soap and water

1998-05-31 Thread A. Pierce
Subject: [PNEWS] Understanding globalization People's Tribune (Online Edition) Vol. 25 No. 6/ June, 1998 P.O. Box 3524, Chicago, IL 60654 http://www.mcs.com/~league "EDITORIAL: UNDERSTANDING GLOBALIZATION" >At this point, globalization means that capital is free to roam >the world in search of c

Re: soap and water/globalisation's effect on living standards

1998-05-31 Thread Durant
> Does it necessarily follow that "lowering of living standards for all > workers and absolute poverty for most" follows from capital's "roaming of > the world in search of cheap labour". > I think not. > Surely it must improve the living standards of some individuals in less well > off countri

Re: One Lump or Two? (fwd)

1998-05-31 Thread Tom Walker
Eva Durant wrote, >however, I am not familiar with your response >to the argument, that shorter working hours >and more people employed causes the fall of >profits, due to larger contributions and >labour costs. If it wasn't so, why business >cannot be cajoled with the already existing >incenti

Re: One Lump or Two? (fwd)

1998-05-31 Thread Tom Walker
Eva Durant asked me to forward this message to the list. however, I am not familiar with your response to the argument, that shorter working hours and more people employed causes the fall of profits, due to larger contributions and labour costs. If it wasn't so, why business cannot be cajoled wi

Re: soap and water

1998-05-31 Thread Steve Kurtz
Greetings, Please enter the following into your computations; these are not subject to dispute except for "rounding errors". Approximately 1/4 million humans are added to the population DAILY. That is the net amount that births exceed deaths. The "pie" that is divided, whether sustainable or not

Re: soap and water

1998-05-31 Thread Peter Marks
Tony Pierce writes: > Does it necessarily follow that "lowering of living standards for all > workers and absolute poverty for most" follows from capital's "roaming of > the world in search of cheap labour". 'Necessarily' is such a coercive word - only in Mathematics does anything of significan

One Lump or Two?

1998-05-31 Thread Tom Walker
Proposals to reduce unemployment by sharing the available work are routinely scoffed at as being based on a so-called 'lump of labour fallacy'. The Economist, for example, becomes notably agitated whenever the topic of reducing work time comes up. On two occasions (Nov. 25, 1995 and Oct. 25, 1997)