http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/gates-wikileaks.pdf
Fax from John McCain to Senate Chairman Carl Levin.
The initial assessment in no way discounts the risk to national security;
however,
the review to date has not revealed
any sensitive intelligence sources and methods compromised by this
-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of PsychoBilly
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 4:00 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved
up
http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/gates-wikileaks.pdf
Fax from John McCain
: Cal Leeming c...@foxwhisper.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up
To: Harry Behrens ha...@behrens.com
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Date: Saturday, October 23, 2010, 9:57 PM
So, it appears Wikileaks is now back online.. And they have put a new
So, it appears Wikileaks is now back online.. And they have put a new
'warlogs' database online.. They do appear to have filtered out various
things (there's ---'s in place of where words should be)... I don't know
if this is like a cut down version of what they have, but it's is
tediously
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:43 PM, BMF badmotherfs...@gmail.com wrote:
...
So some are playing it up but [some] is playing
it down. Who ya gonna believe?
C. None of the above.
if they are mute or non-publishing it is by decision or apathy... you
can always distribute - just how much do you
1+ propaganda victim ( man! you're a hacker, don't you remember? )
[[ Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] ]] @ [[ 21/10/2010 23:59
]]--
I apologise for this, I had heard this in, what I had believed to be, a
credible news report.
1+
Off topic but...
On 22 October 2010 07:06, Jonathan Medina jonmed...@gmail.com wrote:
the information it provides to insurgents endangers our sources and the
families of
sources that have provided us with valuable information.
These people are giving you information but would be well aware
://cryptome.org/0002/wikileaks-unlike.htm
Thanks
--- On Thu, 10/21/10, Harry Behrens ha...@behrens.com wrote:
From: Harry Behrens
ha...@behrens.com
Subject: [Full-disclosure] wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Date: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 4:32 PM
Then prove it. I don't care if you're married to the queen of England: your
statement that WL has hurt the troops carries no ground without evidence.
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/10/17/wikileaks/index.html
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Medina
Well I think 'Twatter' risks alienating the sex professional community
who you will need to buy in, something a little more upmarket perhaps.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:06:15 PDT, Jonathan Medina said:
I am in the military, currently in Iraq, and these Wikileaks posts
have hurt us more than people realize. It does two things, first, it
demonstrates our tactics and procedures which allow insurgents to
conduct more effective attacks
The more knowledge of your enemy tactics you have the better no?
And though I would still prefer actual proof of the info, the Pentagon
top brass debunking is something they would do if it were true as well?
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
As a result, even 100% perfect knowledge of our
Sorry to all of those who think this is gossiping, but:
Wikileaks has been down for ca. 2 weeks now during which time the US has
at least cut off their financial channels.
This during a period where WL has announced another major leak release
this time re. Iraq.
What is also extremely
This will be my first and last post on this topic (again).
I've just finished watching some videos about what wikileaks have been
doing.
It appears that they released a bunch of documents that revealed information
such as GPS co-ords + details of those who co-op'd with soldiers. He also
posted
Hi Cal,
I can appreciate his previous efforts, but what he has done here is put many
lifes at risk, both civilians and soldiers.
Agreed.
Just to play devils advocate:
Would Barrack Obama also be culpable? His campaign platform included a
withdrawl from Iraq (Afghanistan was a different story).
-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Cal Leeming
[Simplicity Media Ltd]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:51 AM
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up
This will be my first and last post on this topic (again
Am 21.10.2010 18:54, schrieb T Biehn:
An entity that has the resources that would provoke such a hollywood
esque tweet wouldn't have the ability to gag the twitter account
before this release?
would it, would it want to, has it missed it..who knows?
Wouldn't that mean the tweet is a load
I believe that most of the times it is not what you defend but how you
defend it.
I believe in Government transparency but the way WL is going about it
it's not right, in my honest opinion.
So this is good news in my opinion...
-r
___
Full-Disclosure -
I have seen nothing released that reveals sensitive information such as GPS
co-ords + details of those who co-op'd with soldiers.
This is a rumor. If you have proof that this is not a rumor, please post it.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
According to the secretary of defense, it's definitely a rumor:
A letter from Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates to
Comittee of Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin dated August 16 but
recently made available to the public says, The initial assessment in
no way discounts the risk to national
I apologise for this, I had heard this in, what I had believed to be, a
credible news report.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Camden Buzard camde...@aptalaska.netwrote:
According to the secretary of defense, it's definitely a rumor:
A letter from Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates to
-disclosure] wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved
up
I believe that most of the times it is not what you defend but how you
defend it.
I believe in Government transparency but the way WL is going about it it's
not right, in my honest opinion.
So this is good news in my opinion...
-r
I am in the military, currently in Iraq, and these Wikileaks posts
have hurt us more than people realize. It does two things, first, it
demonstrates our tactics and procedures which allow insurgents to
conduct more effective attacks against us, and second, the information
it provides to insurgents
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Charles Timko
charles.ti...@hotmail.com wrote:
Agreed. I am all for the transparency, but WL is possibly putting our troops
at risk by releasing military strategy. I wouldn't expect JA to think that
From:
Sorry but I find the whole subject incredibly boring, as do quite a
few other people (again, each to their own).
Because, when it comes down to it, breaches happen all the time, and
cryptome/wikileaks is no different. It's really is *just another
website*, despite what it is used for and
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk wrote:
Sorry but I find the whole subject incredibly boring, as do quite a
few other people (again, each to their own).
To play devils advocate: if two folks find the topic boring, would it
Yeah, I think I've managed to inadvertently done the very thing I was
complaining about to begin with. Last post on this from me!
On 08/10/2010 12:39, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk wrote:
Harry Behrens wrote:
If you don't understand why something like Wikileaks being down with no
obvious reason or explanation is an issue - then I guess continue
sleeping...
And it is indeed a security issue - in fact of international proportions..
Oh please. The world does not stop for
I've been reading the list of emails with some mild interest and
Mr Oquendo couldn't have hit a better answer.
If I had to pick one, I'd vote for Why would Wikipedia be down?
Anyway, let me say one thing. What happened to all the fuss about dll
hijack exploits?
Did they live up to their
On 10/8/2010 9:41 AM, J. Oquendo wrote:
Harry Behrens wrote:
And it is indeed a security issue - in fact of international proportions..
...
Security issue of international proportions my ass.
If I may try to interpret what's going on here (and apologies to both
parties if I get it wrong), I
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
J. is not so sanguine about the mission of Wikileaks and/or how well it
fulfills it and/or how important it is for protecting our lives and
liberties. As we see from this comment:
How well it protects who's liberties. Show me some factual information
on where it
Christian Sciberras wrote:
Want a piece of my mind? Read Schneier article on the 'SCADA' virus...
Cheers, Chris.
Wait. You wrote that article? I always figured Schneier had ghostwriters.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
False assertion, it's an attention whoring story for anyone in #sec..or in RPG
1- Fetch sparce elements
wget:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/10/cryptome-hacked/
https://eta.securesslhost.net/~pgpboar/viewtopic.php?f=2t=129
I still maintain this is completely out of topic for full-disclosure.
Maybe there should be a new list for this kind of gossip whoring?
[gossip-disclosure] maybe... *shrugs*
On 07/10/2010 13:53, PsychoBilly wrote:
False assertion, it's an attention whoring story for anyone in #sec..or in RPG
-To: cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
I still maintain this is completely out of topic for full-disclosure.
Maybe there should be a new list for this kind of gossip whoring?
[gossip-disclosure] maybe... *shrugs*
On 07/10/2010 13:53, PsychoBilly wrote
: full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:05:18
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Reply-To: cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
I still maintain this is completely out of topic for full-disclosure.
Maybe there should
...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
I still maintain this is completely out of topic for full-disclosure.
Maybe there should be a new list for this kind of gossip whoring?
[gossip-disclosure] maybe... *shrugs*
On 07/10/2010 13:53, PsychoBilly wrote:
False assertion, it's
: Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk
Sender: full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:05:18
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Reply-To: cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
I
[Simplicity Media Ltd]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:54 AM
To: Paul Schmehl; full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
*sighs*
On 07/10/2010 19:53, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Then you will be whining for a long time.
I was the second person to subscribe to this list
-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WikiLeaks
*sighs*
On 07/10/2010 19:53, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Then you will be whining for a long time.
I was the second person to subscribe to this list, and I can guarantee
you that no amount of whining will change it. The bozos who
Am 07.10.2010 22:37, schrieb Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]:
Yeah, you both have valid points. In this case though, I really just
don't see why everyone is so hyped up about the wikileaks / cryptome
stuff. :S
If you don't understand why something like Wikileaks being down with no
Am 07.10.2010 22:37, schrieb Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]:
Yeah, you both have valid points. In this case though, I really just
don't see why everyone is so hyped up about the wikileaks / cryptome
stuff. :S
If you don't understand why something like Wikileaks being down with no
It's the newest tweet still.
Juha-Matti
Jeffrey Walton [noloa...@gmail.com] kirjoitti:
The latest is kind of funny (Latest smear attempt: Chinese spy agency
gave WikiLeaks $20M).
Just call it a 'PAC Contribution' and everything will be fine.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Juha-Matti
I'm not sure why everyone is so fussed about this tbh..
And surely, full-disclosure is no place for such a discussion either..
/rant
On 06/10/2010 19:06, Juha-Matti Laurio wrote:
It's the newest tweet still.
Juha-Matti
Jeffrey Walton [noloa...@gmail.com] kirjoitti:
The latest is kind of
Two days ago I managed to find somebody (Anny) on their web chat.
She didn't say much, only that it's supposed to be up in a week or so
and that the issues are technical vs. political.
I still believe it smells of fish.
And to kinda paraphrase: Just because J Assange is a raving paranoid
And nothing related is not tweeted at
http://twitter.com/wikileaks
Juha-Matti
Harry Behrens [ha...@behrens.com] kirjoitti:
for 5 days and nothing about this to be found on google.
Does anybody have an idea what is happening here - it does smell
slightly fishy...
-h
The latest is kind of funny (Latest smear attempt: Chinese spy agency
gave WikiLeaks $20M).
Just call it a 'PAC Contribution' and everything will be fine.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Juha-Matti Laurio
juha-matti.lau...@netti.fi wrote:
And nothing related is not tweeted at
http://www.pgpboard.com/viewtopic.php?f=2t=125
dadamdadam dadam fire proof @ least!!!
probably just assange throwing a tantrum
2010/10/3 Harry Behrens ha...@behrens.com mailto:ha...@behrens.com
for 5 days and nothing about this to be found on google.
Does anybody have an idea
probably just assange throwing a tantrum
2010/10/3 Harry Behrens ha...@behrens.com
for 5 days and nothing about this to be found on google.
Does anybody have an idea what is happening here - it does smell
slightly fishy...
-h
___
for 5 days and nothing about this to be found on google.
Does anybody have an idea what is happening here - it does smell
slightly fishy...
-h
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
50 matches
Mail list logo
