way it would be 100% open source which would
be super awesome.
I would imagine leaving the DMR standard (9.6kbps) in favour of a lower phy
bit rate would also offer gains as far as power per bit is concerned, but
that would be much more involved I would guess.
Regards,
Daniel Mundall VA7DRM
ause there could be hardware limitations with what is even available as
far a hardware functions on the MCU.
Regards,
Daniel Mundall VA7DRM
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:59 AM Eric Jacksch wrote:
> I don't know enough about CODECS to know the right answer (thus must
> post here), but right now th
Hi Adrian,
Totally agree about the SDR hardware getting cheaper, a good case in point is
the limeSDR mini which has more than enough flexibility for any ham style
project.
https://www.crowdsupply.com/lime-micro/limesdr-mini#products-top
Couple that with a rock64 and you could have a great low
of the large aims of the SM2000.
For my part I have a few limeSDR's that I've been playing with using Pothos
and GNU Radio to try and learn how everything works well enough that I can
actually contribute to something like this.
Have a great day!
Daniel Mundall
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Ross
I'll host freedv.org for free as a contribution to the project if that
interests you. I can install a blank Wordpress too. Just let me know.
Daniel Mundall
Sent from Daniel's iPhone
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Bruce Perens <br...@perens.com> wrote:
>
> The server company
Hi Steve,
I think that this is a great idea, we've been playing with LoRa for a few
years now with great results. And now with some SDR libraries showing up it
stands to be an interesting option for UHF Voice/messaging.
73's
Daniel
Daniel Mundall
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Steve
Hi Glen,
We haven't dropped the CMX994, David has just been feeling out other
options. I just got my dev boards for the CMX994 and 971 today so I'll be
running some test with them over the next few days.
Daniel
Daniel Mundall
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:20 PM, glen english g...@cortexrf.com.au
David,
The Si570 is around $10 dollars at best, seems like there's no cost savings
to be found down this route.
Just my thoughts anyway.
Daniel
Daniel Mundall
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:46 PM, David Rowe da...@rowetel.com wrote:
Hi Glen,
Thanks you for those suggestion, the VHF soft rock
see a BER for each method to see what it's doing.
Daniel Mundall VA7DRM
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:29 PM, glen english g...@cortexrf.com.au wrote:
Hi Daniel
I'll be looking forward to your single antenna split result- just a T
piece on a BNC will do the job (costs 6dB rather than 3dB) I
branches (channels)
the benefits are diminishing...
With a digital system the two branch diversity will be the difference
between a system with less coverage than the analog, and a system that
is far superior.
73
glen
On 17/02/2015 2:36 PM, Daniel Mundall wrote:
Hello Glen,
Thanks
, do you know anything about turnstile antennas configured
as horizontal polarized omni antennas, are they any good? I've been
thinking of building one for testing H-pol. (
http://www.g8seq.com/vhf_antennas.php )
Thanks,
Daniel VA7DRM
Daniel Mundall
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:59 AM, glen english
with an STM32, presuming that they'd help.
Thanks again for your input on all this, you have no idea how much time you
are saving me!
Daniel VA7DRM
Daniel Mundall
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:17 PM, glen english g...@cortexrf.com.au wrote:
Hi Daniel
SAW filter post VNA is good idea. Although
Hello David,
Maybe this question has been asked before, but if I went to a 100ms audio
frame size what quality advantages could I get? I'm wondering if I could
get a 2400bits/s quality in say 1700bits/s.
Thanks,
Daniel Mundall VA7DRM
to keep the timing correct while having
20ms interruptions every 20ms?
Thanks,
Daniel Mundall VA7DRM
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases
changes by measuring the BER at an Eb/No point, as per the
Octave simulations. It's really easy to introduce an error that will
degrade the demod performance.
Cheers,
David
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 14:58 -0700, Daniel Mundall wrote:
Hello Guys,
I've been playing with the FDMDV modem to see if I can
Rick,
Thanks for the info!
Somewhere along the line I must have gotten some wrong numbers, if RS is
really that good, it totally makes sense to use it, at least on the more
important bits.
Thanks for correcting me!
73s
Daniel Mundall
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Rick Muething rmueth
want to see how much potential there is.
73s,
Daniel Mundall
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:15 PM, David Rowe da...@rowetel.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Re FEC currently I am currently trying a Golay (23,11) code which is
about half rate, and can correct 3 errors out of 12 data bits. Lots of
other
get them to 96 K
at the cost that some sound cards won't work. Pretty much all of them do 48
K. The rest of it is C source code - it won't be trivial to change it but
not impossible either.
Daniel Mundall va7...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering how much difficult it would be to change
Hi,
I was wondering how much difficult it would be to change the sample rate to
something more than the symbol rate? More than 160 samples per symbol.
I'd like to experiment with some more wideband arrangements of OFDM.
Thanks for any thoughts,
Daniel Mundall
We've designed a digital 10w 2m radio that we're just testing at the moment.
Any input would be great.
Have a look at hamcell.com
73's
Daniel VA7DRM
Sent from my iPad
On 2012-05-20, at 1:00 PM, Kristoff Bonne krist...@skypro.be wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Well, I try not to look to much at that
Codec2
Digital gives you more!
On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:33 PM, Matt Ettus m...@ettus.com wrote:
Speak Freely
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Bruce Perens br...@perens.com wrote:
I was thinking of Digital that's better than analog.
to have a lot of options!
If you have any ideas you'd like to add to the project, we'd love to hear
about them. You probably know a lot more about this stuff then I do...
Hope your current project goes well.
Best Regards,
Daniel Mundall VA7DRM KE7VLV
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Bruce Perens
22 matches
Mail list logo