Not in FS, sorry.
On 10/13/17 3:59 AM, 박경일 wrote:
So, I'm wondering if there is another way to draw statistical map
considering multiple factors including missing variables.
Thanks a lot.
Kyung
2017-10-10 6:09 GMT+09:00 Douglas Greve
do you mean you want to map the surface-based data into the volume? If
so, you can use mri_surf2vol. If you want to analyze your pet data in
the volume you can just do that with mri_glmfit
On 10/5/17 4:59 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Referring to the PETSURFER tutorial for dynamic PET
Does this happen repeatedly? You don't have to rerun recon-all again,
just that last mris_anatomical_stats command to see if it seg faults
again. If it does, first check your disk space, then load the left hemi
in freeview along with the annot and the cortex.label
On 10/13/17 11:05 AM, Keiko
Thank you for the input.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas Greve
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:09 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical surface
Hi Doug!
I just ran the mris_anatomica_stats on its own- and it ran successfully? Do
you know what may have caused it to fault?
Thank you very much!
Keiko
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Douglas Greve
wrote:
> Does this happen repeatedly? You don't have to rerun
That subcort mask is only GM (sorry, should have indicated that when I
named it).
On 10/13/17 11:15 AM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Hi Doug,
Yes, but I am using the GM rather than the subcortical volume. How can
we get a similar GM mask on CVS 2mm space?
Thanks for your help.
Best Wishes,
Elijah
Hi Doug,
> That subcort mask is only GM (sorry, should have indicated that when I named
> it).
>
I just looked at the subcort mask in the cvs 2mm folder and it looks like it is
only subcortical? I am looking for a similar mask that also includes the GM
regions. Any idea?
Best Wishes,
Got it. Thanks, Doug! :)
Best Wishes,
Elijah
> On 13 Oct 2017, at 17:06, Douglas Greve wrote:
>
> That subcort mask is only GM (sorry, should have indicated that when I named
> it).
>
> On 10/13/17 11:15 AM, Elijah Mak wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Yes, but I am using
Hi Doug,
I wonder what is the difference between this approach (mri_surf2vol) as opposed
to doing the MRTM2 modelling on the MGX GM output (58 frames), which will give
us the bp.nii.gz in volume space?
Thanks.
Best Wishes,
Elijah
> On 13 Oct 2017, at 16:19, Douglas Greve
I have applied the contrasts that we discussed in the previous mails but they
produce doubt results.
In summary, I aim to look at:
A- Difference between groups without considerer the covariate effect (I
suppose that the maps will be in the intercept folder) ---> ANOVA between 4
groups
B-
Hi Doug,
Yes, but I am using the GM rather than the subcortical volume. How can we get a
similar GM mask on CVS 2mm space?
Thanks for your help.
Best Wishes,
Elijah
Dr. Elijah Mak, Research Associate
Department of Psychiatry,
Old Age Psychiatry Group | Cambridge Intellectual &
It should not take that long. For only that number of scans it should
only take a few min.
On 10/12/17 1:10 PM, Keiko McCreary wrote:
Hi There,
Could someone tell me how long approximately dcmunpack should take? (I
have 243 files and it has been "interrogating" now for 2 hours.
Thank you!
that is the area of the white matter surface in mm2
On 10/12/17 2:15 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:
What measure is for the cortical surface area?
The measure in the aparc.stats file states ‘WhiteSurfArea’
Jim
The
The 2nd is the one you want as the first one includes non cortical
structures in the medial wall.
On 10/12/17 6:35 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> I ran this command:
> mris_anatomical_stats subjectID lh pial
> It gave me a total surface area of 115007 mm^2
>
> I also tried the
Dear FreeSurfer community,
I have a few questions regarding the usage of the LME matlab tools for
longitudinal data analyses, and how to set up the model. We have patients and
control data that we want to compare with respect to cortical changes over time
(two time points: baseline and
Are you using mri_vol2vol to go into the cvs 2mm space? If so, then use
$FREESURFER_HOME/subjects/cvs_avg35_inMNI152/mri.2mm/subcort.mask.mgz
On 10/11/17 3:15 PM, Elijah Mak wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks.
Could I check my workflow to perform the constrained smoothing of PET
MGX-GM volumes? My
Hello Bruce,
Thank you for the response. I meant the latter ( making maps etc). I want to do
something similar to the subcortical volume based analysis on PETSurfer page
however, on freesurfer T1. Freesurfer doesn't perform VBM hence, why should
there be a problem with interpretation?
Hi Paul
we typically do this type of analysis by looking at scatter plots of
structure volumes (e.g. hippocampus). Alternatively, you can make maps,
but that opens up all the problems/difficulties of interpretation of VBM.
Which did you mean?
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, miracle
Hello FreeSurfer experts,
I want to perform a whole brain volume based group analysis for cortical
and subcortical regions. That's something very similar to surface based
group analysis for cortical thickness however, for volume. Is there a
tutorial on how to do it? if yes, please can i get the
Hi all,
I was just wondering if there was any further insight into what I might be
doing wrong on this.
Thanks again!
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Neuro Lists wrote:
> Hi Doug and Bruce,
> I forgot to mention that I had tried that as well but without
So, I'm wondering if there is another way to draw statistical map
considering multiple factors including missing variables.
Thanks a lot.
Kyung
2017-10-10 6:09 GMT+09:00 Douglas Greve :
> You can't run it with missing variables
>
> On 10/9/17 12:40 AM, 박경일 wrote:
>
>
not really. If you're running on a cluster, sometimes there can be
communication issues where it can only read part of a file, but that is
just a wild guess
On 10/13/17 12:44 PM, Keiko McCreary wrote:
Hi Doug!
I just ran the mris_anatomica_stats on its own- and it ran
successfully? Do you
Hi Aziz,
The centos6-built packages seem to cause issues when building on ubuntu,
particularly for tcltk apps. I would ignore this for now, or you could compile
tcltk yourself. As a general fix, I’ll work on building a package distribution
on ubuntu16
best,
Andrew
On Oct 9, 2017, at 2:02 AM,
Dear all,
I have a ROI mask volume file and i would like to generate Mean cortical
thickness surface file (i.e lh.ROI.thickness.fsaverage.mgh and
rh.ROI.thickness.fsaverage.mgh) , could some one guide me how i could
obtain such file.
I have 120 subjects and I have done recon-all for all
24 matches
Mail list logo