Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

External Email - Use Caution Thanks. I have sent you the tar by FileDrop. Stefano > > Il 7 maggio 2018 alle 22.23 "Douglas N. Greve" > ha scritto: > > It should not have taken that long. If you want me to look, you can tar > up the glmdir

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

It should not have taken that long. If you want me to look, you can tar up the glmdir and send it to me on our filedrop (below). You can also use PALM. I've created a tool to assist in the interface http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsPalm On 05/07/2018 04:20 PM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: > > >

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

External Email - Use Caution Thanks. I have about 40 subjects. The last run went ahead for five days. I have killed it. What's do you think about the use of PALM in my study (details are listed in previous mails)? Best regards, Stefano > > Il 7 maggio 2018 alle 19.48

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

It looks right. How many subjects do you have? You can also check on the progress by looking at the csd files in the glmdir/csd folder On 05/03/2018 11:30 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: > > Hi list, > > I'm running the follow command lines: > > 1) mri_glmfit --y ces.nii.gz --cortex --surf

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

External Email - Use Caution Hi list, I'm running the follow command lines: 1) mri_glmfit --y ces.nii.gz --cortex --surf fsaverage rh --glmdir MMSE.wls --nii.gz --fsgd g1v1_MMSE.fsgd dods --C intercept.mtx --C slope.mtx --eres-save 2) mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir MMSE.wls --perm

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

External Email - Use Caution I'm running the follow command lines: 1) mri_glmfit --y ces.nii.gz --cortex --surf fsaverage rh --glmdir MMSE.wls --nii.gz --fsgd g1v1_MMSE.fsgd dods --C intercept.mtx --C slope.mtx --eres-save 2) mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir MMSE.wls --perm 1000 2.0 abs

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

Try permutation http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultipleComparisonsV6.0Perm On 4/24/18 8:21 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: Hi, I'm performing a group analysis. I would like to investigate a simple correlation analysis within group, aiming to map the clusters showing

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

External Email - Use Caution Hi, I'm performing a group analysis. I would like to investigate a simple correlation analysis within group, aiming to map the clusters showing correlation between the FC and the neuropsychological test scores (e.g. MMSE). Overall, the NPS test

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

External Email - Use Caution > Hi, group analysis. I would like to perform a simple correlation analysis within group, aiming to map the clusters reporting the correlation between the FC and the seed volume or neuropsychological test scores (e.g. MMSE). Overall, the

Re: [Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

I'm not sure what you mean. Can you elaborate? Is this an individual analysis or a group analysis? On 04/18/2018 10:10 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: > > Hi list, > > which the best way to perform a whole-brain correlation of the FC > assessed by FS-FAST with the volumetic or neuropsychological

[Freesurfer] Non-parametric correlation between FC and neuropsychological/volumetric outcomes

Hi list, which the best way to perform a whole-brain correlation of the FC assessed by FS-FAST with the volumetic or neuropsychological outcomes? Please note that my question is specifically addressed to those factors (neuropsycholgical scores or volume of seed) did not show a normal