oldk1331 wrote:
>
> Another angle to see this problem:
>
> In theory, every Euclidean domain is a unique factorization
> domain, but in FriCAS, it's not.
>
> In an email one year ago, there's discussion about it:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fricas-devel/mMmm9zmC7io
>
> > There
Another angle to see this problem:
In theory, every Euclidean domain is a unique factorization
domain, but in FriCAS, it's not.
In an email one year ago, there's discussion about it:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fricas-devel/mMmm9zmC7io
> There are principal ideal domains where all
> ATM I am undecided. I am not sure if changing 'up' to 'UP' is
> really an improvement. OTOH there are several uses of 'pretend'...
I think types should all be capitalized, and changing UP to a macro
is better.
As for the usage of pretend, the whole PartialFractionPackage still looks
>
> Any update on this patch?
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:58 PM, oldk1331 wrote:
> > A little more misc fixes and improvements for pfr.spad:
> >
> > https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/57f913c588bbdb970f50305ccb72e912586fcb2b.patch
> >
> > It's not included in the
Any update on this patch?
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:58 PM, oldk1331 wrote:
> A little more misc fixes and improvements for pfr.spad:
>
> https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/57f913c588bbdb970f50305ccb72e912586fcb2b.patch
>
> It's not included in the patch, but maybe it's
A little more misc fixes and improvements for pfr.spad:
https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/57f913c588bbdb970f50305ccb72e912586fcb2b.patch
It's not included in the patch, but maybe it's better to replace
"nil()" with "[]"?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updated patch:
https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/b0fb558ecee4b387d45b7c210841003ebc832bb6.patch
> It seems that we can add new funtion directly to PartialFraction,
> without creating a new package.
Fixed.
> I am doing such things in lazy way: if looking at code there
> may be doubt
oldk1331 wrote:
>
> https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/a7e1be2d9bbf176d8b97aa0e4d8d382417ada1b6.patch
It seems that we can add new funtion directly to PartialFraction,
without creating a new package.
>
>
> Futhermore, I want to remove the "global type declaration"
> of a,b,r,n in
https://github.com/oldk1332/fricas/commit/a7e1be2d9bbf176d8b97aa0e4d8d382417ada1b6.patch
Futhermore, I want to remove the "global type declaration"
of a,b,r,n in PartialFraction, opinions?
After this patch, some examples:
(1) -> partialFraction(1/18)
14
(1) ─ - ──