
> On 02/20/2018 12:07 PM, Sarah Cole wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> >
> > I have used spmhrf 0 in my FS-FAST analysis. I was wondering if there
> > is any way to check the variance explained an
Hi,
I was wondering if this method is still applicable in version 6
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CreatingROIs
I cannot seem to find any of the options for creating an ROI.
Thank you,
S
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Hi,
Could someone please let me know how to get the percent signal change for
raw signal intensity?
I think the cespct.nii.gz gives me the contrast as %. However, I am not
sure about dividing h.nii and h-offset.nii. What are they?
Thank you
___
coefficients) that
> is included for backwards compatibility. What do you mean by % signal
> change? Do you want the raw waveform as a percent?
>
>
> On 02/15/2018 01:52 PM, Sarah Cole wrote:
> > Thank you, Doug.
> >
> > Sorry for not being clear. Could you please
N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> wrote:
> It divides the contast (ces) by voxel-wise mean. I'm not sure I
> understand your quesstion about h and h-offset
>
>
> On 02/15/2018 01:04 PM, Sarah Cole wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone please let me kn
External Email - Use Caution
Hi,
I know this is not an error but just a comment. But may I know what this
means:
"*key nSliceGroups unrecognized, line 11, skipping"*
I tried to look for line 11 in matlab scripts but they are mainly commented
out.
Thank you,
Sara
,
Sarah
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Hoopes, Andrew <ahoo...@mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:
> Hi Sarah, I updated the wiki page. We actually just put up a standalone,
> dev freeview app today.
>
> best
> Andrew
>
>
> On February 27, 2018 at 11:38:57 AM, Sarah Cole (coleashle
Hi Doug/Zeke,
Could you please update the page for freeview update on Mac- if it is
available.
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/UpdateFreeview
Thanks,
S
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
I apologize. I was wrong.
Thanks,
S
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Sarah Cole <coleashle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It doesn't work on tksurfer. But it's ok.
>
> So Doug, is this the latest tutorial: https://surfer.nmr.mgh.
> harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultiModalFmriI
Just one clarification, this is for first level analysis (individual
subjects).
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Sarah Cole <coleashle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> At the end of my FSFAST analysis, I would like to plot the Canonical HRF
> shape generated by FSFAS
Hi Doug,
At the end of my FSFAST analysis, I would like to plot the Canonical HRF
shape generated by FSFAST for my events. I have found this thread:
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/2013-July/031902.html
but I am not sure if I understand this line:
Hi Doug,
I need your recommendations on two topics. I really appreciate your help.
1.) I have two runs of the same experiment, each for about 12 minutes.
These 2 runs are different only in the presentation order of the stimuli. I
also have one localizer session which first, I calculated my
ing to do. can you send a picture? the default
> lag is TR/2
>
> On 3/29/18 2:30 PM, Sarah Cole wrote:
>
> Thanks, Doug.
>
> I added (-4s) delay and plotted the data but I got the same delay as no
> shift. Also I did (+4) delay and lost most of the activation.
>
> Do y
Hi Doug,
I have a block design experiment. After analyzing the data and plotting the
response magnitude across the TRs, we see that there is a systematic lag in
the response. For example, in a 16s block (TR=2s), at TR-1 and TR-2 the
response goes down and then starts rising from TR-3. This is
u can use the -delay flag in mkanalysis-sess
>
> doug
>
>
> On 03/28/2018 05:35 PM, Sarah Cole wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > I have a block design experiment. After analyzing the data and
> > plotting the response magnitude across the TRs, we see that there is a
rite(s,'percentchange.nii.gz')
>
>
>
> On 02/15/2018 02:03 PM, Sarah Cole wrote:
> > Yes, that's exactly what I am looking for. Raw waveform as a percent.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Douglas N Greve
> > <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr
Please ignore my previous post. I was wrong on so many levels!
Thanks
S
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Sarah Cole <coleashle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Sure. I have attached an excel sheet.
> I have averaged the signal magnitude across 16 blocks of objects, and 16
w
> instead), but I think it should still work
>
>
> On 02/23/2018 05:16 PM, Sarah Cole wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if this method is still applicable in version 6
> > https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CreatingROIs
> >
> >
> > I
22 matches
Mail list logo