Yes Thomas,
Thomas Funk worked at this. I did some minor stuff, when I had time.
But I'm off to the sea for a week... will send you Thomas' effort tough.
Cheers,
Christine
On 01/21/2012 10:02 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
on the FVWM-specific aspects of a proposed config to make sure it's done
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
on the FVWM-specific aspects of a
Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
on the FVWM-specific aspects of a proposed config to
I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
as it is, and instead of changing the default config, better invest
some time into an idea of offering some example configurations for
new FVWM
Michael Großer michael.gros...@gmx.de writes:
Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
as it is,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:36:38AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote:
I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important.
I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal
as it is, and instead of changing the default config, better invest
some time into an
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:07:07PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
Thomas Adam tho...@fvwm.org writes:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although
First of all, sorry if I got some mailing list things wrong. Being aware
of fvwm
IRC FAQ I would still mention I'm pretty much noob and Nth generation Linux
and fvwm user, so what I say might seem strange.
To my mind what a default config should be like depends mostly on what the
developers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:24:53AM +0400, Roman wrote:
To my mind what a default config should be like depends mostly on what the
developers would like to achieve. Would you like the userbase to be
small and
somewhat elitist, or would you like to make fvwm more popular and tolerate
(clueless)
On 04/27/2011 02:46 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:- pixmap window decorations
looking rather minimalist but fresh
This is tenuous, because there's absolutely *no* requirement that FVWM is
compiled against XPM support, or PNG, or SVG support. So, stick to vector
buttons, please. I do not want to make
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:51:07AM +0400, Roman wrote:
On 04/27/2011 02:46 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:- pixmap window
decorations looking rather minimalist but fresh
This is tenuous, because there's absolutely *no* requirement that FVWM is
compiled against XPM support, or PNG, or SVG support. So,
Hi all,
This intended to be something fairly long-running, and I personally don't
wish to make the UI decisions myself, although I will keep a very close eye
on the FVWM-specific aspects of a proposed config to make sure it's done
right.
What do I mean when I say right? Well, for far too long
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:53:58AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
No don't do it! Pretty soon you'll be caught up in the whole
newer is better philosophy that KDE and GNOME are trapped in
and no one on the planet will have any idea how to use fvwm
because it keeps moving everything around and
14 matches
Mail list logo
