@Ralf, you (accidentally?) deleted tag 1.3.3 yesterday.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
>> In GUESSPI.htex the output is simply to long. LaTeX seems not to be able
>> to work properly on it. Since showing the actual input is not too
>> relevant for the demonstration of guessPRec, i've simply suppressed the
>> output of the first command.
>>
>> The problem in LLLRED.htex is that my
On 03/18/2018 10:11 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Raymond Rogers wrote:
I just downloaded the binary from sourceforge
fricas-1.3.3.amd64.tar.bz2
It declares that it's version 1.3.2
The time stamps on the fricas/efricas are Mar 12 this year.
Should I get the source and build or do you want more
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> > Of course logically 'exactQuotient' makes sense, but I am a bit
> > reluctant given that 'quo' has equivalent effect and for clarity
> > one can do
> >
> >exactQuotient(x, y) ==> x quo y
>
> Well, maybe currently not relevant, but apart from avoiding needless
>
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> 2) Waldek added two more .htex files. Both of them with problems for my
> book.pdf generation. Waldek, I would like to commit the following patch.
>
> https://github.com/hemmecke/fricas/commit/c7a04b4248338271b6c1cfd008def9f8158bc4a2.patch
>
> In GUESSPI.htex the output
> Of course logically 'exactQuotient' makes sense, but I am a bit
> reluctant given that 'quo' has equivalent effect and for clarity
> one can do
>
>exactQuotient(x, y) ==> x quo y
Well, maybe currently not relevant, but apart from avoiding needless
wrapping in Union or computing the
On 03/17/2018 07:21 AM, oldk1331 wrote:
> @Ralf, can you push the 1.3.3 tag
Done.
> to github and update the documentation site?
Also done. But there are two issues.
1) It seems that it's as imperfect as for 1.3.2. I saw some sphinx
problems that I have to fix. But the result is certainly as
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> FriCAS Integer implements exquo via
>
> INTEXQUO(x, y)$Lisp
>
> https://github.com/fricas/fricas/blob/master/src/algebra/integer.spad#L143
>
> I have several places where I know from context that the division will
> not fail (I divide out a gcd). Wouldn't it make sense
Raymond Rogers wrote:
>
> I just downloaded the binary from sourceforge
> fricas-1.3.3.amd64.tar.bz2
> It declares that it's version 1.3.2
> The time stamps on the fricas/efricas are Mar 12 this year.
> Should I get the source and build or do you want more tests on this?
For me binary shows
