One man's spam is another man's "valid content". For example, I learned this
JavaScript trick from a ransomware attack I received awhile back:
> this["eval"]("console.log(\'hello\')")
hello
Anyway, because you _personally_ recommend the book, I'll finally take a look.
On 05/20/2016 10:52
Yikes! I hope I didn't just add to your spam! Also, I didn't realize
how much more it sells for now! My introduction to Law was through a
seminar I attended in Washington DC where I was a consultant. His book was
the textbook used in an M class I took at George Mason University for my
MS in
On 05/20/2016 10:11 AM, Robert Wall wrote:
> Have you read Averill Law's /Simulation Modeling and Analysis/? Makes a good
> reference too. Cheers.
Not yet. I'm glad to hear you say that. I've been suspicious of Law's work
because I get continual _spam_ from him (or his staff, or publishers
This is just kicking a dead scorpion ... Thanks Glen for the
follow-up. The whole curfuffle brings critical thinking to the forefront,
and that ain't bad. To me, skepticism is a science-oriented version of
mindfulness--being mindful of misgrounded or ungrounded, inculcated
beliefs. Yes, it
Dead horses notwithstanding, I found this comment chuckle-worthy:
---
Mary Mangan • 2016-05-19 02:51 AM
Heh. Yeah--imagine making evidence-free (aka "impressionistic") claims in front
of a room full of people who value evidence. Who could have predicted that?
---
That was a
