Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 2:33 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Brian wrote:
I was evaluating the technologies available, and I thought you would be
interested in my results.
ts or fixes
> I need. FreeSWITCH would be no different.
>
>
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:34 AM
> To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-us
how
> that scales...
>
>
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Collins [mailto:m...@freeswitch.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 18, 2009 2:33 PM
>
> *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference sc
for the streaming idea to see how
that scales...
Brian.
From: Michael Collins [mailto:m...@freeswitch.org]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 2:33 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:14
Brian, there was not one insulting word in anything I have said and as this
is a community mailing list my replies are always voiced to address the
public in general not you specifically, like I already mentioned in my last
post.
If you open a public forum on a FAQ be prepared to hear our policy.
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:34 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
Conferencing is hardly the best place to judge performance.
Quality is a far more important goal to me in conferencing.
Lets compare who can do
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Brian wrote:
> I was evaluating the technologies available, and I thought you would be
> interested in my results. However, almost every other reply I get from you
> to my posts, rather than being helpful, has been hostile and insulting.
>
Thanks for your input.
18, 2009 11:34 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
Conferencing is hardly the best place to judge performance.
Quality is a far more important goal to me in conferencing.
Lets compare who can do 48khz conferences with several
ote:
> > > I did a test with the trunk version for the one conference
> > case, and
> > > it is the same results as for 1.0.4. The audio failed at
> > around 300
> > > listeners. Oddly though, it consumed less %CPU (240% ins
teners. Oddly though, it consumed less %CPU (240% instead
> of 300%),
> > and yet the audio still failed at the same number of
> listeners.
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian.
> >
> >
forum
> > to use for this topic from now on.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:42 PM
December 17, 2009 3:49 PM
> To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
>
>
>
>
> We didn't post it anywhere but we just get overwhelmed with them and
> many of them are unfounded and take up a lot of time to tr
]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:20 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
What exactly are you doing I know it goes better than that.. are you
using 64bit?
/ b
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Brian wrote:
I did a test
for listener DTMF.
To compare FreeSWITCH vs Asterisk, I just swap out the secondary conference
server and everything else stays the same.
Brian.
From: Brian West [mailto:br...@freeswitch.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:20 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subje
gh, it consumed less %CPU (240% instead of 300%), and yet the
>> audio still failed at the same number of listeners.
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009
d yet the
> audio still failed at the same number of listeners.
>
>
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
> *From:* Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:49 PM
>
> *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> *Subject:* R
What exactly are you doing I know it goes better than that.. are you using
64bit?
/ b
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Brian wrote:
> I did a test with the trunk version for the one conference case, and it is
> the same results as for 1.0.4. The audio failed at around 300 listeners.
> Oddly thoug
g the wiki and source code to
see what can be done with that.
Thanks,
Brian.
-Original Message-
From: David Knell [mailto:d...@3c.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 4:07 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
Hi
: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:49 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
We didn't post it anywhere but we just get overwhelmed with them and many of
them are unfounde
t;
> From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:42 PM
> To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
>
>
>
>
> One man's stable release is another ma
c from now on.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
> *From:* Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:42 PM
>
> *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_confere
Thanks,
Brian.
From: Anthony Minessale [mailto:anthony.miness...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:42 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
One man's stable release is another man's 6 month old rele
Yes, while it is true that does make a profound difference but if he has many
listeners and not very many talkers... just tapping into the conference and
streaming that audio out would scale well.
/b
On Dec 17, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> I don't think you have mentioned which
e a profound effect.
Steve
> *From:* Michael Jerris [mailto:m...@jerris.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:18 AM
> *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
>
> I would be curious what the same tests produce wit
ember 17, 2009 10:18 AM
> To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
>
> I would be curious what the same tests produce with svn trunk of FreeSWITCH.
>
> Mike
>
> On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Brian wrote:
>
>
FreeSWITCH
> capacity in this case. Again, maybe there is something on the FreeSWITCH
> side that I’m doing wrong, but I don’t see what it could be.
>
>
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Jerris [mailto:m...@jerris.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:
If you're going to have that many listeners then it would be best to use
something like shoutcast to broadcast the stream out to a local stream on
various different boxes... then tie the callers into a stream... when they have
questions uuid_transfer them into the conf.. then back to the stream
oing wrong, but I don't see what it could be.
Brian.
From: Michael Jerris [mailto:m...@jerris.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:18 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_conference scalability
I would be curious what the same te
I would be curious what the same tests produce with svn trunk of FreeSWITCH.
Mike
On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Brian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m new to FreeSWITCH and I’m testing the scalability of mod_conference to
> see if it will scale better that other solutions. My scenario is to have one
> sp
how are the listeners connecting?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Brian wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m new to FreeSWITCH and I’m testing the scalability of mod_conference to
> see if it will scale better that other solutions. My scenario is to have one
> speaker, and many listeners (mute). Since I h
Hi,
I'm new to FreeSWITCH and I'm testing the scalability of mod_conference to
see if it will scale better that other solutions. My scenario is to have one
speaker, and many listeners (mute). Since I have only one speaker, I was
expecting this to scale well because there is no audio mixing requ
31 matches
Mail list logo
