Hej,
I was wondering if it is possible to open already edited scans and then
remove some of the voxels which previously has been edited (fx. at the pial
surface).
While editing you can offcourse undo, but i am thinking of after editing
and closing the program.
Best
Kasper
--
Kasper Jessen
start over with alle the edits i have done?
Best regards,
Kasper
--
Kasper Jessen,
Læge, klinisk assistent
Center for neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR)
Mental Health Centre Glostrup
Nordre Ringvej 29-67
2600 Glostrup
Tlf.: 24430136
E-mail: kaspe...@cnsr.dk eller kasper.jes...@
/neuropsychopharma/experimental.html
> <
> http://www.dppp.uzh.ch/research/psychiatric/neuropsychopharma/experimental.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> ht
-stable-pub-v5.3.0
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If
Dear FreeSurfer group,
I am running the univariate analysis to test if there is a change in thickness
between two groups over time. The dataset has a baseline and a follow-up scan
(i.e., two time points) and consist of about 40 patients and 40 controls.
I receive an an error which states "Algor
*
What do the above errors mean and is it something we should be worried
about?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
MD, PhD Student
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The i
- Does it matter where you place the 3T flag in the command line? fx
- recon-all -i -subjid -3T -all
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
MD, PhD student
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailma
managed? Is it possible to run freesurfer directly from the PAR/REC
file?
- Is the “Image geometries differ across time” related to the difference
in acquisition parameters mentioned in the warning?
Best regards
Kasper Jessen
2015-10-10 16:12 GMT+02:00 Bruce Fischl :
> Hi Kasper
>
>
Phd Student
--
Kasper Jessen,
MD, PhD student
Center for neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR)
Mental Health Centre Glostrup
Nordre Ringvej 29-67
2600 Glostrup
Tlf.: 24430136
E-mail: kaspe...@cnsr.dk eller kasper.jes...@regionh.dk
___
Freesurfer
using two timepoints, do
you still recommend to include all the 5 time points in creating the [BASE]
even though only 2 time points will be used?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https
:20:14 PDT 2015; root:xnu-2422.115.14~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
*iMac: *
build-stamp.txt: freesurfer-Darwin-lion-stable-pub-v5.3.0
Darwin Nikolajs-iMac.local 11.4.2 Darwin Kernel Version 11.4.2: Thu Aug 23
16:25:48 PDT 2012; root:xnu-1699.32.7~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
Dear freesurfer,
To clear up som confusion i would like to ask if there is a difference
between adding a -3T or -nuintensitycor3t flag?
Best regards,
Kasper
--
Kasper Jessen,
MD, PhD student
Center for neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR)
Mental Health Centre Glostrup
Nordre Ringvej
irach stage.
>
> Best,
> Lee
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Kasper Jessen wrote:
>
> Dear freesurfer,
>> To clear up som confusion i would like to ask if there is a difference
>> between adding a -3T or -nuintensitycor3t flag?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kaspe
is on the iMac 2.472 and on the MacPro
2.537.
Is it because of a randomization generator in FreeSurfer?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Thank you for your reply.
Okay - so if i understand it correctly, then both the OS version and the
computer system (i.e processor) has to be the same.
What is the reason for the processer has to be the same?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
2016-01-04 15:31 GMT+01:00 Martin Reuter :
> Hi Kas
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
In regard to fsaverage, we are wondering whether it is recommended to use
the default fsaverage or if a new fsaverage should be created for the
individual dataset. If there are no recommendations, what are
the advantages and disadvantages?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
MD
onal group analysis in
QDEC?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
MD, PhD student
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
rectories are located).
> 2. yes (fsaverage should be linked there anyway, right?)
> 3. yes
>
> ;-) Martin
>
>
> On 03/09/2016 03:42 PM, Kasper Jessen wrote:
>
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> We have a longitudinal study design with up to 5 time points. However, we
>
xperienced the same. Unfortunately i cannot find the answer, which fixes
the problem. As far as i understand, it may be because i am using a new
version of Matlab. However, is there a way to fix the problem?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
MD, PhD student
___
try it with that version.
>
> Cheers, Clara
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Kasper Jessen"
> An: "Freesurfer support list"
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. März 2016 09:41:51
> Betreff: [Freesurfer] Matlabpool has been removed
>
> Dear FreeSurfer
cally create the ..long.. names internally).
>
> cheers, Martin
>
>
>
> On 03/11/2016 08:51 AM, Kasper Jessen wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for the answer :-)
>
> To presmooth the data onto target, with the following command:
>
> recon-all -long -qcach
turned
> on using the -nuintensitycor3t flag. The -nuintensitycor3t flag only
> changes the NU intensity correction parameters, without using the 3T atlas
> in the earlier Talairach stage.
>
> Best,
> Lee
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Kasper Jessen wrote:
>
> Dear fre
Dear FreeSurfer group,
I am having problems with a subject with very large ventricles. The
recon-all exits with errors.
Is it known issue that FreeSurfer is having difficulties with large
ventricles?
How can i solve this problem?
I have read in another post, that the flag -bigventricles may sol
Dear FreeSurfer group,
Our subject sample has been obtained on a 3 Tesla MR scanner. For this
reason we used the -3T flag to enable the 3T-specific NU intensity
correction parameters and usage of the special 3T atlas for Talairach
alignment.
However, where can i find the documentation for the abo
v5.2.0) and
found that a T2/FLAIR can be used to improve the pial surface.
Question: Is it possible to use a T2 and run either -autorecon3 and -T2pial
on the [LONG] runs to get extra improvement of the final pial surfaces?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
7;t done this yet I don't think, so there
> may be undiscovered bugs.
> Bruce
> On Fri, 13 May 2016, Kasper Jessen wrote:
>
> Dear FreeSurfer,
> Currently, we have only manual edited the BASE (the CROSS was left
> unedited)
> in an longitudinal data. However, some corti
Hi Kasper
>
> you might try downloading dev and see if it works. The upcoming (but never
> quite ready) V6 should have much better handling of enlarged ventricles.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, 10 May 2016, Kasper Jessen wrote:
>
> Dear FreeSurfer group,
>> I am h
I would like to know the following:
a) what is the differences between the 3T Atlas (schwartz atlas) and the
standard atlas?
b) what does the 3T-specific NU intensity correction parameters do
differently than the standard?
Best
Kasper
2016-05-10 8:09 GMT+02:00 Kasper Jessen :
> Dear FreeSur
it that is probably wrong?
Best regards,
Kasper
2016-05-17 14:48 GMT+02:00 Moeller, Sebastian <
sebastian.moell...@rwth-aachen.de>:
> Hi Kasper,
>
>
> > On May 17, 2016, at 10:05 , Kasper Jessen wrote:
> >
> > I would like to know the following:
> >
&g
>
> On 05/17/2016 03:54 AM, Kasper Jessen wrote:
>
> Unfortunately i do not think it works to pass it directly into a
> longitudinal run. I tried the following, which exited with errors:
>
> recon-all -long d256a d256_base -FLAIR path/flair.nii.gz -autorecon3
> -FLAIRpial
&g
dence of T1
>
> Hopefully somone else can answer b) as I don't remember.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Tue, 17 May 2016, Kasper Jessen wrote:
>
> I would like to know the following:
>> a) what is the differences between the 3T Atlas (schwartz atlas) and the
>>
Dear FreeSurfer,
I have a longitudinal study (patients and controls) with two time points (i.e.,
baseline and six-weeks follow-up). I would like to use the LME model as it can
handle unequal timing and different number of time points across subjects due
to missing data.
I would like to test if t
Dear Freesurfer,
I would like to test if the percentage change (two time points) of cortical
thickness is different between two groups.
What i have done:
FIRST: long_stats_slopes --qdec ./qdec/long.qdec.table.dat --stats
lh.aparc.stats --meas thickness --sd $SUBJECTS_DIR --do-spc --generic-ti
Dear FreeSurfer,
I would like to do the long. two stage model
(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalTwoStageModel)
Study design: 2 groups (one control group, one patient group) with gender and
age as covariates. Each subject was MRI scanned at baseline and 6 weeks
follow-up. I
I have found the reason for the error: FSGDF Format Error: file =
/Volumes/External/P1_FU/GroupDiffLhThickness.fsgd, tag=Input
The class should be 1.0 and 0.0, as stated in the fsgd file.
Otherwise, is the process still correct?
BW
Kasper
> Original Message
> Subject: problem
Dear FreeSurfer
I have read through a similar question/answer (again):
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg53238.html
However, i still done seem to understand how to exactly pass the output of
long_stats_slopes into the following command with a C and fsgd file??
mri_g
What is the unit of the spc, which you extract?
Fx. in my data I have a -0.49 = does that mean a -0.49 % decrease?
BW
Kasper
Fra: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] På vegne af Martin Reuter
Sendt: 19. juli 2017 11:37
Til: Freesurfer support l
Dear Freesurfer,
The following is a follow-up, on a previous discussion
(http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg51582.html) but
i am still left with some uncertain and unanswered questions.
My design: Patients and Controls, MRI scanned at baseline and after 6 weeks
(only
Dear FreeSurfer,
We have been discussing the mean curvature provided by FreeSurfer software. As
i understand the mean curvature is measured as 1/r and has a unit of 1/mm.
But
a) What is the curvature an expression of? Is it the degree of folding of the
brain and is it the white matter surface
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Curvature in FreeSurfer
> Local Time: August 16, 2017 4:13 PM
> UTC Time: August 16, 2017 2:13 PM
> From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> To: Kasper Jess
Hi FreeSurfer,
We have extracted the surface area using aparcstats2table.
1.The ROIs extracted are by default the White Surface Area, correct?
2.Why does the WhiteSurfArea (default average) have decimals but not the
surface area of the different ROIs? When taking the SUM of all the RO
Dear FreeSurfer,
When you extract e.g. thickness from the command aparcstats2table - is the data
extracted from subject space?
We need to know whether or not, we need to covariate for total brain volume.
Bw
Kasper
Kasper Jessen,
MD, PhD student
Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia
Hej FreeSurfer,
Question regarding the meancurv extracted from the Desikan atlas using
aparcstats2table.
Is the meancurv the absolute mean curvature? Thus all the values are positive?
Best regards
Kasper
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email.
Sent with [P
you for the quick reply.
BW
Kasper
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On March 8, 2018 4:13 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Kaspar
>
> I don't think so.
>
> cheers
>
> Bruce
of subjects?
Best regards,
Kasper Jessen
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If
45 matches
Mail list logo