[Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Dirk Meyer
Rob Shortt wrote: > Also regarding the new mplayer there is a patch in Freevo CVS, > runtime/src/mplayer_cdda_seeking.diff, that no longer applies. Can > someone test cd playing with freevo using the new mplayer and test if > it will continue to the next song after the first is over? I think > th

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Rob Shortt
Also regarding the new mplayer there is a patch in Freevo CVS, runtime/src/mplayer_cdda_seeking.diff, that no longer applies. Can someone test cd playing with freevo using the new mplayer and test if it will continue to the next song after the first is over? I think that's what that patch was

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Aubin Paul
I would certainly hope so :) DirectFB advertises itself as a solution for embedded systems, so that would be important. Shared objects are convenient, but they invoke performance penalties compared to static libraries. On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:44:32AM -0300, Rob Shortt wrote: > Aubin Paul wrote:

[Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Dirk Meyer
Aubin Paul wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:55:42AM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: >> Or we could support both types of output. I haven't compiled the >> latest mplayer cvs, but maybe that's the better solution. > > I'm not sure how easy it would be; because well, it looks like this: > > A: 1001

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Rob Shortt
Aubin Paul wrote: Well, I still have some things to update in the runtime. Most of it is not too much of a problem but adding directfb support for SDL is a pain and need to come up with a new way of inclidung the drivers. Patch SDL with the directfb patch; build Directfb as static (--enable-

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Aubin Paul
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:06:07AM -0300, Rob Shortt wrote: > It would save me from having to patch mplayer for this every time. :) I figured for this one release we do it, and then break it after :) > MythTV uses a modified nuppelvideo format that mplayer can't play. > Someone on the list asked

[Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Aubin Paul
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:55:42AM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Or we could support both types of output. I haven't compiled the > latest mplayer cvs, but maybe that's the better solution. I'm not sure how easy it would be; because well, it looks like this: A: 1001.2 or A: 16:41.1 Th

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Rob Shortt
Rob Shortt wrote: * A recent snapshot with the patch to revert the audio behaviour (the one I sent earlier this week) Or we could support both types of output. I haven't compiled the latest mplayer cvs, but maybe that's the better solution. It would save me from having to patch mplayer for thi

Re: [Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Rob Shortt
Dirk Meyer wrote: * A recent snapshot with the patch to revert the audio behaviour (the one I sent earlier this week) Or we could support both types of output. I haven't compiled the latest mplayer cvs, but maybe that's the better solution. It would save me from having to patch mplayer for this

[Freevo-devel] Re: Next runtime...

2003-06-06 Thread Dirk Meyer
Aubin Paul wrote: > Rob, > > I'm thinking the next runtime should probably include this stuff for > mplayer > > * A recent snapshot with the patch to revert the audio behaviour (the > one I sent earlier this week) Or we could support both types of output. I haven't compiled the latest mplayer cv