On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
on the FVWM-specific aspects of a proposed config to make sure it's done
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
on the FVWM-specific aspects of a
Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
on the FVWM-specific aspects of a proposed config to
I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
as it is, and instead of changing the default config, better invest
some time into an idea of offering some example configurations for
new FVWM
Michael Großer michael.gros...@gmx.de writes:
Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
as it is,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:36:38AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
as it is, and instead of changing the default config, better invest
some time into an
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:07:07PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although
