On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Isn't "construct" that what Aldor calls "bracket"?
> Shouldn't somewhere be written that by syntactic sugar
>
> construct [a,b,c]
>
> can simply be written as
>
> [a, b, c]
>
> ? I guess, this was the reason for
Isn't "construct" that what Aldor calls "bracket"?
Shouldn't somewhere be written that by syntactic sugar
construct [a,b,c]
can simply be written as
[a, b, c]
? I guess, this was the reason for documenting it the way it was before
this patch. Am I wrong?
Ralf
On 03/09/2018 02:15 PM,